Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (184)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- DePaul University (25)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Association of American Law Schools (2)
-
- BLR (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (14)
- Copyright (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
-
- Investment (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Due process (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Antitrust (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Corporation (4)
- Corporations (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Public health (4)
- SEC (4)
- Securities (4)
- Securities Law (4)
- Taxation (4)
- Technology (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Agreement (3)
- Banking (3)
- Business Competition (3)
- Civil Law (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (25)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- ExpressO (2)
-
- Journal of Legal Education (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 351 of 351
Full-Text Articles in Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Historical Examination Of The Constitutionality Of The Federal Estate Tax, Henry Lowenstein, Kathryn Kisska-Schulze
A Historical Examination Of The Constitutionality Of The Federal Estate Tax, Henry Lowenstein, Kathryn Kisska-Schulze
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
In States We "Trust": Self-Settled Trusts, Public Policy, And Interstate Federalism, Brendan Duffy
In States We "Trust": Self-Settled Trusts, Public Policy, And Interstate Federalism, Brendan Duffy
Northwestern University Law Review
Over the last twenty years, domestic asset protection trusts have risen in popularity as a means of estate planning and asset protection. A domestic asset protection trust is an irrevocable trust formed under state law which enables an independent trustee to allocate money to a class of
persons, which includes the settlor.
Since Alaska first enacted domestic asset protection legislation in 1997, fifteen states have followed its lead. The case law over the last twenty years addressing these trust mechanisms has, however, been surprisingly sparse. A Washington bankruptcy court decision, In re Huber, altered this drought, but caused more confusion …
Introducing The Law Of Nonprofit Organizations And Philanthropy, David A. Brennen
Introducing The Law Of Nonprofit Organizations And Philanthropy, David A. Brennen
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
On January 5,2007, the Nonprofit and Philanthropy Law Section of AALS held its first program at the AALS Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. The program, entitled "State-Level Legal Reform of the Law of Nonprofit Organizations," was a fitting way to launch what should prove to be a valuable contribution to the study of law relating to nonprofit organizations and philanthropy. This burgeoning area of academic legal study is well poised to grow by leaps and bounds in the coming years due to its impact on many traditional areas of legal study, including tax law, corporate law, estate law, trust law, …
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Charities And The Constitution: Evaluating The Role Of Constitutional Principles In Determining The Scope Of Tax Law's Public Policy Limitation For Charities, David A. Brennen
Charities And The Constitution: Evaluating The Role Of Constitutional Principles In Determining The Scope Of Tax Law's Public Policy Limitation For Charities, David A. Brennen
Scholarly Works
This Article expands the discussion of whether tax-exempt charities, for constitutional law purposes, should be treated as government actors, as private actors or as something in between. While government actors are subject to constitutional law restrictions concerning discrimination and free speech, private non-government actors are not generally subject to these same restrictions. Although tax-exempt charities are often thought of as sovereigns and, thus, government-like, the fact remains that charities are private entities created to serve public purposes. As private entities, charities - like all other private entities - are not necessarily bound by constitutional law principles. Still, the many “public” …
Digging Up New Revenue: Retrospective Estate Taxation And The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, Michael George
Digging Up New Revenue: Retrospective Estate Taxation And The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, Michael George
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gift Or Loan Of State Money: Schulz V. State Of New York
Gift Or Loan Of State Money: Schulz V. State Of New York
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Graveyard Robbery In The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Of 1993: A Modern Look At The Constitutionality Of Retroactive Taxes, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 775 (1994), Andrew G. Schultz
Graveyard Robbery In The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Of 1993: A Modern Look At The Constitutionality Of Retroactive Taxes, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 775 (1994), Andrew G. Schultz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, Willard L. Boyd, Robert Meisenholder, Robert H. Skilton, Charles Seligson, Allan F. Smith, Charles L. B. Lowndes, Elvin E. Overton, Julio Cueto-Rua, W. Paul Gormley, John J. Yeager, James A. Rahl, Carl H. Fulda
Book Reviews, Willard L. Boyd, Robert Meisenholder, Robert H. Skilton, Charles Seligson, Allan F. Smith, Charles L. B. Lowndes, Elvin E. Overton, Julio Cueto-Rua, W. Paul Gormley, John J. Yeager, James A. Rahl, Carl H. Fulda
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, George H. Pickar, Edward L. Barrett Jr., Rudolph Heitz, Charles E. Corker, Warren M. Ballard, W. F. Zacharias, Stefan A. Riesenfeld, Julius Cohen, Charles A. Reynard, Robert Kingsley, Jacob D. Hyman, James Lake, Arthur W. Stokes, Francis A. Allen, Paul A. Freund, Richard W. Jennings, Joseph E. Goodbar, Kenneth Redden, James A. Rahl, Charles L. B. Lowndes
Book Reviews, George H. Pickar, Edward L. Barrett Jr., Rudolph Heitz, Charles E. Corker, Warren M. Ballard, W. F. Zacharias, Stefan A. Riesenfeld, Julius Cohen, Charles A. Reynard, Robert Kingsley, Jacob D. Hyman, James Lake, Arthur W. Stokes, Francis A. Allen, Paul A. Freund, Richard W. Jennings, Joseph E. Goodbar, Kenneth Redden, James A. Rahl, Charles L. B. Lowndes
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law--Double Inheritance Taxation--Interpleader By Interested State, J. P. R.
Constitutional Law--Double Inheritance Taxation--Interpleader By Interested State, J. P. R.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taxation-Procedural Devices For Preventing Multiple Taxation Of Intangibles Based On Domicile - Original Suit By Way Of Interpleader Before Supreme Court, Edmund O'Hare
Michigan Law Review
The famous Dorrance litigation raised very sharply the problem of avoiding multiple inheritance taxes based upon conflicting claims of domicile. Up to that time it was thought that the right of a state to levy an inheritance tax upon intangible personal property owned by a nonresident decedent had been effectively denied by Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota, Baldwin v. Missouri, and First National Bank of Boston v. Maine. But the Dorrance cases resulted in the collection of huge inheritance taxes by Pennsylvania and New Jersey, both states grounding their assessments upon the assertion that Dr. Dorrance …
Death Taxes On Completed Transfers Inter Vivos, Lorentz B. Knouff
Death Taxes On Completed Transfers Inter Vivos, Lorentz B. Knouff
Michigan Law Review
The subjection of transfers inter vivas to the death tax under each of the above categories has been based upon the proposition that, for a transfer inter vivas properly to be subject to the death tax, it must bear some reasonable relationship to transfers at death either by will or under the law relating to intestacy. This rule has been applied both in problems of statutory construction and in problems of constitutionality. The recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Helvering v. Bullard seems to have abandoned this test for the inclusion of transfers inter vivas within the …
Federal Gross Estate Tax-Constitutionality-Revocable Transfers By Way Of Trust
Federal Gross Estate Tax-Constitutionality-Revocable Transfers By Way Of Trust
Michigan Law Review
Five recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court, together with a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, have considerably changed some of the currently accepted theories regarding the taxability under the Federal Estate Tax of transfers reserving various degrees of control to donors, both with respect to what may be considered to be a sufficient reserved control and what the constitutional limits on the taxing power may be. Some perplexing questions have been settled by these decisions while others quite as vexing seem to have been raised and left for future determination.
Taxation-Constitutionality Of A Conclusive Presumption That A Transfer Executed Within A Limited Period Before Death Is Made In Contemplation Of Death
Michigan Law Review
Motion for a refund was made by the plaintiff on the ground that certain transfers made within two years preceding the death of the decedent should not have been taxed under the federal estate tax since they were not in fact made in contemplation of death. The defendant filed a demurrer on the ground that under the provisions of sec. 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, such transfers were taxable regardless of the motive impelling them. The section reads: "Where within two years prior to his death . . . and without such a consideration the decedent has …
Taxation - Constitutionality Of A Conclusive Presumption That A Transfer Executed Within A Limited Period Before Death Is Made In Contemplation Of Death
Michigan Law Review
Motion for a refund by the plaintiff on the ground that certain transfers made within two years of the death of the decedent should not have been subjected to the federal estate tax as they were not in fact made in contemplation of death. The defendant filed a statutory demurrer on the ground that section 302 of the Revenue Act as amended in 1926 (26 U. S. C. A. sec. 1049C) renders such property taxable irrespective of what impelled the transfer. The section reads, "Where within two years prior to his death and without consideration the decedent has made a …
Trusts--Exercise Of A Power With Consent Of Trustee-Retroactive Federal Inheritance Tax
Trusts--Exercise Of A Power With Consent Of Trustee-Retroactive Federal Inheritance Tax
Michigan Law Review
A trust, established in 1908, reserved a power to the settlor to alter or amend the provisions of the trust, conditioned on the assent of the trustee. 26 U. S. C. A. sec. 1094 (d), Rev. Act (1926) sec. 302 (d), which applied to trusts subject at the date of death to any change through the exercise of a power either by the decedent alone or in conjunction with any person, to alter, amend or revoke, was made retroactive by clause (h) of the same section. Held, since the transfer was complete before the death of the settler, section …