Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Building (2)
- Indiana University School of Law (2)
- A.M. Strauss (1)
- Addison C. Harris Lecture (1)
- Building Dedication (1)
-
- Central Electric Contracting Company (1)
- Chief Justice Rehnquist (1)
- Chief Justice Taft (1)
- Chief Justice Warren (1)
- Cities & towns -- Conservation & restoration -- Law & legislation (1)
- Cultural capita (1)
- Dedication Ceremony (1)
- Earl Warren (1)
- Eggers and Higgins (1)
- Federal Judiciary (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal courts of law (1)
- Frits Loonsten (1)
- Gothic Style (1)
- Government regulation -- Social aspects (1)
- Hayes Brothers (1)
- Huber Hunt and Nichols (1)
- Indiana University (1)
- Institutional environment (1)
- Judges (1)
- Land use -- Law & legislation -- United States (1)
- Land-use regulations (1)
- Law & aesthetics (1)
- Law Building (1)
- Leon H. Wallace (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Architecture
Zoning As Taxidermy: Neighborhood Conservation Districts And The Regulation Of Aesthetics, Anika S. Lemar
Zoning As Taxidermy: Neighborhood Conservation Districts And The Regulation Of Aesthetics, Anika S. Lemar
Indiana Law Journal
Over the last thirty years, municipalities across the country have embraced neighborhood conservation districts, regulations that impose design standards at the neighborhood level. Despite their adoption in thirty-five states, in municipalities from Boise to Cambridge, neighborhood conservation districts have evaded critical analysis by legal scholars. By regulating features such as architectural style, roof angle, and maximum eave overhang, conservation districts purport to protect “neighborhood character” or “cultural stability.” Implicit in these regulations is the unsupported assumption that the essential feature of a neighborhood’s character is its architectural design at a single point in time. The unfortunate result is zoning as …
Building The Federal Judiciary (Literally And Legally): The Monuments Of Chief Justices Taft, Warren And Rehnquist, Judith Resnik
Building The Federal Judiciary (Literally And Legally): The Monuments Of Chief Justices Taft, Warren And Rehnquist, Judith Resnik
Indiana Law Journal
The “federal courts” took on their now familiar contours over the course of the twentieth century. Three chief justices—William Howard Taft, Earl Warren, and William Rehnquist—played pivotal roles in shaping the institutional, jurisprudential, and physical premises. Taft is well known for promoting a building to house the U.S. Supreme Court and for launching the administrative infrastructure that came to govern the federal courts. Earl Warren’s name has become the shorthand for a jurisprudential shift from state toward federal authority; the Warren Court offered an expansive understanding of the role federal courts could play in enabling access for a host of …
Gothic Style Of Law Building Not 'Dismal'
In Appreciation On The Occasion Of The Dedication Of The Law Building
In Appreciation On The Occasion Of The Dedication Of The Law Building
Law School Building
No abstract provided.