Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- And nondiscriminatory (FRAND) (1)
- Bargaining power (1)
- Bundling (1)
- Clarke-Groves-Ledyard (1)
- Contract (1)
-
- Contracts (1)
- Corporate Law (1)
- Employees (1)
- Employers (1)
- Fair (1)
- Incentive incompatibility (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Labor (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Leisure (1)
- Mandatory terms (1)
- Mechanism design (1)
- NLRA (1)
- National labor relations act (1)
- Patent royalties (1)
- Price discrimination (1)
- Reasonable (1)
- Samuelson condition (1)
- Social hierarchy (1)
- Standard setting organizations (1)
- Status (1)
- Unions (1)
- Vickery auctions (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Organizational Behavior and Theory
Public Good Economics And Standard Essential Patents, Christopher S. Yoo
Public Good Economics And Standard Essential Patents, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Standard essential patents have emerged as a major focus in both the public policy and academic arenas. The primary concern is that once a patented technology has been incorporated into a standard, the standard can effectively insulate it from competition from substitute technologies. To guard against the appropriation of quasi-rents that are the product of the standard setting process rather than the innovation itself, standard setting organizations (SSOs) require patentholders to disclose their relevant intellectual property before the standard has been adopted and to commit to license those rights on terms that are fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND).
To date …
The Myth Of Equality In The Employment Relation, Aditi Bagchi
The Myth Of Equality In The Employment Relation, Aditi Bagchi
All Faculty Scholarship
Although it is widely understood that employers and employees are not equally situated, we fail adequately to account for this inequality in the law governing their relationship. We can best understand this inequality in terms of status, which encompasses one’s level of income, leisure and discretion. For a variety of misguided reasons, contract law has been historically highly resistant to the introduction of status-based principles. Courts have preferred to characterize the unfavorable circumstances that many employees face as the product of unequal bargaining power. But bargaining power disparity does not capture the moral problem raised by inequality in the employment …
The "Nexus Of Contracts" Corporation: A Critical Appraisal, William W. Bratton
The "Nexus Of Contracts" Corporation: A Critical Appraisal, William W. Bratton
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.