Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (224)
- Seattle University School of Law (211)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Brooklyn Law School (36)
- University of Colorado Law School (34)
-
- Penn State Dickinson Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (17)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (17)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (11)
- St. John's University School of Law (11)
- UIC School of Law (11)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- University of Washington School of Law (7)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Liberty University (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (192)
- Congress (97)
- Statutory interpretation (45)
- Discrimination (41)
- Constitution (40)
-
- Supreme Court (33)
- Judicial review (30)
- Law reform (30)
- Federalism (24)
- Race and law (24)
- Separation of powers (23)
- Legislation (22)
- History (19)
- Commerce Clause (18)
- Regulation (18)
- Voting Rights Act (17)
- Law (15)
- Voting (15)
- Constitutionality (14)
- National Labor Relations Act (14)
- Antitrust (13)
- Employees (12)
- Equal Protection Clause (12)
- Interstate commerce (12)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Preemption (12)
- Racial discrimination (12)
- Textualism (12)
- Affirmative action (11)
- African Americans (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (211)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (90)
- Articles (85)
- Publications (33)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (32)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (21)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (19)
- Journal of Law and Policy (15)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- Fordham Law Review (10)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (10)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (9)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (8)
- Northwestern University Law Review (8)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (7)
- St. John's Law Review (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (6)
- Washington Law Review (6)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (5)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (5)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 871 - 878 of 878
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Judicial Criticism Of Legislation By Courts, Charles G. Haines
Judicial Criticism Of Legislation By Courts, Charles G. Haines
Michigan Law Review
In the application of the doctrine of judicial review of legislative acts, the federal courts of the United States have not infrequently been criticised for usurping part of the functions of the legislature. The criticisms have increased to such an extent as to raise an issue of national significance. Recently, charges against the judiciary for the usurpation of legislative functions have been made rather frequently by the justices of our federal Supreme Comt. The late Associate Justice Harlan, dissenting in part from the reasoning of the majority of the court in the Standard Oil case, brought such a criticism against …
Is A Judgment Open To Collateral Attack If Rendered Without Written Pleadings As Required By Statute, Or If The Writings Do Not Comply With The Statutory Requirements?, John R. Rood
Articles
It is believed that no good reason can be assigned for answering the above question in the affirmative. Certainly none has yet been discovered in a careful search of the cases involving the point. And yet the assurance and unanimity with which lawyers and judges give the affirmative answer to it on first thought is indeed remarkable. For instance, Mr. Justice FIELD in speaking for the Supreme Court of the United States, on the question as to whether a judgment is subject to collateral attack if one served with process is not permitted to make any defense when he appears …
The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Articles
After twenty-one years the Sherman Anti Trust Act has been applied to the typical combination restraining interstate commerce, which that act was designed to prevent.
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Corporation Tax, Ralph W. Aigler
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Corporation Tax, Ralph W. Aigler
Articles
During the special session of Congress held the past summer there was enacted as an amendment to the new Tariff Law what is generally known as the Federal Corporation Tax.1 At the time of its consideration in Congress and since its enactment there has been considerable discussion regarding the constitutionality of the measure, and no little doubt has been expressed as to its validity.
Labor Organizations In Legislation, Jerome C. Knowlton
Labor Organizations In Legislation, Jerome C. Knowlton
Articles
During the first months of the current year, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down three decisions on important questions in labor legislation.1 The Employers' Liability Act was declared unconstitutional, but on grounds that may be avoided by subsequent legislation; the boycott was decided to be an unlawful conspiracy against interstate commerce, and in violation of the Anti-Trust Act and the congressional enactment providing criminal punishment for the discharge of an employee because of his membership in a labor organization was also held unconstitutional. These decisions have been unjustly spoken of by some, as unreasonably severe on labor …
Supreme Court And Unconstitutional Acts Of Congress, Edwin S. Corwin
Supreme Court And Unconstitutional Acts Of Congress, Edwin S. Corwin
Michigan Law Review
The power of the Supreme Court of the United States to supervise Congressional legislation has been so generally assumed in the recent discussions, both in and out of Congress, of the proposed Rate Bill, and is indeed so apparently settled today that it becomes of interest to inquire into the intention of the Constitutional Fathers in this matter. Did the Fathers intend that the federal judiciary should have the right to declare an act of Congress of no effect because transgressing constitutional limits? It does not detract from the interest of this question that two recent authorities who attempt to …
A Treatise On The Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon The Legislative Power Of The States Of The American Union, Thomas M. Cooley
A Treatise On The Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon The Legislative Power Of The States Of The American Union, Thomas M. Cooley
Books
In the Preface to the first edition of this work. the author stated its purpose to be, to furnish to the practitioner and the student of the law such a presentation of elementary constitutional principles as should serve, with the aid of its references to judicial decisions, legal treatises, and historical events, as a convenient guide in the examination of questions respecting the constitutional limitations which rest upon the power of the several State legislatures. …
Preface to the 4th Edition: "New topics in State Constitutional Law are not numerous; but such as are suggested by recent decisions have been …
Limits To State Control Of Private Business, Thomas M. Cooley
Limits To State Control Of Private Business, Thomas M. Cooley
Articles
The present purpose is to inquire whether, in the matter of the regulation of property rights and of business, legislation has not of late been occupying doubtful, possibly unconstitutional grounds. The discussion in the main must be limited to fundamental.-principles, aided by such light as legal and constitutional history may throw upon them, since the express provisions of the constitutions can give little assistance. They always contain the general guaranty of due process of law to life, liberty, and property, but in other particulars they for the most part leave protection to principles which have come from the common law. …