Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- General Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Social Choice Theory (2)
- Social Science Explanation (2)
- : Employee participation (1)
-
- Analytical Marxis (1)
- Antireductionism (1)
- Arrow Theorem (1)
- Bureaucratic Management (1)
- Business Associations (1)
- Business Organization (1)
- Class analysis (1)
- Collective entities (1)
- Collective irrationality (1)
- Condorcet cycling (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Democractic decisionmaking (1)
- Elimination (1)
- Employee involvement (1)
- Enterprise Hierarchy (1)
- Evolutionary explanation (1)
- Functional explanation (1)
- G.A. Cohen (1)
- Impossibility Theorem (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Voice Without Say: Why Capital-Managed Firms Aren’T (Genuinely) Participatory, Justin Schwartz
Voice Without Say: Why Capital-Managed Firms Aren’T (Genuinely) Participatory, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
Why are most capitalist enterprises of any size organized as authoritarian bureaucracies rather than incorporating genuine employee participation that would give the workers real authority? Even firms with employee participation programs leave virtually all decision-making power in the hands of management. The standard answer is that hierarchy is more economically efficient than any sort of genuine participation, so that participatory firms would be less productive and lose out to more traditional competitors. This answer is indefensible. After surveying the history, legal status, and varieties of employee participation, I examine and reject as question-begging the argument that the rarity of genuine …
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A number of (present or former) analytical Marxists, such as Jon Elster, have argued that functional explanation has almost no place in the social sciences. (Although the discussion is framed in terms of a debate among analytical Marxists, the point is quite general, and Marxism is used for illustrative purposes.) Functional explanation accounts for what is to be explained by reference to its function; thus, sighted organism have eyes because eyes enable them to see. Elster and other critics of functional explanation argue that this pattern of explanation is inconsistent with "methodological individualism," the idea, as they understand it, that …