Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Urban Studies and Planning Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2016

Series

Cuyahoga County

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Urban Studies and Planning

The Vote For Trump/Pence In Cuyahoga County, By Race/Ethnicity And Educational Attainment, Mark J. Salling Phd, Gisp, Robert Gleeson Nov 2016

The Vote For Trump/Pence In Cuyahoga County, By Race/Ethnicity And Educational Attainment, Mark J. Salling Phd, Gisp, Robert Gleeson

All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications

No abstract provided.


Who Votes Early In-Person In Cuyahoga County?, Mark J. Salling Phd, Gisp, Robert Gleeson Nov 2016

Who Votes Early In-Person In Cuyahoga County?, Mark J. Salling Phd, Gisp, Robert Gleeson

All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications

No abstract provided.


Cuyahoga Countywide Housing Study: County Planning, Kathryn W. Hexter Aug 2016

Cuyahoga Countywide Housing Study: County Planning, Kathryn W. Hexter

All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications

For many communities in the industrial Midwest, the changing economy has resulted in population loss. Combined with changes in population settlement, housing preferences, and demographics, Cuyahoga County is now faced with an oversupply of housing mismatched to the needs of current and future households. To address this disparity, the County is performing a housing study that will address the full needs of our communities: new construction where warranted, rehabilitation where feasible, and demolition where necessary.


Center For Population Dynamics Quarterly Brief July 2016: Population Loss And Development Trends In Cleveland, Richey Piiparinen, Jim Russell, Charlie Post, Kyle Fee Jul 2016

Center For Population Dynamics Quarterly Brief July 2016: Population Loss And Development Trends In Cleveland, Richey Piiparinen, Jim Russell, Charlie Post, Kyle Fee

All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications

When a place loses population, it’s assumed that’s because people leave. But it’s not that simple. What’s lost in translation is today’s households have fewer people living in them than they did years prior. For instance, 40% of mothers aged 40 to 44 had four or more children in 1976. Today, it’s 14%. Overall, the average American household contracted from 3.14 people in 1970 to 2.54 today. This can explain the apparent paradox of population loss in “shrinking” communities while the number of occupied households grows.

Such was the case in Cuyahoga County. There were 1.72 million residents in the …