Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Stephen C. Angle

Harmony

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Ethics and Political Philosophy

Review Of Li, The Confucian Philosophy Of Harmony, Stephen C. Angle Dec 2013

Review Of Li, The Confucian Philosophy Of Harmony, Stephen C. Angle

Stephen C. Angle

The core argument of Chengyang Li’s new book is that harmony—understood in particular through the categories of “deep harmony” and “creative tension”—is the central idea of classical Confucianism. Part I contains five chapters that collectively explore the “philosophical concept” of harmony; the five chapters in Part II examine “harmony in practice” by looking at the ways that harmony structures Confucian thinking about person, family, society, world, and cosmos. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony is a learned work, drawing on Li’s familiarity with a broader corpus of early Confucian texts than is often found in works on Confucian philosophy. I believe …


Review Of Li, The Confucian Philosophy Of Harmony, Stephen C. Angle Dec 2013

Review Of Li, The Confucian Philosophy Of Harmony, Stephen C. Angle

Stephen C. Angle

The core argument of Chengyang Li’s new book is that harmony—understood in particular through the categories of “deep harmony” and “creative tension”—is the central idea of classical Confucianism. Part I contains five chapters that collectively explore the “philosophical concept” of harmony; the five chapters in Part II examine “harmony in practice” by looking at the ways that harmony structures Confucian thinking about person, family, society, world, and cosmos. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony is a learned work, drawing on Li’s familiarity with a broader corpus of early Confucian texts than is often found in works on Confucian philosophy. I believe …


Reply To Critics [Of Sagehood], Stephen C. Angle Dec 2012

Reply To Critics [Of Sagehood], Stephen C. Angle

Stephen C. Angle

One could ask for no more generous yet stimulating a set of critics than Professors Swanton, Tiwald, and Marchal.1 In this short reply, I will take up each in turn.