Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2005

Economics

Faculty of Commerce - Papers (Archive)

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences

Ranking Australian Economics Departments By Research Productivity, Frank V. Neri, Joan R. Rodgers Jan 2005

Ranking Australian Economics Departments By Research Productivity, Frank V. Neri, Joan R. Rodgers

Faculty of Commerce - Papers (Archive)

This study ranks Australian economics departments according to the average research productivity of their academic staff during 1996-2002. It also ranks departments according to the variability of research productivity among their members, the assumption being that, ceteris paribus, the less variable is productivity within a department, the better. Research productivity is found to be highly skewed within all departments. A few departments have high average research productivity because of just one or two highly productive members. However, in general, research productivity is more evenly distributed within those departments that have relatively high average research productivity than within departments with relatively …


The Double Paradox Of Elementary Economics Education, Jorge E. Fernandez-Pol, P. Carroll Jan 2005

The Double Paradox Of Elementary Economics Education, Jorge E. Fernandez-Pol, P. Carroll

Faculty of Commerce - Papers (Archive)

Elementary economics textbooks have become less attractive to students requiring only an introduction to economics, given that their content is pervaded by mathematical diagrams and simple equations. Also they are of relatively little value to those interested in, for example, attempting to gain an understanding of the New Economy, for they rarely emphasise business innovation and its crucial dynamic role. These factors engender something of a double paradox. First, the paradox of the tools and the audience, newcomers are frequently ‘turned off’ by existing economics textbooks, due to the pervasive use of mathematics. Second, the paradox of the content and …