Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (145)
- Courts (108)
- Judges (95)
- State and Local Government Law (74)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (63)
-
- Law and Society (59)
- Jurisprudence (51)
- First Amendment (45)
- Law and Politics (43)
- Legislation (38)
- Law and Race (36)
- Legal History (36)
- Law and Gender (28)
- Criminal Law (27)
- Fourteenth Amendment (24)
- Litigation (24)
- Legal Education (23)
- Criminal Procedure (22)
- Legal Profession (22)
- Legal Remedies (21)
- Rule of Law (20)
- President/Executive Department (18)
- Administrative Law (17)
- Civil Procedure (17)
- Human Rights Law (17)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (16)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (15)
- Civil Law (14)
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (35)
- William & Mary Law School (26)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (22)
- Notre Dame Law School (18)
- Seattle University School of Law (18)
-
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (16)
- Brooklyn Law School (12)
- St. Mary's University (12)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11)
- Cleveland State University (10)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Emory University School of Law (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- St. John's University School of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Duke Law (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- Washington University in St. Louis (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Florida International University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (58)
- United States Supreme Court (23)
- First Amendment (19)
- Supreme Court of the United States (19)
- Constitutional law (17)
-
- Constitution (14)
- Abortion (13)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- SCOTUS (11)
- Courts (10)
- Ginsburg (10)
- Supreme court (10)
- Damages (9)
- Qualified Immunity (9)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg (9)
- Bivens (8)
- Federal Officers (8)
- Judges (8)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Justice (8)
- Politics (8)
- RBG (8)
- Racial classifications (8)
- U.S. Supreme Court (8)
- Court (7)
- Discrimination (7)
- Equal protection (7)
- First Amendment; Freedom of Speech; Free speech; Constitutional Law; John Roberts; Roberts Court; Free Expression; Freedom of Expression; First Freedom; Supreme Court jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional Principles (7)
- Judiciary (7)
- Justice Ginsburg (7)
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (34)
- Seattle University Law Review (18)
- Arkansas Law Review (16)
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Touro Law Review (13)
-
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Supreme Court Preview (11)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (9)
- Brooklyn Law Review (8)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Notre Dame Law Review (8)
- Court Briefs (7)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Articles (6)
- Cleveland State Law Review (6)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (6)
- Scholarly Articles (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Publications (5)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (4)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (4)
- FIU Law Review (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 343 of 343
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
The Lost Promise Of Progressive Formalism, Andrea Scoseria Katz
The Lost Promise Of Progressive Formalism, Andrea Scoseria Katz
Scholarship@WashULaw
Today, any number of troubling government pathologies—a lawless presidency, a bloated and unaccountable administrative state, the growth of an activist bench—are associated with the emergence of a judicial philosophy that disregards the “plain meaning” of the Constitution for a loose, unprincipled “living constitutionalism.” Many trace its origins to the Progressive Era
(1890–1920), a time when Americans turned en masse to government as the solution to emerging problems of economic modernity—financial panics, industrial concentration, worsening workplace conditions, and skyrocketing unemployment and inequality—and, the argument goes, concocted a flexible, new constitutional philosophy to allow the federal government to take on vast, new …
Designing Supreme Court Term Limits, Kyle Rozema, Adam Chilton, Daniel Epps, Maya Sen
Designing Supreme Court Term Limits, Kyle Rozema, Adam Chilton, Daniel Epps, Maya Sen
Scholarship@WashULaw
Since the Founding, Supreme Court justices have enjoyed life tenure. This helps insulate the justices from political pressures, but it also results in unpredictable deaths and strategic retirements determining the timing of Court vacancies. In order to regularize the appointment process, a number of academics and policymakers have put forward detailed term limits proposals. However, many of these proposals have been silent on many key design decisions and there has been almost no empirical work assessing the impact that term limits would have on the composition of the Supreme Court.
The Future Of Supreme Court Reform, Daniel Epps, Ganesh Sitaraman
The Future Of Supreme Court Reform, Daniel Epps, Ganesh Sitaraman
Scholarship@WashULaw
For a brief moment in the fall of 2020, structural reform of the Supreme Court seemed like a tangible possibility. After the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September, some prominent Democratic politicians and liberal commentators warmed to the idea of expanding the Court to respond to Republicans’ rush to confirm a nominee before the election, despite their refusal four years prior to confirm Judge Merrick Garland on the ground that it was an election year. Though Democratic candidate Joe Biden won the Presidency in November, Democrats lost seats in the House and have a majority in the Senate …
Supreme Court Reform And American Democracy, Daniel Epps, Ganesh Sitaraman
Supreme Court Reform And American Democracy, Daniel Epps, Ganesh Sitaraman
Scholarship@WashULaw
In "How to Save the Supreme Court," we identified the legitimacy challenge facing the Court, traced it to a set of structural flaws, and proposed novel reforms. Little more than a year later, the conversation around Supreme Court reform has only grown louder and more urgent. In this Essay, we continue that conversation by engaging with critics of our approach. The current crisis of the Supreme Court is, we argue, inextricable from the question of the Supreme Court’s proper role in our democracy. For those interested in reform, there are three distinct strategies for ensuring the Supreme Court maintains its …
John Marshall Harlan And Constitutional Adjudication: An Anniversary Rehearing, H. Jefferson Powell
John Marshall Harlan And Constitutional Adjudication: An Anniversary Rehearing, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Seeking Economic Justice In The Face Of Enduring Racism, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Seeking Economic Justice In The Face Of Enduring Racism, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Justice Ginsburg, Civil Procedure Professor And Champion Of Judicial Federalism, Rodger D. Citron
Justice Ginsburg, Civil Procedure Professor And Champion Of Judicial Federalism, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Why A Federal Wealth Tax Is Constitutional, Ari Glogower, David Gamage, Kitty Richards
Why A Federal Wealth Tax Is Constitutional, Ari Glogower, David Gamage, Kitty Richards
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The 2020 Democratic presidential primaries brought national attention to a new direction for the tax system: a federal wealth tax for the wealthiest taxpayers. During their campaigns, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) both introduced proposals to tax the wealth of multimillionaires and billionaires, and to use the revenue for public investments, including in health care and education. These reforms generated broad public support—even among many Republicans—and broadened the conversation over the future of progressive tax reform.
A well-designed, high-end wealth tax can level the playing field in an unequal society and promote shared economic prosperity.
Critics have …
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
Rabbi Norman Lamm’s 1956 article, “The Fifth Amendment and Its Equivalent in the Halakha,” provides important lessons for scholarship in both Jewish and American law. Sixty-five years after it was published, the article remains, in many ways, a model for interdisciplinary and comparative study of Jewish law, drawing upon sources in the Jewish legal tradition, American legal history, and modern psychology. In so doing, the article proves faithful to each discipline on its own terms, producing insights that illuminate all three disciplines while respecting the internal logic within each one. In addition to many other distinctions, since its initial publication, …
Offensive Mark Owners Have An Enforcement Problem, Yvette Joy Liebesman
Offensive Mark Owners Have An Enforcement Problem, Yvette Joy Liebesman
All Faculty Scholarship
In Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act 2(a) bars for "immoral" or "scandalous" marks are facially unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and thus violate a trademark owner’s First Amendment rights. Brunetti, as well as its predecessor, Matal v. Tam, focused entirely on how the government might generate viewpoint discrimination at the point of trademark registration. The Court did not consider whether enforcement of trademarks—via courts of law, Customs and Border Protection, or the International Trade Commission—is government speech, and thus exempt from First Amendment free speech scrutiny. Yet the Court’s seminal holding of Shelley v. Kraemer illustrates …