Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Mathematics

Theoretical and Behavioral Foundations of Education Faculty Publications

2003

Meta-analysis

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Physical Sciences and Mathematics

You Think You’Ve Got Trivials?, Shlomo S. Sawilowsky May 2003

You Think You’Ve Got Trivials?, Shlomo S. Sawilowsky

Theoretical and Behavioral Foundations of Education Faculty Publications

Effect sizes are important for power analysis and meta-analysis. This has led to a debate on reporting effect sizes for studies that are not statistically significant. Contrary and supportive evidence has been offered on the basis of Monte Carlo methods. In this article, clarifications are given regarding what should be simulated to determine the possible effects of piecemeal publishing trivial effect sizes.


Trivials: The Birth, Sale, And Final Production Of Meta-Analysis, Shlomo S. Sawilowsky May 2003

Trivials: The Birth, Sale, And Final Production Of Meta-Analysis, Shlomo S. Sawilowsky

Theoretical and Behavioral Foundations of Education Faculty Publications

The structure of the first invited debate in JMASM is to present a target article (Sawilowsky, 2003), provide an opportunity for a response (Roberts & Henson, 2003), and to follow with independent comments from noted scholars in the field (Knapp, 2003; Levin & Robinson, 2003). In this rejoinder, I provide a correction and a clarification in an effort to bring some closure to the debate. The intension, however, is not to rehash previously made points, even where I disagree with the response of Roberts & Henson (2003).