Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (77)
- Courts (73)
- State and Local Government Law (72)
- Jurisprudence (41)
- Judges (40)
-
- Criminal Procedure (37)
- Criminal Law (32)
- Fourteenth Amendment (30)
- Civil Procedure (27)
- Civil Law (25)
- First Amendment (11)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (11)
- Fourth Amendment (7)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Social Welfare Law (6)
- Evidence (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Bankruptcy Law (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Legal Biography (3)
- Disability Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (70)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- New York Law School (3)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Federal (60)
- State (60)
- New York (59)
- 1990) (57)
- Constitution (56)
-
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (41)
- Court of Appeals (32)
- § 1 (26)
- Supreme Court (25)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. XIV (22)
- § 6 (22)
- Defendant (21)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Due process (17)
- Appellate Division (16)
- Equal protection (16)
- Violated (15)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. V (14)
- Constitutional (13)
- Statute (13)
- § 11 (13)
- United States (12)
- Court (11)
- Police (9)
- Second Department (9)
- Violation (9)
- Congress (8)
- Judge (7)
- Legislature (7)
- Plaintiffs (7)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (70)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Articles (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
-
- American Indian Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Endowed/named Lectures and Keynote Addresses (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Reviews (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 107 of 107
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Qualifications Of Governor And Lieutenant-Governor
Qualifications Of Governor And Lieutenant-Governor
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Threshold Test For Validity: The Supreme Court Narrows The Act Of State Doctrine, Steven R. Swanson
A Threshold Test For Validity: The Supreme Court Narrows The Act Of State Doctrine, Steven R. Swanson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court's recent decisions involving the act of state doctrine. This doctrine, which is based upon notions of international comity, prevents the courts of one state from adjudicating the acts of a foreign state that occur within the foreign state's territory. This respect for foreign tribunals reduces friction between states and promotes more cooperative interaction in the international arena.
The Article first defines comity and explains its importance in international litigation. Professor Swanson then outlines the diminishing role of comity as a basis for the act of state doctrine. In early opinions, United States courts refused …
Rotten To The "Core": An Essay On Juries, Jurisdiction And Granfinanciera, G. Ray Warner
Rotten To The "Core": An Essay On Juries, Jurisdiction And Granfinanciera, G. Ray Warner
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
Like a worm in an apple, the recent Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg decision has eaten away the article III heart of the current bankruptcy jurisdictional scheme while leaving nothing more than a seventh amendment blemish on the surface.
Granfinanciera ostensibly involves only the question whether Congress may, consistent with the seventh amendment jury trial guarantee, bar trial by jury in a fraudulent conveyance action brought in the bankruptcy court. The Court, however, converts the issue into an article III delegation question by equating Congress' power to override the seventh amendment with its power to delegate matters to non-article III …
From Widmar To Mergens: The Winding Road Of First Amendment Analysis, Rosemary C. Salomone
From Widmar To Mergens: The Winding Road Of First Amendment Analysis, Rosemary C. Salomone
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In 1981, the Supreme Court decided Widmar v. Vincent, holding that a state university that created a "limited open forum" by opening its facilities to student organizations must grant equal access to religiously affiliated groups. The university's failure to do so constituted content-based discrimination that violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court rejected the university's argument that its policy to disallow religious meetings on campus was implemented to avoid contravening establishment clause principles. The Court's opinion was inconclusive as to whether the Widmar rationale would apply to secondary schools.
During the same period, Congress …
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Model For How A Classic Conservative Court Would Enforce The Bill Of Rights, Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Absolute Priority And New Value, James J. White
Absolute Priority And New Value, James J. White
Articles
This paper is based on a lecture given on December 6, 1990 ast the Second Annual Robert E. Krinock Lecture. The absolute priority rule is a specific application of the broader doctrine that reorganization plans must be "fair and equitable." Both have their origins in the railroad reorganization cases of the early 20th century. The general doctrine is now codified in section 1129(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code and the rule is codified in subsection 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) which provides that the debtor must pay a nonconsenting class of unsecured creditors in full or "the holder of any claim or interest that is …
Waiver Of Rights In The Interrogation Room: The Court's Dilemma, William T. Pizzi
Waiver Of Rights In The Interrogation Room: The Court's Dilemma, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Prisoners' Rights, Timothy Zick
Halluctinations Of Neutrality In The Oregon Peyote Case, Harry F. Tepker Jr.
Halluctinations Of Neutrality In The Oregon Peyote Case, Harry F. Tepker Jr.
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicially-Suggested Harassment Of Indian Tribes: The Potawatomis Revisit Moe And Colville, Michael Minnis
Judicially-Suggested Harassment Of Indian Tribes: The Potawatomis Revisit Moe And Colville, Michael Minnis
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The New York Law School Centennial Conference In Honor Of Justice John Marshall Harlan, James F. Simon
Foreword: The New York Law School Centennial Conference In Honor Of Justice John Marshall Harlan, James F. Simon
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Putting The Dormancy Doctrine Out Of Its Misery, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Justice Antonin Scalia has put on the academic table the question of whether the doctrine of the dormant commerce clause should be abandoned. That is a significant contribution, for this is an issue that should be debated thoroughly. But Justice Scalia's campaign against the doctrine has been notably ambivalent. On the one hand, he argues that the doctrine lacks justification in constitutional text, history, and theory.1 On the other hand, assertedly feeling the pressure of stare decisis,2 he has gone along with, and even led, applications of the doctrine, although within narrow limits.3 In this essay, I argue that Justice …
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Review Of Cardozo: A Study In Reputation, By R. Posner, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
Judge Richard Posner has written a genial book about one of our greatest judicial icons, Benjamin N. Cardozo.1 He seeks not only to assess the merits of Cardozo's writings, both on and off the bench, but also to measure, and determine the causes of, Cardozo's reputation. The book is an outgrowth of a lecture series,2 and it reveals its origins in at least two ways. First, the book attempts to reach a mixed audience, composed of both lawyers and laypeople, and in this aspect it is very successful. Nonlawyers, I believe, will have little difficulty following Judge Posner's essential arguments, …
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Structural Free Exercise, Mary Ann Glendon, Raul F. Yanes
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we analyze the development of case law interpreting the religious freedom language of the First Amendment from the 1940s to the eve of the rights revolution as a casualty of the piecemeal approach to incorporation, compounded by a series of judicial lapses and oversights. Part II deals with the fate of the Religion Clause in the era of the rights revolution, when the free exercise and establishment provisions were deployed in the service of a constitutional agenda to which they were, in themselves, largely peripheral. The current period of doctrinal change is the subject …