Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (187)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- University of Michigan Law School (37)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- Notre Dame Law School (8)
-
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (7)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Emory University School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Southern Methodist University (3)
- University of Dayton (3)
- Wayne State University (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Liberty University (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Establishment Clause (27)
- First Amendment (26)
- Religion (24)
- United States Supreme Court (21)
- Supreme Court (18)
-
- Law (17)
- Free Exercise Clause (14)
- Free exercise (12)
- Discrimination (11)
- Religious freedom (11)
- Constitutional law (9)
- Establishment clause (9)
- Freedom of religion (9)
- Race (9)
- Religious Freedom Restoration Act (9)
- Church and state (8)
- Separation of church and state (8)
- Constitution (7)
- Copyright (7)
- Religious liberty (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Everson v. Board of Education (6)
- Investment (6)
- Lemon test (6)
- City of Boerne v. Flores (5)
- Corporation (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Federalism (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (187)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (31)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (7)
- Publications (6)
-
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Court Briefs (3)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Supreme Court Preview (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- American Indian Law Review (2)
- Articles (2)
- Brooklyn Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Helm's School of Government Conference - 2021-2024 (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Marquette Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review Online (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 471 of 471
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court, Compulsory Education, And The First Amendment's Religion Clauses, Philip B. Kurland
The Supreme Court, Compulsory Education, And The First Amendment's Religion Clauses, Philip B. Kurland
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Walz Decision: More On The Religion Clauses Of The First Amendment, Paul G. Kauper
The Walz Decision: More On The Religion Clauses Of The First Amendment, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
The principal thrust of this Article is to determine the contribution made by the Walz decision to the body of ideas that has been developed by the Court in its application of the interdependent free exercise and establishment limitations of the first amendment, to point up any distinctively new emphases, and to suggest the implications of these new ideas and emphases for important cases coming before the Court at its 1970-1971 term.
Conscientious Objector - Welsh V. United States, Deborah Mailman
Conscientious Objector - Welsh V. United States, Deborah Mailman
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schoolhouse Religion And The Supreme Court: A Report On Attitudes Of Teachers And Principals And On School Practices In Wisconsin And Ohio, Donald R. Reich
Schoolhouse Religion And The Supreme Court: A Report On Attitudes Of Teachers And Principals And On School Practices In Wisconsin And Ohio, Donald R. Reich
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court: Religious Liberty And Church-State Relations, Paul G. Kauper
The Warren Court: Religious Liberty And Church-State Relations, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the holdings of the Warren Court under these two clauses in an attempt to assess their significance by reference both to earlier interpretations and to the direction they may give to future development.
Constitutional Law-Church And State-Shared Time: Indirect Aid To Parochial Schools, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law-Church And State-Shared Time: Indirect Aid To Parochial Schools, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
For over forty years, public schools have been participating in shared time programs pursuant to which non-public school children attend public schools for instruction in one or more subjects during the regular school day. Since ninety per cent of the pupils in nonpublic elementary and secondary schools are in Roman Catholic schools, shared time-or, as it is also known, dual enrollment raises questions of an establishment of religion in contravention of the provisions of the first amendment to the Constitution. To date, no court has faced this constitutional issue and only three state courts have ruled upon the validity of …
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Despite serious illness, plaintiff requested, in accordance with her religious beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness, that blood transfusions not be administered to her. Upon the request of her physician and several assistant state's attorneys, a court-appointed guardian was authorized to consent to a blood transfusion for the plaintiff, and a transfusion was administered. On appeal of the court's action to the Supreme Court of Illinois, held, order reversed. The authorization of a blood transfusion for an adult Jehovah's Witness who has only adult children is an unconstitutional interference with the patient's right to the free exercise of her religion.
Boles: The Bible, Religion And The Public Schools, Arthur E. Sutherland
Boles: The Bible, Religion And The Public Schools, Arthur E. Sutherland
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Bible, Religion and the Public Schools (3d ed) by Donald E. Boles
Predicting Court Cases Quantitatively, Stuart Nagel
Predicting Court Cases Quantitatively, Stuart Nagel
Michigan Law Review
This article illustrates and systematically compares three methods for quantitatively predicting case outcomes. The three methods are correlation, regression, and discriminant analysis, all of which involve standard social science research techniques. Two prior articles have generated requests for a study dealing with the problems involved in handling a larger number of cases and predictive variables. The present article is also designed to provide such a study. It does not presuppose that the reader has read the earlier articles, although such a reading might help to clarify further some of the points made here. The cases used to illustrate the methods …
Chief Justice Waite And The "Twin Relic": Reynolds V. United States, C. Peter Magrath
Chief Justice Waite And The "Twin Relic": Reynolds V. United States, C. Peter Magrath
Vanderbilt Law Review
In the landmark case of Reynolds v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that a general law prohibiting polygamy did not abridge the religious freedom of members of the Mormon faith guaranteed by the first amendment. The author here explores the background of Chief Justice Waite's opinion in Reynolds v. United States: the tenets and development of the Mormon faith in the United States, the character of the Waite Court, and the sources and development of Chief Justice Waite's opinion in the case.
Giannella: Religion And The Public Order, Rev. Robert F. Drinan S. J.
Giannella: Religion And The Public Order, Rev. Robert F. Drinan S. J.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Religion and the Public Order. An Annual Review of Church and State and of Religion, Law and Society, The Institute of Church and State, Villanova University School of Law. Edited by Donald A. Giannella.
Book Reviews, Ronan E. Degnan, Jerold Israel, Robert F. Drinan S.J.
Book Reviews, Ronan E. Degnan, Jerold Israel, Robert F. Drinan S.J.
Vanderbilt Law Review
Cases and Materials on Debtor and Creditor
By Vern Countryman
Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1964. Pp. lxiii, 841. $12.50.
reviewer: Ronan E. Degnan
================================
The Supreme Court on Trial
By Charles S. Hyneman
New York: Atherton Press, 1963. Pp. IX, 308. $6.50.
reviewer: Jerold Israel
=================================
Religion and American Constitutions (1963 Rosenthal Lectures)
By Wilbur G. Katz
Northwestern University Press 1964. Pp. 114. $3.50.
reviewer: Rev. Robert F. Drinan, S.J.
The Establishment Clause And The Ecumenical Movement, Robert C. Casad
The Establishment Clause And The Ecumenical Movement, Robert C. Casad
Michigan Law Review
In recent years the Roman Catholic Church has begun to give tentative official support to the view that eventual reconciliation with the Protestants is feasible and desirable. The acceptance of the ecumenical ideal by the Roman Catholic Church removes virtually all doubt that in the ecumenical movement organized Christianity is facing an upheaval of major importance, comparable perhaps to the Reformation. It is not likely to lose force after a few years, as so many minor religious movements do. It is definitely under way, gaining momentum year by year. It is bound to have far-reaching effects and give rise to …
Prayer, Public Schools And The Supreme Court, Paul G. Kauper
Prayer, Public Schools And The Supreme Court, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
A more complete understanding of the case, while doing much to temper the initial outburst of disapproval, did not by any means dispel all criticism of the decision or allay all the apprehensions aroused by it. Believing that the Supreme Court's opinion was premised on a fundamentally erroneous interpretation of the establishment clause of the first amendment, Bishop James A. Pike headed a movement to amend the Constitution so as to restore what he regarded as the true and intended meaning of its pertinent language. In the meantime, the Supreme Court has agreed to review and has heard argument on …
The EngelCase From A Swiss Perspective, F. William O'Brien
The EngelCase From A Swiss Perspective, F. William O'Brien
Michigan Law Review
On June 25, 1962, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of New York, by using its public school system to encourage recitation of a prayer during classroom hours, had adopted a practice wholly inconsistent with that clause of the first amendment, applicable to the states by virtue of the fourteenth amendment, which prohibits laws respecting an establishment of religion. The opinion of the Court, written by Mr. Justice Black for himself and four other Justices, is interesting in that he rests the Court's decision exclusively upon the establishment clause. In previous decisions, the Court had …
Church And State: Cooperative Separatism, Paul G. Kauper
Church And State: Cooperative Separatism, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
Nothing is better calculated to stimulate argument, arouse controversy, excite the emotions and even produce intense visceral reactions than a discussion of church-state relations. Always a subject of lively interest, it has received added attention and emphasis in recent months. Perhaps at no time in at least the modem era of American history have the questions of the proper relationship between religion and government been more thoroughly publicized and explored, and the issues more widely debated, than during the period beginning with the presidential campaign of 1960.
Constitutional Law- Freedom Of Religion- Tuition Payments To Parochial Schools Violate Fourteenth Amendment, William S. Bach
Constitutional Law- Freedom Of Religion- Tuition Payments To Parochial Schools Violate Fourteenth Amendment, William S. Bach
Michigan Law Review
Because defendant school district did not maintain a high school within the school district, tuition payments were made, as provided by statute, to the high schools attended by pupils residing within the district. The parents of each student selected the high school to be attended. As a result of this program, some tuition payments were made to high schools operated by the Roman Catholic Church. Plaintiff taxpayer sought in a declaratory judgment a determination of the validity of tuition payments made to Catholic high schools under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Vermont. The court of chancery held …
Constitutional Law - Separation Of Church And State - Bible Reading In The Public Schools, Henry B. Pearsall
Constitutional Law - Separation Of Church And State - Bible Reading In The Public Schools, Henry B. Pearsall
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, as parents of children in the public school system, sought to enjoin and have declared unconstitutional the practice of reading aloud to students each day ten verses of the Holy Bible as required by a Pennsylvania statute. The plaintiffs contended that this practice constituted an establishment of religion and a prohibition of the free exercise thereof and was therefore a violation of rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. By a three-judge district court, held, for plaintiffs. The statute violated the United States Constitution because the Bible is essentially a religious book and the …
Church, State, And Freedom: A Review, Paul G. Kauper
Church, State, And Freedom: A Review, Paul G. Kauper
Michigan Law Review
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Everson case declaring that the separation-of-church-and-state limitation derived from the First Amendment was equally applicable to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment opened up new vistas on the church-state problems in this country. Opponents of released time programs were quick to seize the opening thus afforded as evidenced by the litigation in the McCollum and Zorach cases. And even before the Everson case reached it, the Supreme Court, thanks almost entirely to the efforts of Jehovah's Witnesses, had been engaged at length with the task of defining the dimensions of religious freedom as secured …
Release Time And Religious Liberty: A Reply, Leo Pfeffer
Release Time And Religious Liberty: A Reply, Leo Pfeffer
Michigan Law Review
In his generous article-review of this writer's book, Church, State, and Freedom, Paul G. Kauper justified the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Zorach v. Clauson on the basis of its prior decision in Pierce v. Society of Sisters. In the Pierce case, it will be remembered, the Supreme Court invalidated an Oregon statute whose purpose it was to require attendance of all children at public schools. In Zorach v. Clauson, the Court upheld the validity of a New York statute that permitted public schools to release children for one hour weekly to receive religious …