Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (198)
- University of Michigan Law School (47)
- University of Colorado Law School (27)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (20)
- Brooklyn Law School (18)
-
- Fordham Law School (17)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (12)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Roger Williams University (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (8)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- The University of Akron (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (53)
- Supreme Court (36)
- Litigation (34)
- Constitution (20)
- Civil rights (15)
-
- Congress (15)
- Law (13)
- Standing (13)
- Civil procedure (12)
- Discrimination (12)
- Class actions (11)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (11)
- Employment discrimination (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Federal courts (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Rule 23 (9)
- Due process (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Courts (7)
- Education (7)
- Federalism (7)
- Justice (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Separation of powers (7)
- Trials (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Diversity (6)
- ESG (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (198)
- Publications (27)
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- Touro Law Review (18)
- Articles (15)
-
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Northwestern University Law Review (10)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (8)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Scholarly Articles (7)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (5)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (3)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 421 - 450 of 477
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Expert Information And Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy, Samuel R. Gross, Jennifer L. Mnookin
Expert Information And Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy, Samuel R. Gross, Jennifer L. Mnookin
Articles
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which "scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact," and provides that, in that situation, "a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise . . . .' In 2000, following a trio of Supreme Court cases interpreting Rule 702, the Rule was amended to include a third requirement, in addition to the helpfulness of the testimony and the qualifications of the witness: reliability. Under Rule 702 …
Misclassifying Monetary Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
Misclassifying Monetary Restitution, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
Michigan Law Review
In an increasingly common litigation strategy, plaintiffs in Patrickson v. Dole Food Company, laborers in the banana industries of Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala and Panama, brought a classaction suit in Hawaii state court against Dole Food and other defendants. Plaintiffs brought only state law causes of action, alleging that they had been harmed by Dole Food's use of DBCP, a toxic pesticide banned from use in the United States. Dole Food removed the case to federal district court seeking the procedural advantages of a federal forum, as corporate defendants facing alien tort plaintiffs seeking redress for overseas conduct invariably do. …
Product Liability In The United States Supreme Court: A Venture In Memory Of Gary Schwartz., Anita Bernstein
Product Liability In The United States Supreme Court: A Venture In Memory Of Gary Schwartz., Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Bush V. Gore Means For Elections In The 21st Century, Helen Norton
What Bush V. Gore Means For Elections In The 21st Century, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
Finding Gold In The Rainbow Rights Movement, Shayna S. Cook
Finding Gold In The Rainbow Rights Movement, Shayna S. Cook
Michigan Law Review
In her history of the past fifty years of the gay and lesbian civil rights movement, Patricia Cain recounts the litigation successes and failures that contributed to the legal status of gays and lesbians in the Untied States today. Clearly an insider who has marched with the movement every step of the way, Cain provides a comprehensive account of all fronts of the battle in state and federal courts since 1950. But while Rainbow Rights serves as a good primer on the legal challenges and the key themes uniting them, the book reads like an account of a struggle ending …
Constitutional Law -- Due Process Clause -- Third Circuit Holds That $50 Million Punitive Damages Award In Context Of A $48 Million Compensatory Award Is Unconstitutionally Excessive -- Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. V. Ebi Medical Systems, Inc., 181 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 1999)., A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
In 1996, the Supreme Court, in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, struck down a punitive damages award on the ground that it was "grossly excessive" in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Since BMW, many courts have faced the challenge of applying its principles to determine whether punitive damages awards surpass the constitutional limit. Last June, in Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. v. EBI Medical Systems, Inc., the Third Circuit faced this difficulty when it considered whether a $50 million punitive damages award, granted in conjunction with a $48 million compensatory damages award, was …
Pinochet And International Human Rights Litigation, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Pinochet And International Human Rights Litigation, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Michigan Law Review
The British House of Lords recently considered whether Augusto Pinochet was subject to arrest and possible extradition to Spain for alleged acts of torture and other egregious conduct carried out during his reign as Chile's head of state. The Law Lords held that a large majority of the charges against Pinochet were not proper grounds for extradition under British law. They also held, however, that Pinochet could potentially be extradited for alleged acts of torture committed after Britain's 1988 ratifica· tion of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In reaching this latter conclusion, …
Treating Sexual Harassment With Respect, Anita Bernstein
Treating Sexual Harassment With Respect, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Awarding Attorney's Fees To Pro Se Litigants Under Rule 11, Jeremy D. Spector
Awarding Attorney's Fees To Pro Se Litigants Under Rule 11, Jeremy D. Spector
Michigan Law Review
Among the myriad rules and statutes designed to curb litigation abuse, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") is "the most widely used and most controversial of the sanctions rules." The increased use of Rule ll during the last fifteen years and the recent proliferation of fee-shifting provisions in federal statutes4 have led to an onslaught of motions for attorney's fees in the federal district courts. Simultaneously, these courts are seeing an increasing number of pro se litigants appear before them. The confluence of these two trends has produced the seemingly paradoxical result of pro se parties …
Understanding The Establishment Clause: The Perspective Of Constitutional Litigation, Robert A. Sedler
Understanding The Establishment Clause: The Perspective Of Constitutional Litigation, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply, Richard D. Friedman
Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Three years ago, with the publication of his article ''An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem of Peremptories" in this journal, Professor Friedman initiated a debate on the subject that was taken up in 1994 by three prosecutors who offered a rebuttal that was also printed in these pages. Professor Friedman continues the debate.
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
LLM Theses and Essays
Arbitration has long been regarded as a process that combines finality of decision with speed, low expense, and flexibility in solving problems. For these reasons, arbitration is often favored over litigation for dispute resolution. Particularly in international cases, a businessman may avoid litigation in a foreign country for various reasons: he may be unfamiliar with the proceedings; he may be afraid to find a “forum hostile” because of the different legal and cultural background of the judges; and he may wish to avoid the uncertainty concerning the law arising from the contract. Arbitration proceedings have been held constitutional by the …
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the question of how well established a scientific principle must be for it to provide the basis for expert testimony. Even after the passage of the Federal Rules of Evidence, several of the federal circuits, as well as various states, purported to adhere to Frye's "general acceptance" standard. But now, unanimously, briefly, and with no apparent angst, the United States Supreme Court has held in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the Frye rule is incompatible with the Federal Rules.
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein, Harold J. Krent, Ethan G. Shenkman
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein, Harold J. Krent, Ethan G. Shenkman
Michigan Law Review
After briefly summarizing Lujan and addressing Sunstein's critique, we explore the concept of accountability underlying the creation of a single executive in Article II. We then apply our theory of the unitary executive to several examples of broad grants of statutory standing, concluding that Congress can confer standing on private citizens only if it specifically articulates and individuates the interests whose violation gives rise to a cognizable case. Although we agree with Sunstein's view that broad grants of statutory standing do not necessarily trench upon constitutional values, we ultimately side with Justice Scalia in concluding that universal citizen standing, as …
A Tribute To Thurgood Marshall, Peter N. Simon
The Importance Of A Contextual Approach To Libel Law: The Impact Of Immuno Ag. V. Moor-Jankowski And Milkovich V. Lorain Journal Co., Margaret Chan
The Importance Of A Contextual Approach To Libel Law: The Impact Of Immuno Ag. V. Moor-Jankowski And Milkovich V. Lorain Journal Co., Margaret Chan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
What's Standing After Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, "Injuries," And Article Iii, Cass R. Sunstein
What's Standing After Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, "Injuries," And Article Iii, Cass R. Sunstein
Michigan Law Review
In this article, I have two principal goals. The first is to explain why Lujan's invalidation of a congressional grant of standing is a misinterpretation of the Constitution. It is now apparently the law that Article III forbids Congress from granting standing to "citizens" to bring suit. But this view, building on an unfortunate innovation in standing law by Justice William 0. Douglas, is surprisingly novel. It has no support in the text or history of Article III. It is essentially an invention of federal judges, and recent ones at that. Certainly it should not be accepted by judges …
An Asymmetrical Approach To The Problem Of Peremptories?, Richard D. Friedman
An Asymmetrical Approach To The Problem Of Peremptories?, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The Supreme Court's decision in Batson v. Kentucky, and the extension of Batson to parties other than prosecutors, may be expected to put pressure on the institution of peremptory challenges. After a brief review of the history of peremptories, this article contends that peremptories for criminal defendants serve important values of our criminal justice system. It then argues that peremptories for prosecutors are not as important, and that it may no longer be worthwhile to maintain them in light of the administrative complexities inevitable in a system of peremptories consistent with Batson. The article concludes that the asymmetry of allowing …
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gideon V. Wainwright A Quarter-Century Later, Yale Kamisar
Gideon V. Wainwright A Quarter-Century Later, Yale Kamisar
Articles
In a brief working paper sent to all conference participants, Professor Burt Neuborne suggested that we might consider several themes, among them "Gideon Celebrated," "Gideon Fulfilled," and "Gideon Betrayed." I think these are useful headings.
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's Real Property Tax Law: The More Changes That Are Made, The More Things Stay The Same, Ira M. Sockowitz
New York's Real Property Tax Law: The More Changes That Are Made, The More Things Stay The Same, Ira M. Sockowitz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Under Advisement: Attorney Fee Forfeiture And The Supreme Court, Stacy Caplow
Under Advisement: Attorney Fee Forfeiture And The Supreme Court, Stacy Caplow
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Housing Discrimination, Richard F. Bellman ,Esq., Richard Cahn ,Esq.
Housing Discrimination, Richard F. Bellman ,Esq., Richard Cahn ,Esq.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.