Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences

Vol. 3, No. 2 Cover Nov 2017

Vol. 3, No. 2 Cover

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

No abstract provided.


Vol. 3, No. 2 Masthead Nov 2017

Vol. 3, No. 2 Masthead

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

No abstract provided.


Vol. 3, No. 2 Copyright Statement Nov 2017

Vol. 3, No. 2 Copyright Statement

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

No abstract provided.


Vol. 3, No. 2 Table Of Contents Nov 2017

Vol. 3, No. 2 Table Of Contents

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

No abstract provided.


Coal Power In Zambia: Time To Rethink, Prem Jain Nov 2017

Coal Power In Zambia: Time To Rethink, Prem Jain

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

Zambia has until recently relied almost 100% on hydropower for electricity generation. The first coal power plant in Zambian history was commissioned recently in 2016/17. An unprecedented power shortfall in 2016 prompted the Zambian government to diversify its energy sources by planning to go into solar and increased coal power. Coal causes high levels of pollution, degrades the environment, damages people’s health and causes climate change. Solar and other renewable sources of energy are clean. The cost of power from renewable energy is now competitive with that of coal power. Coal power is on the decline worldwide and renewable power …


Fundamental Rights Not So Fundamental? Critique Of The Supreme Court Judgment In Law Association Of Zambia V. The Attorney General, Muna B. Ndulo, Samuel Ngure Ndungu Nov 2017

Fundamental Rights Not So Fundamental? Critique Of The Supreme Court Judgment In Law Association Of Zambia V. The Attorney General, Muna B. Ndulo, Samuel Ngure Ndungu

Southern African Journal of Policy and Development

The article discusses the constitutionality of sections 5 and 6 of the Public Order Act of Zambia. The Law Association of Zambia had unsuccessfully argued in the High Court of Zambia that the sections violated section 20 (Freedom of expression) and 21 (Freedom of assembly) of the Zambian Constitution. The Supreme Court of Zambia upheld the decision of the High Court and held that the sections did not violate sections 20 and 21 of the constitution and were constitutional. This article argues that the Supreme Court decision is wrong and falls short of effectively protecting citizen’s rights of peaceful assembly …