Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Water Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Irrigation

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 91 - 101 of 101

Full-Text Articles in Water Law

Irrigation With Non-Riparian Surface Water And Subterranean Water In Kentucky, George B. Baker Jr. Jan 1954

Irrigation With Non-Riparian Surface Water And Subterranean Water In Kentucky, George B. Baker Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Irrigation In Kentucky As Affected By The Law Of Riparian Rights, Hugh C. Evans Jan 1952

Irrigation In Kentucky As Affected By The Law Of Riparian Rights, Hugh C. Evans

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Waters And Watercourses - Riparian Rights In Streams Flowing Through Several States Nov 1936

Waters And Watercourses - Riparian Rights In Streams Flowing Through Several States

Michigan Law Review

A special master appointed by the Court after the filing of a bill by the state of Washington praying an injunction against the state of Oregon found that inhabitants of Oregon had been diverting water from the Walla Walla River, a non-navigable stream, by means of a dam for over fifty years for use in irrigating their lands which would otherwise be arid and had been for a long time pumping some nine thousand acre feet of water per annum from wells bored on their lands. The state of Washington claimed this diversion materially injured an irrigation project known as …


An Act For Maintenance And Operation On Newly Reclaimed Pueblo Indian Lands Per Act Of March 13, 1928, Congress Of The United States Aug 1935

An Act For Maintenance And Operation On Newly Reclaimed Pueblo Indian Lands Per Act Of March 13, 1928, Congress Of The United States

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


Amendments To Act Of March 13, 1928, Secretary Of The Interior May 1935

Amendments To Act Of March 13, 1928, Secretary Of The Interior

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


Letter Interpreting Contract With Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Under Act Of March 13, 1928, Office Of The Solicitor Of The Department Of Interior Feb 1935

Letter Interpreting Contract With Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Under Act Of March 13, 1928, Office Of The Solicitor Of The Department Of Interior

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


An Act To Pay For Needed Lands And Water Rights Under The Pueblo Lands Act, Congress Of The United States May 1933

An Act To Pay For Needed Lands And Water Rights Under The Pueblo Lands Act, Congress Of The United States

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


An Act Authorizing An Agreement With The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Providing For Irrigation, Etc. For The Pueblo Lands In The Rio Grande Valley, Congress Of The United States Mar 1928

An Act Authorizing An Agreement With The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Providing For Irrigation, Etc. For The Pueblo Lands In The Rio Grande Valley, Congress Of The United States

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


The Conservancy Act Of New Mexico, Congress Of The United States Mar 1927

The Conservancy Act Of New Mexico, Congress Of The United States

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


An Act To Authorize Reconnaissance Work With The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District To Determine Whether Certain Pueblo Lands Are Susceptible Of Reclamation, Drainage, And Irrigation, Congress Of The United States Feb 1927

An Act To Authorize Reconnaissance Work With The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District To Determine Whether Certain Pueblo Lands Are Susceptible Of Reclamation, Drainage, And Irrigation, Congress Of The United States

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


Waters And Water Courses - No Riparian Right In Montana, Evans Holbrook Jan 1922

Waters And Water Courses - No Riparian Right In Montana, Evans Holbrook

Articles

Plaintiff owned lands through which a stream flowed; defendant, by virtue of an appropriation duly made, diverted all the water in the stream and used it for irrigation purposes. Plaintiff, claiming only as a riparian owner, sued to enjoin defendant's diversion of the stream on the ground that it was an invasion of riparian rights. Held, that the common law doctrine of riparian rights does not prevail in Montana, and that plaintiff's complaint does not state a cause of action.