Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Multiple Speed Assessments: Theory, Practice, And Research Evidence, Christoph N. Herde, Filip Lievens
Multiple Speed Assessments: Theory, Practice, And Research Evidence, Christoph N. Herde, Filip Lievens
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
This paper presents Multiple Speed Assessments as an umbrella term to encompass a variety of approaches that include multiple (e.g., 20), short (e.g., 3 min), and often integrated interpersonal simulations to elicit overt behavior in a standardized way across participants. Multiple Speed Assessments can be used to get insight into the behavioral repertoire of a target person in situations sampled from a predefined target domain and their intraindividual variability across these situations. This paper outlines the characteristics and theoretical basis of Multiple Speed Assessments. We also discuss various already existing examples of Multiple Speed Assessments (Objective Structured Clinical Examinations, Multiple …
Optimizing The Validity Of Situational Judgment Tests: The Importance Of Scoring Methods, Qingxiong Weng, Hui Yang, Filip Lievens, Michael A. Mcdaniel
Optimizing The Validity Of Situational Judgment Tests: The Importance Of Scoring Methods, Qingxiong Weng, Hui Yang, Filip Lievens, Michael A. Mcdaniel
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
In recent years, situational judgment tests (SJTs) have made strong inroads in assessment practices. Despite the importance of scoring for the validity of SJTs, little attention has been paid to different SJT scoring methods. This study investigated the influence of scoring methods on the criterion-related validity of SJTs. We examined five different consensus scoring methods (i.e., raw, standardized, dichotomous, mode, and proportion scoring) and several integrated scoring methods for scoring the same SJT. Results showed that one of the most popular scoring approaches (raw consensus scoring) is associated with an extreme response tendency and yields the lowest scale validity of …
Guidelines And Ethical Considerations For Assessment Center Operations, Deborah E. Rupp, Brian J Hoffman, David Bischof, William Byham, Lynn Collins, Alyssa Gibbons, Shinichi Hirose, Martin Kleinmann, Jeffrey D. Kudisch, Martin Lanik, Duncan J. R. Jackson, Myungjoon Kim, Filip Lievens, Deon Meiring, Klaus G. Melchers, Vina G. Pendit, Dan J. Putka, Nigel Povah, Doug Reynolds, Sandra Schlebusch
Guidelines And Ethical Considerations For Assessment Center Operations, Deborah E. Rupp, Brian J Hoffman, David Bischof, William Byham, Lynn Collins, Alyssa Gibbons, Shinichi Hirose, Martin Kleinmann, Jeffrey D. Kudisch, Martin Lanik, Duncan J. R. Jackson, Myungjoon Kim, Filip Lievens, Deon Meiring, Klaus G. Melchers, Vina G. Pendit, Dan J. Putka, Nigel Povah, Doug Reynolds, Sandra Schlebusch
Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business
This document’s intended purpose is to provide professional guidelines and ethical considerations for users of the assessment center method. These guidelines are designed to cover both existing and future applications. The title assessment center is restricted to those methods that follow these guidelines.