Diseases Commons^™

Screening Colonoscopy And Risk For Incident Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis In Average-Risk Adults: A Nested Case-Control Study, Chyke Doubeni, Sheila Weinmann, Kenneth Adams, Aruna Kamineni, Diana Buist, Arlene Ash, Carolyn Rutter, V. Paul Doria-Rose, Douglas Corley, Robert Greenlee, Jessica Chubak, Andrew Williams, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Eric Johnson, Joseph Webster, Kathryn Richert-Boe, Theodore Levin, Robert Fletcher, Noel Weiss

Chyke A. Doubeni

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in average-risk adults is uncertain, particularly for right colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: Four U.S. health plans. PATIENTS: 1039 average-risk adults enrolled for at least 5 years in one of the health plans. Case patients were aged 55 to 85 years on their diagnosis date (reference date) of stage IIB or higher (late-stage) CRC during 2006 to 2008. One or 2 control patients were selected for each case patient, matched on birth year, sex, health plan, …

Factors Associated With Inadequate Colorectal Cancer Screening With Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Adeyinka Laiyemo, Chyke Doubeni, Paul Pinsky, V. Paul Doria-Rose, Andrew Sanderson, Robert Bresalier, Joel Weissfeld, Robert Schoen, Pamela Marcus, Phillip Prorok, Christine Berg

Chyke A. Doubeni

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Inadequate colorectal cancer screening wastes limited endoscopic resources. We examined patients factors associated with inadequate flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG) screening at baseline screening and repeat screening 3-5 years later in 10 geographically-dispersed screening centers participating in the ongoing Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

METHODS: A total of 64,554 participants (aged 55-74) completed baseline questionnaires and underwent FSG at baseline. Of these, 39,385 participants returned for repeat screening. We used logistic regression models to assess factors that are associated with inadequate FSG (defined as a study in which the depth of insertion of FSG was …

Contribution Of Behavioral Risk Factors And Obesity To Socioeconomic Differences In Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Chyke Doubeni, Jacqueline Major, Adeyinka Laiyemo, Mario Schootman, Ann Zauber, Albert Hollenbeck, Rashmi Sinha, Jeroan Allison

Chyke A. Doubeni

BACKGROUND:Health behaviors are known risk factors for colorectal cancer and are more common in low socioeconomic status (SES) populations. We evaluated the extent to which behavioral risk factors and body mass index (BMI) explain SES disparities in colorectal cancer incidence, overall and by tumor location.

METHODS: We analyzed prospective National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study data on 506 488 participants who were recruited in 1995-1996 from six US states and two metropolitan areas and followed through 2006. Detailed baseline data on risk factors for colorectal cancer, including health behaviors, were obtained using questionnaires. SES was measured by self-reported …

Variation Of Adenoma Prevalence By Age, Sex, Race, And Colon Location In A Large Population: Implications For Screening And Quality Programs, Douglas Corley, Christopher Jensen, Amy Marks, Wei Zhao, Jolanda De Boer, Theodore Levin, Chyke Doubeni, Bruce Fireman, Charles Quesenberry

Chyke A. Doubeni

BACKGROUND and AIMS: Reliable community-based colorectal adenoma prevalence estimates are needed to inform colonoscopy quality standards and to estimate patient colorectal cancer risks; however, minimal data exist from populations with large numbers of diverse patients and examiners. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of adenomas detected by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and colon location among 20,792 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members >/=50 years of age who received a screening colonoscopy exam (102 gastroenterologists, years 2006-2008). RESULTS: Prevalence of detected adenomas increased more rapidly with age in the proximal colon (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-2.80; 70-74 vs 50-54 …