Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Air quality (1)
- Air quality standards (1)
- Aministrative Law (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
-
- EPA (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Environmental policy and regulation (1)
- Environmental regulation (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Law and Technology (1)
- National Ambient Air Quality Standards (1)
- Pollution (1)
- Program evaluation (1)
- Public health (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Risk Management (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Environmental Policy
Evaluating Environmental Policies, Lori Snyder Bennear, Cary Coglianese
Evaluating Environmental Policies, Lori Snyder Bennear, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
For too long, environmental policymaking has relied on trial and error, without adequate or systematic learning from either the trials or the errors. Systematic program evaluation research has been remarkably scarce relative to the overall number of environmental policies adopted in the United States, as well as relative to the amount of evaluation research found in other fields, such as medicine, education, or transportation safety. This paper examines the role that program evaluation should play in environmental policy making, distinguishing such research from other types of analysis, including risk assessment, cost-effectiveness analysis, and cost-benefit analysis. It explains the kinds of …
Shifting Sands: The Limits Of Science In Setting Risk Standards, Cary Coglianese, Gary E. Marchant
Shifting Sands: The Limits Of Science In Setting Risk Standards, Cary Coglianese, Gary E. Marchant
All Faculty Scholarship
Regulators need to rely on science to understand problems and predict the consequences of regulatory actions, but over reliance on science can actually contribute to, or at least deflect attention from, incoherent policymaking. In this article, we explore the problems with using science to justify policy decisions by analyzing the Environmental Protection Agency's recently revised air quality standards for ground-level ozone and particulate matter, some of the most significant regulations ever issued. In revising these standards, EPA mistakenly invoked science as the exclusive basis for its decisions and deflected attention from a remarkable series of inconsistencies. For example, even though …
The Epa's Risky Reasoning, Cary Coglianese, Gary E. Marchant
The Epa's Risky Reasoning, Cary Coglianese, Gary E. Marchant
All Faculty Scholarship
Regulators must rely on science to understand problems and predict the consequences of regulatory actions, but science by itself cannot justify public policy decisions. We review the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to justify recent changes to its National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and particulate matter, showing how the agency was able to cloak its policy judgments under the guise of scientific objectivity. By doing so, the EPA evaded accountability for a shifting and incoherent set of policy positions that will have major implications for public health and the economy. For example, even though EPA claimed to base …