Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (35)
- Courts (17)
- Judges (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Criminal Law (11)
-
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Legal History (11)
- First Amendment (10)
- Legal Writing and Research (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Law and Race (6)
- Property Law and Real Estate (6)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (47)
- William & Mary Law School (15)
- Notre Dame Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- New York Law School (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (38)
- Congress (7)
- Federalism (7)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- Judicial review (5)
-
- Supreme Court (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Confessions (4)
- Equal Protection Clause (4)
- Miranda v. Arizona (4)
- Racial discrimination (4)
- Assisted suicide (3)
- Custodial interrogations (3)
- Equal protection (3)
- Equality (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- History (3)
- Physician-assisted suicide (3)
- Police (3)
- Public policy (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Totality of circumstances (3)
- Abortion (2)
- Antiquities (2)
- Arbitral awards (2)
- Arbitrators (2)
- Architecture (2)
- Art (2)
- Bias (2)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (23)
- Articles (13)
- Supreme Court Preview (10)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal Articles (4)
-
- Book Chapters (3)
- Other Publications (3)
- Publications (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Court Briefs (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Reviews (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- International Bulletin of Political Psychology (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 96 of 96
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Arbitration And Judicial Review, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Arbitration And Judicial Review, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Other Publications
A quarter century ago, in a presentation at the Academy's annual meeting, I used the phrase "contract reader" to characterize the role an arbitrator plays in construing a collective bargaining agreement. That two-word phrase may be the only thing I ever said before this body that has been remembered. Unfortunately, it is almost invariably misunderstood. Time and again members have reproached me: "What's the big deal about contract reading, anyway? Isn't it just the same as contract interpretation?" Or, more substantively scathing: "Do you really think, Ted, that all you have to do to interpret a labor agreement is to …
Political Questions, Judicial Questions, And The Problem Of Washington V. Glucksberg, Carl E. Schneider
Political Questions, Judicial Questions, And The Problem Of Washington V. Glucksberg, Carl E. Schneider
Other Publications
Over a century and a half ago, Alexis de Tocqueville famously said, "Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question." Physician-assisted suicide superbly illustrates Tocqueville's acute observation. For a number of years, assisted suicide was the prototype of a (nonpartisan) political question. Interest groups brought it to public attention. Public discussion of it flourished. Legislatures debated it. Citizens in several states decided in referenda whether to make it legal. Almost suddenly, however, this classic political process was transformed into a judicial one by the startling and strongly stated …
The Influence Of Amicus Curiae Briefs On The Supreme Court, Joseph D. Kearney, Thomas W. Merrill
The Influence Of Amicus Curiae Briefs On The Supreme Court, Joseph D. Kearney, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
The last century has seen little change in the conduct of litigation before the United States Supreme Court. The Court's familiar procedures – the October Term, the opening-answering-reply brief format for the parties, oral argument before a nine-member Court – remain essentially as before. The few changes that have occurred, such as shortening the time for oral argument, have not been dramatic.
The Article is organized as follows. Part I provides an overview of amicus curiae activity in the Supreme Court over the last fifty years, tracking the increase in amicus filings and in the Court's citation and quotation of …
Francis Bacon Takes On The Ghouls: The "First Principles" Of Religious Freedom, Richard W. Garnett
Francis Bacon Takes On The Ghouls: The "First Principles" Of Religious Freedom, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
John Witte, Jr.
Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment:
Essential Rights and Liberties
Westview Press 2000
From the Review
This is a great time for students of the First Amendment's Religion Clauses and of what Professor John Witte calls the American "experiment" with religious freedom. We've been blessed these past few years with an in-print seminar - an upper-division offering, team-taught by faculty heavyweights - on this experiment, its products and prospects, and the values that have shaped it. Our teachers and texts have included, to name just a few, Professor Steven Smith's Foreordained Failure: The Constitutional Quest for a …
Review Of Leaving The Bench: Supreme Court Justices At The End, By D. N. Atkinson, Richard D. Friedman
Review Of Leaving The Bench: Supreme Court Justices At The End, By D. N. Atkinson, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
David Atkinson points out an interesting anomaly near the beginning of his book, Leaving the Bench: scholars have spent an enormous amount of energy studying entrance to the Supreme Court-how justices are chosen-but much less studying exit. It is indeed an important issue. Do justices stay too long (or perhaps leave too early)? What mechanisms are in place to induce them to leave the Court when the time has come, and passed? Are further mechanisms needed?
Cardozo The [Small R] Realist, Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo The [Small R] Realist, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
In Part I of this Review, I will discuss aspects of Cardozo's life and character. In Part II, I will discuss Cardozo's jurisprudential theory as revealed in his lectures and essays. In Part IlI, I will suggest how we gain a better perspective on his judicial opinions by understanding not only that theory but also the man and his life.