Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (7)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- American Politics (2)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (2)
-
- Political Science (2)
- Anthropology (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communication (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Education Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication (1)
- International Law (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Race and Ethnicity (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Social and Cultural Anthropology (1)
- Sociology (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Cross Burning, Cockfighting, And Symbolic Meaning: Toward A First Amendment Ethnography, Timothy Zick
Cross Burning, Cockfighting, And Symbolic Meaning: Toward A First Amendment Ethnography, Timothy Zick
Timothy Zick
No abstract provided.
Toward Cantankerous Community: A Review Of The Rooster's Egg: On The Persistence Of Prejudice, Cynthia V. Ward
Toward Cantankerous Community: A Review Of The Rooster's Egg: On The Persistence Of Prejudice, Cynthia V. Ward
Cynthia V. Ward
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Reconstructing Liberalism, Cynthia V. Ward
Introduction: Reconstructing Liberalism, Cynthia V. Ward
Cynthia V. Ward
No abstract provided.
Women And War, Linda A. Malone
Seeking Reconciliation Of Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity, And Humanitarian Intervention (Introduction To Special Project: Humanitarian Intervention And Kosovo), Linda A. Malone
Linda A. Malone
No abstract provided.
Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
Members of Congress largely acquiesce to judicial supremacy both on constitutional and statutory interpretation questions. Lawmakers, however, do not formally embrace judicial supremacy; they rarely think about the courts when enacting legislation. This Article explains why this is so, focusing on why lawmakers have both strong incentive to acquiesce to judicial power and little incentive to advance a coherent view of congressional power. In particular, lawmakers are interested in advancing favored policies, winning reelection, and gaining personal power within Congress. Abstract questions of institutional power do not interest lawmakers and judicial defeats are seen as opportunities to find some other …
Budget Reform And The Balance Of Powers, Neal Devins
Budget Reform And The Balance Of Powers, Neal Devins
Neal E. Devins
No abstract provided.
The Promise Of Brown Forty Years Later: Introduction, Davison M. Douglas
The Promise Of Brown Forty Years Later: Introduction, Davison M. Douglas
Davison M. Douglas
No abstract provided.
Religion In The Public Square, Davison M. Douglas
Religion In The Public Square, Davison M. Douglas
Davison M. Douglas
No abstract provided.