Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (191)
- Courts (80)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (61)
- First Amendment (50)
- Judges (46)
-
- Criminal Law (31)
- Criminal Procedure (27)
- Legal History (23)
- Commercial Law (21)
- Election Law (20)
- Civil Procedure (15)
- Labor and Employment Law (14)
- Property Law and Real Estate (14)
- Fourth Amendment (13)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Education Law (11)
- Environmental Law (11)
- Law and Politics (11)
- President/Executive Department (11)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (11)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Legal Biography (10)
- Political Science (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- American Politics (9)
- Religion Law (9)
- Second Amendment (8)
- Business (7)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (375)
- Devins works (44)
- United States. Supreme Court (36)
- Constitutional Law (31)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (29)
-
- Civil Rights (26)
- Supreme Court Justices (23)
- Commercial Law (22)
- Federalism (22)
- Criminal Law (19)
- Criminal Procedure (18)
- Judges (18)
- Judicial Review (17)
- Adler works (16)
- Freedom of Speech (16)
- Judicial Process (16)
- Abortion (15)
- Separation of Powers (14)
- Bruhl works (13)
- Constitutional Interpretation (12)
- Church and State (11)
- Constitutional law (11)
- Election Law (11)
- John Marshall (10)
- Searches and Seizures (10)
- Statutory interpretation (10)
- Affirmative Action (9)
- Book Reviews (9)
- Due Process of Law (9)
- Judicial Power (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 481 - 510 of 663
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Peaches, Speech, And Clarence Thomas: Yes, California, There Is A Justice Who Understands The Ramifications Of Controlling Commercial Speech, Jennifer R. Franklin
Peaches, Speech, And Clarence Thomas: Yes, California, There Is A Justice Who Understands The Ramifications Of Controlling Commercial Speech, Jennifer R. Franklin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Ferguson V. City Of Charleston, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Ferguson V. City Of Charleston, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Looking Ahead: Upcoming Issues In The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Looking Ahead: Upcoming Issues In The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court's 1998-1999 Term: Fourth Amendment Decisions, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Supreme Court's 1998-1999 Term: Fourth Amendment Decisions, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
How Constitutional Law Casebooks Perpetuate The Myth Of Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
How Constitutional Law Casebooks Perpetuate The Myth Of Judicial Supremacy, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Reanimator: Mark Tushnet And The Second Coming Of The Imperial Presidency, Neal Devins
Reanimator: Mark Tushnet And The Second Coming Of The Imperial Presidency, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law -- Due Process Clause -- Third Circuit Holds That $50 Million Punitive Damages Award In Context Of A $48 Million Compensatory Award Is Unconstitutionally Excessive -- Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. V. Ebi Medical Systems, Inc., 181 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 1999)., A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
In 1996, the Supreme Court, in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, struck down a punitive damages award on the ground that it was "grossly excessive" in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Since BMW, many courts have faced the challenge of applying its principles to determine whether punitive damages awards surpass the constitutional limit. Last June, in Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. v. EBI Medical Systems, Inc., the Third Circuit faced this difficulty when it considered whether a $50 million punitive damages award, granted in conjunction with a $48 million compensatory damages award, was …
Negotiated Development Denial Meets People's Court: Del Monte Dunes Brings New Wildcards To Exactions Law, Jonathan M. Davidson, Ronald H. Rosenberg, Michael C. Spata
Negotiated Development Denial Meets People's Court: Del Monte Dunes Brings New Wildcards To Exactions Law, Jonathan M. Davidson, Ronald H. Rosenberg, Michael C. Spata
Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court Answered "YES" to the $1.45 million over exaction question for 1999. In City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey Ltd., a unanimous court extended the scope of compensatory takings review beyond land dedication conditions into the realm of regulatory denial. Justice Kennedy's opinion vitalized the "legitimate state interests" test from Agins v. City of Tiburon to sustain an inverse condemnation conclusion and damage award to the frustrated developer. A majority of the court also concurred that the trial court may delegate this takings conclusion to the jury under federal civil rights law. The …
Section 10: Justice Blackmun, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 10: Justice Blackmun, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: The Court And The 2000 Election, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: The Court And The 2000 Election, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Upcoming Issues Before The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Upcoming Issues Before The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Mitchell V. Helms, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Mitchell V. Helms, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 11: Toni House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 11: Toni House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Business And Commerce, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Business And Commerce, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights Act Of 1991 -- Employer Liability For Punitive Damages In Title Vii Claims, Angela M. Banks
Civil Rights Act Of 1991 -- Employer Liability For Punitive Damages In Title Vii Claims, Angela M. Banks
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Justice Powell, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Justice Powell, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: The Court And The Public, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: The Court And The Public, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Chicago V. Morales, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Chicago V. Morales, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Upcoming Issues In The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Upcoming Issues In The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Business, Commerce, And Property, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Business, Commerce, And Property, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.