Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Board codetermination (1)
- Board operation with worker representatives (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
- Duties (1)
-
- EESG disclosure requirements (1)
- Election system & administration (1)
- Employer-provided health insurance (1)
- European codetermination (1)
- Health reform (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Labor law reform (1)
- Medicare for All (1)
- Public option (1)
- Shareholder primacy (1)
- Stakeholder governance (1)
- Workforce committee (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Labor Relations
Lifting Labor’S Voice: A Principled Path Toward Greater Worker Voice And Power Within American Corporate Governance, Leo E. Strine Jr., Aneil Kovvali, Oluwatomi O. Williams
Lifting Labor’S Voice: A Principled Path Toward Greater Worker Voice And Power Within American Corporate Governance, Leo E. Strine Jr., Aneil Kovvali, Oluwatomi O. Williams
All Faculty Scholarship
In view of the decline in gain sharing by corporations with American workers over the last forty years, advocates for American workers have expressed growing interest in allowing workers to elect representatives to corporate boards. Board level representation rights have gained appeal because they are a highly visible part of codetermination regimes that operate in several successful European economies, including Germany’s, in which workers have fared better.
But board-level representation is just one part of the comprehensive codetermination regulatory strategy as it is practiced abroad. Without a coherent supporting framework that includes representation from the ground up, as is provided …
A Public Option For Employer Health Plans, Allison K. Hoffman, Howell E. Jackson, Amy Monahan
A Public Option For Employer Health Plans, Allison K. Hoffman, Howell E. Jackson, Amy Monahan
All Faculty Scholarship
Following the 2020 presidential election, health care reform discussions have centered on two competing proposals: Medicare for All and an individual public option (“Medicare for all who want it”). Interestingly, these two proposals take starkly different approaches to employer-provided health coverage, long the bedrock of the U.S. health care system and the stumbling block to many prior reform efforts. Medicare for All abolishes employer-provided coverage, while an individual public option leaves it untouched.
This Article proposes a novel solution that finds a middle ground between these two extremes: an employer public option. In contrast to the more familiar public option …