Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (344)
- Seattle University School of Law (202)
- University of Michigan Law School (153)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (128)
- William & Mary Law School (46)
-
- Roger Williams University (27)
- University of Colorado Law School (27)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (22)
- Georgetown University Law Center (21)
- UIC School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (20)
- American University Washington College of Law (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- Fordham Law School (17)
- Boston University School of Law (15)
- Emory University School of Law (15)
- Cleveland State University (14)
- Duke Law (14)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (14)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (13)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- New York Law School (12)
- Notre Dame Law School (12)
- St. Mary's University (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- Washington University in St. Louis (11)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (210)
- United States Supreme Court (165)
- Constitution (100)
- Judges (74)
- Constitutional law (55)
-
- Federal (47)
- Judge (45)
- Justice (45)
- State (40)
- Courts (37)
- Judicial review (36)
- SCOTUS (36)
- New York (32)
- Defendant (31)
- Jurisprudence (31)
- Court of Appeals (28)
- History (28)
- Supreme Court of the United States (28)
- Court (26)
- Judiciary (25)
- Congress (24)
- Due process (24)
- Law (24)
- 1990) (23)
- Supreme Court Justices (23)
- Politics (22)
- Textualism (22)
- Equality (21)
- Federalism (21)
- First Amendment (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (323)
- Seattle University Law Review (202)
- Touro Law Review (120)
- Michigan Law Review (86)
- Faculty Scholarship (57)
-
- Articles (48)
- Publications (26)
- Scholarly Articles (24)
- Northwestern University Law Review (18)
- Faculty Articles (16)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (16)
- Supreme Court Preview (15)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (13)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (13)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (12)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Law Student Publications (12)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (12)
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (11)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (11)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- Fordham Law Review (10)
- William & Mary Law Review (10)
- Law Faculty Publications (9)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (9)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (9)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (8)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1321 - 1350 of 1454
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Choosing Judges The Democratic Way, Larry Yackle
Choosing Judges The Democratic Way, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
A generation ago, the pressing question in constitutional law was the countermajoritarian difficulty.' Americans insisted their government was a democratic republic and took that to mean rule by a majority of elected representatives in various offices and bodies, federal and local. Yet courts whose members had not won election presumed to override the actions of executive and legislative officers who had. The conventional answer to this apparent paradox was the Constitution, which arguably owed its existence to the people directly. Judicial review was justified, accordingly, when court decisions were rooted firmly in the particular text, structure, or historical backdrop of …
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment, William E. Hellerstein
"Bad" Judicial Activism And Liberal Federal-Courts Doctrine: A Comment On Professor Doernberg And Professor Redish, Jack M. Beermann
"Bad" Judicial Activism And Liberal Federal-Courts Doctrine: A Comment On Professor Doernberg And Professor Redish, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
JUDUCIAL ACTIVISM IS often portrayed as a liberal vice. This perception is wrong both historically and, as Professor Redish argues, 3 currently as well. The federal judiciary has been and still is an activist institution, working with both substantive law and jurisdictional rules to achieve its own policy goals. It has done this in statutory, constitutional, and common-law matters. Specifically, the Supreme Court of the United States has actively-shaped the jurisdiction of the federal courts in a restrictive and generally conservative manner.
Professors Doernberg4 and Redish attack this last form of activism by the federal courts, activism in shaping …
First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Weighted Voting, Richard David Emery ,Esq.
Justice Cardozo, One-Ninth Of The Supreme Court, Milton Handler, Michael Ruby
Justice Cardozo, One-Ninth Of The Supreme Court, Milton Handler, Michael Ruby
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Process As An Empirical Study: A Comment On Justice Brennan's Essay, Charles M. Yablon
Judicial Process As An Empirical Study: A Comment On Justice Brennan's Essay, Charles M. Yablon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reason, Passion, And “The Progress Of The Law”, William J. Brennan Jr.
Reason, Passion, And “The Progress Of The Law”, William J. Brennan Jr.
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Addendum: Civil Rights In Jeopardy, Eileen R. Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Addendum: Civil Rights In Jeopardy, Eileen R. Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
Doing Politics In The United States Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 265 (1988), John D. Gorby
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural And Substantive Problems In Complex Litigation Arising From Disasters, Jack B. Weinstein
Procedural And Substantive Problems In Complex Litigation Arising From Disasters, Jack B. Weinstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Anti-Antitrust Activist?; Podium, Robert H. Lande
An Anti-Antitrust Activist?; Podium, Robert H. Lande
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judicial Trial Skills Training, Stephen M. Simon, Bertrand Poritsky
Judicial Trial Skills Training, Stephen M. Simon, Bertrand Poritsky
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Judges Or Scholars: To Whom Shall We Look For Our Constitutional Law?, Andrew L. Kaufman
Judges Or Scholars: To Whom Shall We Look For Our Constitutional Law?, Andrew L. Kaufman
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Federal Government: A View From Congress, Senator Orrin G. Hatch
Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Federal Government: A View From Congress, Senator Orrin G. Hatch
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Conservative As Liberal: The Religion Clauses, Liberal Neutrality, And The Approach Of Justice O'Connor, 62 Notre Dame L. Rev. 151 (1987), Donald L. Beschle
The Conservative As Liberal: The Religion Clauses, Liberal Neutrality, And The Approach Of Justice O'Connor, 62 Notre Dame L. Rev. 151 (1987), Donald L. Beschle
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
On The Constitutional Status Of The Administrative Agencies, Harold H. Bruff
On The Constitutional Status Of The Administrative Agencies, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
American Indians And The Bicentennial, Richard B. Collins
American Indians And The Bicentennial, Richard B. Collins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Strict Constructionism And The Strike Zone, Douglas O. Linder
Strict Constructionism And The Strike Zone, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
Between Skylla And Charybdis: The Eleventh Circuit Rushes Toward Disaster In Tucker V. Kemp, Marshall Dayan
Between Skylla And Charybdis: The Eleventh Circuit Rushes Toward Disaster In Tucker V. Kemp, Marshall Dayan
Antioch Law Journal
In January 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided the case of Hance v. Zant. Establishing a stringent standard apparently in line with the Supreme Court's requirement of heightened reliability in capital cases, the Eleventh Circuit reversed Hance's death sentence. The court held, inter alia, that the prosecutor's inflammatory closing argument at the end of the sentencing phase of the trial was violative of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Six months later, in a group of four other death penalty cases, the United States Supreme Court dismissed challenges to the sentencing process.2 The Court held …
Justices And Presidents: A Political History Of Appointments To The Supreme Court (2d Edition), James S. Portnoy
Justices And Presidents: A Political History Of Appointments To The Supreme Court (2d Edition), James S. Portnoy
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court (2d edition) by Henry J. Abraham
Statesman Of The Old Republic, Craig Joyce
Statesman Of The Old Republic, Craig Joyce
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story: Statesman of the Old Republic by R. Kent Newmyer
Judge Picking, Abner J. Mikva
Judge Picking, Abner J. Mikva
Michigan Law Review
A Review of God Save This Honorable Court: How the Choice of Supreme Court Justices Shapes Our History by Laurence H. Tribe