Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Creating An Individual Events Judging Philosophy, Jeff Przybylo
Creating An Individual Events Judging Philosophy, Jeff Przybylo
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events
What is an I.E. Judging Philosophy? It is a series of written statements concerning how the judge views Individual Events in general, variables in each events, and views concerning decision-making. It is a tool that judges, coaches, and graduate assistants can use to develop their views and attitudes concerning judging criteria. In addition, it can serve as a discussion starter for forensics classes, conferences, and graduate assistant training sessions. It is not intended to be shared with competitors ( as in debate).
Creating Space For The Physically Challenged Competitor In Individual Events, David L. Kosloski
Creating Space For The Physically Challenged Competitor In Individual Events, David L. Kosloski
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events
Recently I have written about the challenges of creating a space for physically challenged students in individual events competition (Kosloski, 1994). My research suggests that attitudes and inexperience among coaches and critics are preventing the total integration of physically challenged students into the forensics activity. Many coaches have admitted that while they will not discourage students with disabilities from participating in forensics, certain barriers make such participation difficult, if not impossible. These barriers include budget constraints, building/room accessibility, transportation, peer rejection, and judging concerns, among others. While increasing gender and minority diversity in forensics has recently been given much needed …
Challenges And Opportunities For Forensics Programs: Offering Debate And Individual Events, Edward A. Hinck
Challenges And Opportunities For Forensics Programs: Offering Debate And Individual Events, Edward A. Hinck
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events
The purpose of this paper is to inquire into the forces that might account for this shift in the focus of programs, to consider some of the values served by broad-based programs, and identify some of the challenges faced by directors of programs that strive to offer opportunities in both debate and individual events. Despite some sentiment that narrowly focused programs deliver the greatest degree of educational impact for the resources invested, in some instances broad-based programs might play a central role in the educational mission of a department or college. On these grounds, the forensic community should embrace diversity …
Understanding The Hyphen: Addressing The Debate-Ie Divide, Brian Swafford
Understanding The Hyphen: Addressing The Debate-Ie Divide, Brian Swafford
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events
At the 2008 National Forensics Association National Championship Tournament, a special meeting was held for the coaches of Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debaters. At this meeting, those in attendance attempted to voice concerns about both the perceived "slights" and the actual structures in place (like sweepstakes formulas, awards, and qualifications) from the larger NFA community, made up of individual events (IE) coaches. Issues like limited judge strikes or mutually preferred judging, changing the schedule so that debaters did not go first and last on competition days, and allowing for oral comments by judges were all discussed. But at the heart of this …
Performing For The Audience: Putting The Public Back Into Individual Events Training, Scott Wells, Denee Janda
Performing For The Audience: Putting The Public Back Into Individual Events Training, Scott Wells, Denee Janda
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events
Forensics would benefit from utilizing more nontraditional judges at tournaments. The paper argues for creating more diverse judging pools. Specifically, the benefits and challenges of including community judges are addressed. Although the issue of including more nontraditional judges has been raised in the literature on debate, there has been less discussion in the Individual Events community.