Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- University of Michigan Law School (137)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (88)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (45)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (37)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (35)
- Fordham Law School (30)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (27)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- University of Richmond (13)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- The University of Akron (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Boston University School of Law (6)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (133)
- United States Supreme Court (124)
- Constitution (87)
- Jurisprudence (87)
- Constitutional law (61)
-
- Federal (50)
- State (47)
- New York (39)
- Defendant (33)
- Judicial review (31)
- 1990) (30)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Stare decisis (29)
- Due process (28)
- Judges (28)
- First Amendment (27)
- § 6 (27)
- Constitutional interpretation (25)
- Law (25)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (25)
- Originalism (25)
- Supreme Court of the United States (25)
- Federalism (24)
- Fourteenth Amendment (23)
- Police (23)
- Statutory interpretation (23)
- Discrimination (22)
- Federal courts (22)
- Separation of powers (21)
- Fifth Amendment (20)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (96)
- Touro Law Review (82)
- Faculty Scholarship (56)
-
- Publications (37)
- Northwestern University Law Review (31)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (30)
- Articles (25)
- Arkansas Law Review (19)
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (13)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Akron Law Review (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (10)
- Brooklyn Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (9)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (9)
- University of Richmond Law Review (9)
- Journal Articles (8)
- Scholarly Articles (8)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (8)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Publication Type
Articles 961 - 990 of 1114
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Legislative Inputs And Gender-Based Discrimination In The Burger Court, Earl M. Maltz
Legislative Inputs And Gender-Based Discrimination In The Burger Court, Earl M. Maltz
Michigan Law Review
In An Interpretive History of Modem Equal Protection, Michael Klarman poses a powerful challenge to the conventional wisdom regarding the structure of Burger Court jurisprudence. Most commentators have concluded that during the Burger era the Court lacked a coherent vision of constitutional law, and was given to a "rootless" activism or a "pragmatic" approach to constitutional analysis. Klarman argues that, at least in the area of equal protection analysis, the Burger Court's approach did reflect a unifying theme, which he describes as a focus on "legislative inputs." According to Klarman, this approach "directs judicial review towards purging legislative decision-making of …
Section 1983 And Implied Rights Of Action: Rights, Remedies, And Realism, Michael A. Mazzuchi
Section 1983 And Implied Rights Of Action: Rights, Remedies, And Realism, Michael A. Mazzuchi
Michigan Law Review
This Note criticizes the Court's current reconciliation of the implied right of action and section 1983 inquiries, and argues that the availability of lawsuits under section 1983 should be the same as under an implied right of action test. Part I, by offering a working definition of rights, suggests an approach to identifying statutorily created rights. Part II discusses the evolution of the Court's implied right of action ' jurisprudence, and explores several explanations for the Court's hesitancy to create implied rights of action. Part III examines the influence of the Court's implied right of action test on its jurisprudence …
Balancing Commerce, History, And Geography: Defining The Navigable Waters Of The United States, John F. Baughman
Balancing Commerce, History, And Geography: Defining The Navigable Waters Of The United States, John F. Baughman
Michigan Law Review
This Note develops a simple set of principles useful for defining navigable waters in a contemporary context. Part I considers why federal admiralty jurisdiction exists, and traces the evolution of the phrase navigable waters as a term of art. Part II analyzes the conflicting contemporary definitions of navigable waters. Part III resolves the conflict by proposing guidelines that address the major concerns of all competing definitions. The system advocated is consistent with the goals of admiralty, constitutionally sound, easy to apply, and focuses attention on the nexus test to resolve the issue of whether particular cases "belong" in admiralty.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Muncipal Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes For A Consistent And Meaningful Sixth Amendment, Randolph N. Jonakait
Notes For A Consistent And Meaningful Sixth Amendment, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
A Mirror For The Magistrate, Paul Campos
"The Right To Bear Arms": Two Views, Lee Fisher, David C. Tryon
"The Right To Bear Arms": Two Views, Lee Fisher, David C. Tryon
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The authors provide varying opinions on the Second Amendment.
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Strenuous Virtues, Virtuous Lives: The Social Vision Of Antonin Scalia, George Kannar
Strenuous Virtues, Virtuous Lives: The Social Vision Of Antonin Scalia, George Kannar
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.