Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Asch (1)
- Communication (1)
- Communicative action (1)
- Conformity (1)
- Critical theory (1)
-
- Culture (1)
- Deaf (1)
- Deviance (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Hard of hearing (1)
- Leaders (1)
- Leadership (1)
- Lived experiences (1)
- Marginalization (1)
- Mass communication (1)
- Milgram (1)
- Noelle-Neumann (1)
- Phenomenology (1)
- Qualitative (1)
- Sanction (1)
- Self-censorship (1)
- Social change (1)
- Social psychology (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Spiral of silence (1)
- Storytelling (1)
- Vested interest (1)
- Voice (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social Psychology
Sustaining Voice Through Leadership: How Do Deaf Leaders Sustain Voice In Challenging Dominant Systems, Darlene Goncz Zangara
Sustaining Voice Through Leadership: How Do Deaf Leaders Sustain Voice In Challenging Dominant Systems, Darlene Goncz Zangara
Antioch University Full-Text Dissertations & Theses
The vehicle in communicating cultural identity, recognition, and justice is voice. Reclaiming or sustaining one's voice is to stand up for what one believes in, or to preserve one's identity and place in society. The deaf individual or any other marginalized individual is expected to proceed through a series of deliberations to determine favorable actions that will be persuasive, with the goal of embracing the voice of the marginalized. The deaf individual's voice or meaningful intentions will need to be effectively interpreted into mainstream American society's language and paradigms. This requires one to reconstruct the meanings and mediate the facts …
A Qualitative Approach To Spiral Of Silence Research: Self-Censorship Narratives Regarding Environmental And Social Conflict, Christopher John Ryan
A Qualitative Approach To Spiral Of Silence Research: Self-Censorship Narratives Regarding Environmental And Social Conflict, Christopher John Ryan
Antioch University Full-Text Dissertations & Theses
The purpose of this research is to seek narratives of self-censorship from in-depth interviews of 19 participants acquired through a purposive (criterion) sampling protocol. The primary research question driving this study is “What types of sanctions contribute to people choosing to self-censor their strongly held beliefs, values, and opinions.” Previous research conducted on the topic of self-censorship (generally under the rubric of the spiral of silence theory) has been predominantly quantitative and consideration of sanctions influencing self-censorship have been limited to fear of social isolation. I suggest that ostensibly important sanction variables have not been utilized within these existing frameworks. …