Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (70)
- Legal History (38)
- Jurisprudence (30)
- Judges (22)
- Law and Politics (15)
-
- Law and Society (14)
- Courts (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Law and Philosophy (9)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Common Law (6)
- Law and Race (6)
- Legal Biography (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Legal Writing and Research (5)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (5)
- Second Amendment (5)
- American Politics (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Political Science (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (20)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (10)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Northern Illinois University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (13)
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Articles (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Journal Articles (6)
-
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Honors Theses (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (1)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 96 of 96
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
A Heterodox Catechism, Paul Campos
Mr. Bork Inquires Into The Origin And Nature Of Permissiveness, Lyle Denniston
Mr. Bork Inquires Into The Origin And Nature Of Permissiveness, Lyle Denniston
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law by Robert H. Bork
The Tempting Of America, Gerard V. Bradley
The Tempting Of America, Gerard V. Bradley
Journal Articles
THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA by Robert Bork. New York: The Free Press/Macmillan, 1990. Hdbd: pp. xiv-432.
In the concluding third of The Tempting of America Robert Bork recounts his unsuccessful fight to gain Senate confirmation to the Supreme Court.
Bork relates his war story to the rest of the book. In the first two-thirds of Tempting, he takes us on a grand tour of the Constitution's career, starting in the courts with Chief Justice John Marshall, on through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and New Deal eras. He finishes with a detailed examination of the Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts. …
Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Inaction, And Civil Rights, Daniel A. Farber
Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Inaction, And Civil Rights, Daniel A. Farber
Michigan Law Review
This month the Supreme Court will hear reargument in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union on the question of whether section 1981 prohibits discrimination by private parties. Professor Farber identifies three issues which lie at the heart of Patterson: Must statutes be construed to conform to the intent of the drafters? Does legislative inaction provide reliable guidance to interpreters of statutes? And should the nature of the claim at issue - here a claim of civil rights - influence the interpreters? On this last point, Professor Farber argues that public values must be relevant to statutory interpretation and that judges …
Updating Statutory Interpretation, T. Alexander Aleinikoff
Updating Statutory Interpretation, T. Alexander Aleinikoff
Michigan Law Review
This month the Supreme Court will hear reargument in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union on the question of whether section 1981 prohibits discrimination by private parties. Professor Aleinikoff examines in depth the first issue raised by Professor Farber. Using metaphors of the archeological and the nautical Professor Aleinikoff describes theories of originalism and their application to statutory interpretation. Concluding that there are nonoriginalist (or nonarcheological) elements implicit in these theories, he proceeds to consider how an explicitly nonoriginalist (or nautical) theory of interpretation might work He concludes by commenting on the application of such a theory to Patterson.
Rationalism In Constitutional Law, Robert F. Nagel