Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (347)
- Judges (344)
- State and Local Government Law (322)
- Constitutional Law (69)
- Law and Society (37)
-
- Criminal Law (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (33)
- Criminal Procedure (31)
- Law and Politics (25)
- Health Law and Policy (21)
- Legal History (21)
- Civil Procedure (19)
- First Amendment (19)
- Sexuality and the Law (17)
- Family Law (15)
- Legal Profession (15)
- Civil Law (13)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Tax Law (13)
- Housing Law (12)
- Law and Gender (12)
- Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Human Rights Law (10)
- Law and Race (10)
- Business Organizations Law (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (9)
- Education Law (8)
- Election Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (50)
- Constitution (9)
- Roe v. Wade (9)
- Brown v. Board of Education (8)
- Constitutional law (8)
-
- Virginia (8)
- Employment Division v. Smith (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- Politics (6)
- Death (5)
- Education (5)
- History (5)
- Justices (5)
- Popular constitutionalism (5)
- Judicial (4)
- Legal history (4)
- Lemon v. Kurtzman (4)
- Lochner (4)
- Race (4)
- Regulation (4)
- United States (4)
- Bork (3)
- Civil Rights Act (3)
- Courts (3)
- Dred Scott (3)
- Federal (3)
- Foreword (3)
- Judge (3)
- Judges (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 460 of 460
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
University Of Richmond Law Review Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Review Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
University of Richmond Law Review
The freedom of a court, state or federal, to define the limits of ad- herence to precedent has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court in both civil' and criminal cases. Accordingly, any decision can be made to apply to future cases or relate back to all past cases. In no other area of the law is such a decision more important than in the field of criminal procedure where the freedom of a convicted man can rest upon a decision to apply a new "rule" retroactively or prospectively. It is not surprising, therefore, that the majority of retroactivity cases involve …
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.
A Nation Without A Supreme Court, Jose M. Cabanillas
A Nation Without A Supreme Court, Jose M. Cabanillas
University of Richmond Law Review
The Constitution of the Confederate States of America, unanimously adopted on March 11, 1861, by the as- sembled delegates of the original seceding states and on June 19, 1861, by the state of Virginia, was for all practical purposes a copy of the Constitution of the United States. Its judicial provisions begin in Article III with the familiar-sounding phrase "The judicial powers of the Confederate States shall be vested in one supreme court and. . . ." There is no reason to believe that this phraseology was a blind copy of the older document, and that it was not the …
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
Important amendments to its Rules, effective April 1, 1961, were recently adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Perhaps the change of most interest to trial lawyers was the revision of Rule 3:23 relating to D'epositions and Discovery in Actions at Law.
University Of Richmond Law Notes, J. Westwood Smithers
University Of Richmond Law Notes, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreward, William T. Muse
Foreward, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
The reception accorded the first number of the University of Richmond Law Notes, published last spring, has been most gratifying. It has encouraged the Faculty to prepare this second number, which also is being distributed to all alumni of the Law School through the courtesy of the University of Richmond Law School Association. There has been a modest volume of requests for copies of the first issue from non-alumni members of the bar and from many law libraries.
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University Of Richmond Law Notes Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreward, William T. Muse
Foreward, William T. Muse
University of Richmond Law Review
This first issue of the University of Richmond Law Notes inaugurates a service by the Faculty of the Law School which we hope will be of some value to the lawyers of Virginia. If the bar thinks the undertaking worth- while it will become a permanent publication,-perhaps enlarged in scope and volume.