Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Life Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

South Dakota State University

Series

1992

Feedlot

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Life Sciences

Comparison Of Production Efficiencies When Calves Are Fed In South Dakota Or Texas, R. H. Pritchard, R. L. Preston Jan 1992

Comparison Of Production Efficiencies When Calves Are Fed In South Dakota Or Texas, R. H. Pritchard, R. L. Preston

South Dakota Beef Report, 1992

South Dakota's reputation for harsh winters is frequently cited as a limitation to our competitiveness in cattle feeding. To help quantify the impact of climate on cattle feeding, heifers produced in western South Dakota were fed in eastern South Dakota or in the Texas panhandle. Heifer calves were obtained from two ranches, assembled at SDSU, and sorted into three similar groups. Group 1 remained at the SDSU feedlot, Group 2 was shipped half-way to Texas and returned to SDSU, and Group 3 was sent on to Texas for feeding. These groups allow consideration of climate and transit stress on feedlot …


Implant Combinations And Reimplanting Strategies For Yearling Steers Fed High Concentrate Diets, R. H. Pritchard, M. A. Robbins, D. H. Gee Jan 1992

Implant Combinations And Reimplanting Strategies For Yearling Steers Fed High Concentrate Diets, R. H. Pritchard, M. A. Robbins, D. H. Gee

South Dakota Beef Report, 1992

Crossbred yearling steers were used to determine the relative efficacy of specific anabolic implant combinations and sequences on feedlot performance and carcass traits. Steers were fed a high concentrate finishing diet for 112 days. lmplanting was done on days 1 and 42 of the feeding period. lmplanting improved (P < .05) average daily gain (ADG) 22% and feed efficiency 15%. Implant treatment generally increased dry matter intake. Lmplanting increased (P<.05) the rib eye area of carcasses 6.5% and tended to cause a reduction in percentage choice carcasses. The percentage of abscessed implants ranged from < 1 % to 10%, depending on the type of implant used even though implant needles were disinfected between each use.