Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Class Analysis (1)
- Comparative Literature (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Domination (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Empirical Tests of Moral Theory (1)
- General Law (1)
- History (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Ishmael Bernal (1)
- Jessica Hagedorn (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Objectivity (1)
- Manila (1)
- Manila By Night (1)
- Martial Law (1)
- Marxism (1)
- Milton Fisk (1)
- Moral Objectivity (1)
- Moral Progress (1)
- OIppressiuon (1)
- Opiginal Position (1)
- Politics (1)
- Power (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Queer (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Asian American Studies
Jim Crow In The Soviet Union, Rebecca Gould
Queer Love And Urban Intimacies In Martial Law Manila, Robert Diaz
Queer Love And Urban Intimacies In Martial Law Manila, Robert Diaz
Robert Diaz
This article examines certain representations of Metropolitan Manila and the city’s queer intimacies during Martial Law. In particular, it analyzes Ishmael Bernal’s film Manila By Night (1980) and Jessica Hagedorn’s novel Dogeaters (1990). Released during a time when the Marcoses secured rule through an over-production of their “love team,” and by IMF supported justifications for molding a “beautiful and efficient” Manila, Manila By Night challenges disciplinary plans for the city and its populace through the presence of queer characters that unabashedly love the dirty, dysfunctional and impoverished city. In a similar vein, Dogeaters incorporates characters that practice queer love as …
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
THIS PAPER IS THE CO-WINNER OF THE FRED BERGER PRIZE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW FOR THE 1999 AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BEST PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
The conflict between liberal legal theory and critical legal studies (CLS) is often framed as a matter of whether there is a theory of justice that the law should embody which all rational people could or must accept. In a divided society, the CLS critique of this view is overwhelming: there is no such justice that can command universal assent. But the liberal critique of CLS, that it degenerates into …