Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Post-Acquisition Hyperpolarized 29silicon Mr Image Processing For Visualization Of Colorectal Lesions Using A User-Friendly Graphical Interface, Caitlin V Mccowan, Duncan Salmon, Jingzhe Hu, Shivanand Pudakalakatti, Nicholas Whiting, Jennifer S Davis, Daniel D Carson, Niki M Zacharias, Pratip K Bhattacharya, Mary C Farach-Carson
Post-Acquisition Hyperpolarized 29silicon Mr Image Processing For Visualization Of Colorectal Lesions Using A User-Friendly Graphical Interface, Caitlin V Mccowan, Duncan Salmon, Jingzhe Hu, Shivanand Pudakalakatti, Nicholas Whiting, Jennifer S Davis, Daniel D Carson, Niki M Zacharias, Pratip K Bhattacharya, Mary C Farach-Carson
Faculty Scholarship for the College of Science & Mathematics
Medical imaging devices often use automated processing that creates and displays a self-normalized image. When improperly executed, normalization can misrepresent information or result in an inaccurate analysis. In the case of diagnostic imaging, a false positive in the absence of disease, or a negative finding when disease is present, can produce a detrimental experience for the patient and diminish their health prospects and prognosis. In many clinical settings, a medical technical specialist is trained to operate an imaging device without sufficient background information or understanding of the fundamental theory and processes involved in image creation and signal processing. Here, we …
An Empirical Look At The Controversy Surrounding The Nobel Prize For Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anthony Breitzman
An Empirical Look At The Controversy Surrounding The Nobel Prize For Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anthony Breitzman
Faculty Scholarship for the College of Science & Mathematics
Disputes between researchers over who deserves credit for technological breakthroughs are not unusual. Few such disputes, however, have attracted as much attention as the arguments surrounding the award of the 2003 Nobel Prize for Medicine. This prize was awarded to Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield to honor “discoveries concerning the development of magnetic resonance imaging” – i.e. MRI. Soon after the award, another scientist, Raymond Damadian, took out full-page advertisements in national newspapers, decrying the award and stating that he should have been included alongside Lauterbur and Mansfield. This technical report examines Damadian’s claim from a strictly empirical perspective, by …