Tax Law Commons^™

Partnership Allocations: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You, Steven M. Friedman

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Client Alert- Irs Issues Safe Harbor Guidance For Partnership Flip Structures In Wind Deals

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Opportunities And Pitfalls Under Sections 351 And 721, Craig L. Rascoe, William M. Richardson

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Opportunities And Pitfalls Under Sections 351 And 721 (Slides), Craig L. Rascoe, William M. Richardson

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Tax Considerations Of Transfers To And Distributions From The C Or S Corporation, C. Wells Hall Iii

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Partnership Tax Allocation Provisions, Brian J. O'Connor

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Property And Liability Transfers To Partnerships: Built-In Gain Or Loss, Boot, And Disguised Sales, Andrea M. Whiteway

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp

ExpressO

The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.

Fiction, Form And Substance In Subchapter K -- Approaching Partnership Mergers, Divisions And Incorporations, Heather M. Field

ExpressO

The tax consequences of substantively equivalent partnership mergers, divisions and incorporations can vary dramatically depending on the form of the transaction. This disparate treatment arises because the tax analysis of these partnership transactions inconsistently adheres to the “form” of the transaction and limits the use of legal “fictions”. This part-form, part-fiction approach distorts parties’ incentives about whether and how to undertake such transactions and can make the transactions less efficient, all without materially advancing other policy goals. This result is exacerbated by non-tax business exigencies that restrict parties’ abilities to implement certain transaction forms and by the increase in “formless” …

The Partnership: Preserving Capital Gains On Real Estate Investments, Charles E. Mcwilliams

ExpressO

This paper considers the use of partnerships as an effective tool for preserving capital gains on real estate investments. For tax purposes, the Internal Revenue Service generally treats a limited liability company as a partnership. This form of organization is widely used for real estate investments, and by taking a few simple precautions an LLC may ensure that any gain on its investments in undeveloped real property will be treated as capital gains. Such treatment may reduce the LLC’s tax costs substantially.

The Fifth Circuit developed a framework that has proven invaluable for analyzing the activity of the LLC to …

Towards Equity And Efficiency In Partnership Allocations, Darryll K. Jones

Journal Publications

The primary goal of any tax system is to raise sufficient revenue for government. More precisely, taxation is the means by which government supplies necessary things not available from the private market. Taxation allows society to cure distributional imperfections in the market. It is appropriate, therefore, only to the extent that the market cannot provide goods and services for which there is public demand; if private markets equitably supplied food, shelter, health care, education, and common defense, taxes could be greatly reduced if not completely eliminated. The revenue raising goal is thwarted to the extent the taxing system is either …

Redemptions Of Partnership Interests And Divisions Of Partnerships, Andrea M. Whiteway

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor

ExpressO

No abstract provided.

The Missing Preferred Return, Victor Fleischer

ExpressO

Managers of buyout funds typically offer their investors an 8% preferred return on their investment before they take a share of any additional profits. Venture capitalists, on the other hand, rarely offer a preferred return. Instead, VCs take their cut from the first dollar of nominal profits. This disparity between venture funds and buyout funds is especially striking because the contracts that determine fund organization and compensation are otherwise very similar. The missing preferred return might suggest that agency costs pose a larger problem in venture capital than previously thought. Is the missing preferred return evidence, perhaps, that VCs are …

Family Limited Partnership Update, Farhad Aghdami

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Ancillary Joint Ventures And The Unanswered Questions After Revenue Ruling 2004-51, Gabriel O. Aitsebaomo

ExpressO

Ever since the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") issued Revenue Ruling 98-15… in which it emphasized "control" as a critical factor in determining whether a tax-exempt hospital that enters into a whole-hospital joint venture with a for-profit entity would continue to maintain its tax-exemption, practitioners and scholars alike have sought guidance from the Service regarding whether such "control" would also be required of an exempt organization that enters into an "ancillary joint venture" with a for-profit entity. In response, the Service issued Revenue Ruling 2004-51 on May 6, 2004.

… In Revenue Ruling 2004-51, the Service enunciated that a tax-exempt …

Proposed Regulations On Noncompensatory Options: A Light At The End Of The Tunnel, Walter D. Schwidetzky

All Faculty Scholarship

It has become increasingly common for partnerships to issue options. There is a dearth of authority on the federal tax treatment of options to acquire interests in partnerships. In this context, there are two main categories of options, services options and noncompensatory options. Services options, unsurprisingly, are options to acquire partnership interests where the option is received in exchange for services. Noncompensatory options cover the rest of the waterfront. The simplest version of the latter would be partnership analog to normal options found outside the partnership context: the option holder pays the partnership an option premium to acquire an option …

Analyzing The Noncompensatory Partnership Option Proposed Regulations, Dennis A. Diersen

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Options To Acquire Partnership Interests: Can The Tax Law Keep Pace?, Walter D. Schwidetzky

All Faculty Scholarship

It has become increasingly common for partnerships to issue options that give the holder the right to acquire an interest in the partnership for a set price. The holder of the option will exercise it if he feels that the partnership interest to be acquired is worth more than the exercise price. There is a dearth of authority on the federal tax treatment of option transactions, and the Service has recently asked for guidance from the tax bar as to what approach it should take. This article focuses on one piece of the partnership option puzzle, options to acquire partnership …

All In The Family (Partnership), Charles H. Egerton

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Selected Tax Issues For Pass-Through Entities, Charles H. Egerton, Samuel P. Starr

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

A Practical Guide To The Tax Consequences Of Disposing Of A Partnership (Or Llc) Business, Richard M. Lipton, John T. Thomas

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Case Studies: Small Professional Services Organization And Large Professional Services Organization, L. Michael Gracik Jr.

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Planning Opportunities Remain Under The Final Partnership Allocation Rules For Contributed Property, Michael G. Frankel, Leslie H. Loffman, Sanford C. Presant

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Meeting With Irs Regarding Partnership Issues In Developing Section 1017 Regulations, Blake D. Rubin

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Partnership Workouts: Problems And Solutions Under Final Section 704(B) And 752 Regulations, Michael G. Frankel, Charles H. Coffin

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Allocation Of Nonrecourse Liabilities: Irs Takes Two Steps Forward, One Back, J. D. Dell, Michael G. Frankel, Leslie H. Loffman, Sanford C. Presant, Blake D. Rubin

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Case Studies: Scenarios Nos. 1, 2 & 3, Thomas R. Frantz

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Planning For The Termination Of An Interest In A Partnership - Withdrawals, Distributions And Other Exit Strategies, Michael G. Frankel

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Federal Taxation On Disposition Of Partnership Interests, Richard A. Shaw

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.