Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Formal Systems in Polycontextural Constellations (3)
- Contextural Programming Paradigm (2)
- Logical Argument Mapping, Argument Visualization, and Argumentation Theory (2)
- Argumentation theory (1)
- Ars; lambda calculus; polycontexturality; programming; complexity (1)
-
- Diagrammatic Reasoning, Abduction, Semiotics, and Charles Peirce (1)
- Ethics and Conflicts (1)
- Fibonacci; GHC; HASKELL; SATIN; ConTeXtures; polycontexturality; interactionality; reflectionality; proemiality; polycontextural; Thomas Mahler; Rudolf Kaehr (1)
- Gödel; Hehner; Gunther; reflectional; interactional; polylogics (1)
- Paralegommena (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy of Science
Fibonacci In Contextures, An Application, Rudolf Kaehr
Fibonacci In Contextures, An Application, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Contextures. Programming Dynamic Complexity, Rudolf Kaehr
Contextures. Programming Dynamic Complexity, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Gödel Games: "Cloning Gödel's Proofs", Rudolf Kaehr
Gödel Games: "Cloning Gödel's Proofs", Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
Gödel's Proofs in the context of beautifying (Hehner) and re-beautifying in polycontextural logic. Deconstruction of the relevance.
Lambda Calculi In Polycontextural Situations, Rudolf Kaehr
Lambda Calculi In Polycontextural Situations, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Polylogics. Towards A Formalization Of Polycontextural Logics, Rudolf Kaehr
Polylogics. Towards A Formalization Of Polycontextural Logics, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Limits Of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches To Argumentation, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Limits Of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches To Argumentation, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Some proponents of epistemological approaches to argumentation (Biro, Siegel, Lumer, Goldman) assume that it should be possible to develop non-relative criteria of argument evaluation. By contrast, this paper argues that any evaluation of an argument depends (a) on the cognitive situation of the evaluator, (b) on background knowledge that is available for this evaluator in a certain situation, and (c)—in some cases—on the belief-value-system this person shares.
Logical Argument Mapping: A Method For Overcoming Cognitive Problems Of Conflict Management, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Logical Argument Mapping: A Method For Overcoming Cognitive Problems Of Conflict Management, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
A crucial problem of conflict management is that whatever happens in negotiations will be interpreted and framed by stakeholders based on their different belief-value systems and world views. This problem will be discussed in the first part of this article as the main cognitive problem of conflict management. The second part develops a general semiotic solution of this problem, based on Charles Peirce's concept of "diagrammatic reasoning." The basic idea is that by representing one 's thought in diagrams, the conditions that determine interpretations can become visible, we can "experiment" with them, and we can change them eventually. The third …
What You Should Know To Survive In Knowledge Societies. On A Semiotic Understanding Of 'Knowledge', Michael H.G. Hoffmann
What You Should Know To Survive In Knowledge Societies. On A Semiotic Understanding Of 'Knowledge', Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Different situations - like school and workplace - demand different forms of knowledge. Even more important, in particular for lifelong learning, are forms of knowledge we need for managing movements between those situations. To develop a better understanding of how to 'navigate' knowledge boundaries, this paper analyzes, firstly, interviews with scientists interpreting familiar and unfamiliar graphs. Our goal is to identify those forms of knowledge that should receive special attention in education. Secondly, the article elaborates - based on Peirce's semiotic - an epistemologically reflected semiotic model to describe the role and conditions of knowledge.