Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medical Specialties Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Department of Urology Faculty Papers

Series

2012

Adult

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Medical Specialties

Prevention Of Stone Migration With The Accordion During Endoscopic Ureteral Lithotripsy., Christopher J Pagnani, Magdy El Akkad, Demetrius H Bagley May 2012

Prevention Of Stone Migration With The Accordion During Endoscopic Ureteral Lithotripsy., Christopher J Pagnani, Magdy El Akkad, Demetrius H Bagley

Department of Urology Faculty Papers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endoscopic lithotripsy is often prolonged secondary to the retrograde migration of calculous fragments. Various balloons, baskets, and other devices have been used to prevent this migration. Our purpose is to analyze the effect of the Accordion(®) on stone migration and overall efficiency during lithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 21 patients with a total of 23 distal ureteral stones. Patients underwent lithotripsy using an endoscopic impact lithotriptor. The Accordion was randomly used in 11 of these 21 patients. Data were collected regarding stone migration, stone size, stone ablation, ureteral clearing, and lengths of time for various …


Robotic-Assistance Does Not Enhance Standard Laparoscopic Technique For Right-Sided Donor Nephrectomy., Xiaolong S Liu, Hadley W Narins, Warren R Maley, Adam M Frank, Costas D. Lallas Apr 2012

Robotic-Assistance Does Not Enhance Standard Laparoscopic Technique For Right-Sided Donor Nephrectomy., Xiaolong S Liu, Hadley W Narins, Warren R Maley, Adam M Frank, Costas D. Lallas

Department of Urology Faculty Papers

OBJECTIVE: To examine donor and recipient outcomes after right-sided robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN) compared with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and to determine whether robotic-assistance enhances LDN.

MATERIALS & METHODS: From December 2005 to January 2011, 25 patients underwent right-sided LDN or RALDN. An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed of both donor and recipient medical charts. Primary endpoints included both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS: Twenty right-sided LDNs and 5 RALDNs were performed during the study period. Neither estimated blood loss (76.4 mL vs. 30 mL, P = .07) nor operative time (231 min vs. 218 min, P = …