Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment (2)
- Jury (2)
- Psychology (2)
- 543 U.S. 220 (2005) (1)
- Attorney Conducted Voir Dire (1)
-
- Behavioral Sciences (1)
- CAPITAL punishment (1)
- Capital Juries (1)
- Capital Jury Project (1)
- Career-offender guideline (1)
- Closure (Psychology) (1)
- Constitutional review; judicial review; constitutional court; supreme court; legislative review; constitutionalism; comparative constitutionalism; comparative law (1)
- Criminal Guilt (1)
- DEFENSE (Criminal procedure) (1)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Death Penalty Decision (1)
- Death Penalty Proceedings (1)
- Eliminating Circuit-Split Disparities (1)
- Empirical Psychological Research (1)
- Evaluation of Gault (1)
- Federal Sentencing (1)
- Guilt (1)
- In re Gault (1)
- JURY (1)
- Judge Conducted Voir Dire (1)
- Juries (1)
- Juror Self-Disclosure (1)
- Juror's Personal Responsibility (1)
- Juvenile Court Proceedings (1)
- Kent v. United States (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Models Of Pre-Promulgation Review Of Legislation, Rachel Myers
Models Of Pre-Promulgation Review Of Legislation, Rachel Myers
Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design
Pre-promulgation review seeks to harmonize legislation with the constitution by engaging in a dialogue among government institutions that seeks to prevent unconstitutional legislation from becoming law. Pre-promulgation review is an integral part of the lawmaking process, and this study seeks to unite scholarship on different methods of this review in a comparative survey to assist lawyers, policymakers, and scholars. A wide range of institutions may fulfill the function of reviewing proposed legislation for compliance with the constitution or other codes of national importance prior to their passage into law. Because of this diversity, scholarship on the topic of pre-promulgation review …
Eliminating Circuit-Split Disparities In Federal Sentencing Under The Post-Booker Guidelines, Elliot Edwards
Eliminating Circuit-Split Disparities In Federal Sentencing Under The Post-Booker Guidelines, Elliot Edwards
Indiana Law Journal
This Note will explore the rarely discussed consequences that result when courts of appeals freely interpret the Sentencing Guidelines. This Note will not address appellate review of sentences in general, nor will it discuss disparities caused by trial courts. Instead, the discussion below will address a very specific situation, namely when a court of appeals vacates a sentence because, in its estimation, the trial court misapplied the Guidelines. Part I will relate the history of the recent sentencing re-form movement in America, noting particularly which bodies have the authority to decide sentencing policy. Part II will then analyze the interpretive …
"Why Rebottle The Genie?": Capitalizing On Closure In Death Penalty Proceedings, Jody L. Madeira
"Why Rebottle The Genie?": Capitalizing On Closure In Death Penalty Proceedings, Jody L. Madeira
Indiana Law Journal
Closure, though a term with great rhetorical force in the capital punishment context, has to date evaded systematic analysis, instead becoming embroiled in ideological controversy. For victims who have rubbed the rights lamp for years, inclusion in capital proceedings and accompanying closure opportunities are perceived as a force with the potential to grant wishes of peace and finality. Scholars, however, argue for rebottling the closure genie lest closure itself prove false or its pursuit violate a defendant's constitutional rights. In order to effectively appraise the relationship of closure to criminal jurisprudence, however, and thus to decide whether and to what …
A Psychologist's Perspective On Capital Juries, Steven J. Sherman
A Psychologist's Perspective On Capital Juries, Steven J. Sherman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Toward A Model Death Penalty Code: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report.
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
The Limits Of A Scientific Jurisprudence: The Supreme Court And Psychology, J. Alexander Tanford
The Limits Of A Scientific Jurisprudence: The Supreme Court And Psychology, J. Alexander Tanford
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Juror Self-Disclosure In The Voir Dire: A Social Science Analysis, David Suggs, Bruce D. Sales
Juror Self-Disclosure In The Voir Dire: A Social Science Analysis, David Suggs, Bruce D. Sales
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
An Evaluation Of Gault By A Sociologist, Albert K. Cohen
An Evaluation Of Gault By A Sociologist, Albert K. Cohen
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium on Juvenile Problems: In re Gault
Social Meaning Of Legal Concepts - Criminal Guilt, Jerome Hall
Social Meaning Of Legal Concepts - Criminal Guilt, Jerome Hall
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.