Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (103)
- Courts (60)
- Fourteenth Amendment (53)
- Criminal Procedure (41)
- State and Local Government Law (38)
-
- Jurisprudence (29)
- Judges (24)
- Criminal Law (20)
- Civil Procedure (16)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Jurisdiction (13)
- Civil Law (11)
- First Amendment (10)
- Fourth Amendment (10)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (10)
- Legal History (10)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (8)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Evidence (7)
- Human Rights Law (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (63)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (30)
- Cleveland State University (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
- Roger Williams University (7)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Arcadia University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Southeastern University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (36)
- Touro Law Review (28)
- Articles (23)
- Publications (10)
- Cleveland State Law Review (7)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Emory Law Journal (1)
- Et Cetera (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 154 of 154
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Compulsory Construction Of New Lines Of Railroad, Kenneth F. Burgess
Compulsory Construction Of New Lines Of Railroad, Kenneth F. Burgess
Michigan Law Review
In the half century of public regulation of railroads in the United States, regulatory legislation has dealt primarily with functions incident to the operation of existing enterprises. The basic concept has been that railroad corporations as common carriers have voluntarily assumed obligations to the public which the public has a right to require to be performed.
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Michigan Law Review
For those who love precision and definiteness the question of the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to social and economic problems remains an irritating enigma. The judicial construction of due process of law and the equal protection of the law has from the first discouraged systematic analysis and defied synthesis. More than one writer has emerged from the study of the problem with a neat and compact set of fundamental principles, only to have the Supreme Court discourteously ignore them in its next case. But paradoxical as it may seem, those who long for a wise and forward-looking solution of …
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Michigan Law Review
The Basis of Relief from Penalties and Forfeitures - The equitable principle of relief from penalties and forfeitures is so far elementary as almost to defy analysis. Many, perhaps most, of the judicial explanations of the principle have based it upon interpretation or construction, appealing to the doctrine that equity regards intent rather than form. Yet a logical application of this doctrine would lead to results very different from those which have actually been arrived at in the decisions. Thus, a stipulation in a mortgage that the mortgagor waives his equity of redemption can hardly be interpreted as meaning that …
Due Process Of Law In Procedure, Edson R. Sunderland
Due Process Of Law In Procedure, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
There are two classes of cases which may arise under the "due process" provisions of the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution, so far as rules of procedure are concerned. One embraces cases of new remedial processes which may be criticized as too radical. The other consists of cases of old processes which may be criticized as obsolete and out of harmony with prevailing conceptions of justice. Due process may thus be said to fill the wide space between those innovations which carry us so far away from established methods as to remove the safeguards which are …