Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- University of Michigan Law School (104)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (35)
- William & Mary Law School (13)
- Emory University School of Law (9)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- The University of Akron (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- Keyword
-
- Police (77)
- Fourth Amendment (73)
- United States Supreme Court (71)
- Searches (53)
- Supreme Court (53)
-
- Privacy (42)
- Exclusionary rule (39)
- Constitution (36)
- Probable cause (33)
- Seizures (33)
- Warrant (25)
- Fourth amendment (24)
- Fifth Amendment (22)
- Federal (21)
- Miranda v. Arizona (21)
- Mapp v. Ohio (20)
- Search and seizure (20)
- Evidence (17)
- Search warrants (17)
- Admissibility (15)
- Defendant (15)
- Search (15)
- § 12 (15)
- Law (14)
- Surveillance (14)
- Technology (13)
- Katz v. United States (12)
- Sixth Amendment (12)
- State (12)
- Warren Court (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (186)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
- Touro Law Review (33)
- Articles (30)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
-
- Faculty Articles (9)
- Publications (6)
- Book Chapters (5)
- Cleveland State Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Akron Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (4)
- Popular Media (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Georgia Law Review (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Michigan Law Review Online (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 470
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Better-Off Walking: Wyoming V. Houghton Exemplifies What Acevedo Failed To Rectify, Erin Morris Meadows
Better-Off Walking: Wyoming V. Houghton Exemplifies What Acevedo Failed To Rectify, Erin Morris Meadows
University of Richmond Law Review
Over the years the United States Supreme Court attempted to produce bright-line rules governing the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. However, the Court's numerous, often confusing decisions in the past eight decades served only to blur those lines. With each attempt to fashion rules that would be workable for both law enforcement in application and lower courts in administration, citizens' Fourth Amendment rights were narrowed. Each time the Court attempted to clarify a rule, it expanded police power to conduct virtually limitless warrantless searches, consistently eviscerating personal privacy rights. The result is an exception originally intended to …
What Are The Limits On Warrantless Drug Testing Of Pregnant Women?, Richard W. Garnett
What Are The Limits On Warrantless Drug Testing Of Pregnant Women?, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
From the Issue
Does the special-needs doctrine permit warrantless drug tests of pregnant women at a public hospital when the hospital's testing policy is designed in cooperation with police and prosecutors, and when test results are shared with law-enforcement officials and used to present women with a choice between treatment and arrest?
Recovering The Original Fourth Amendment, Thomas Y. Davies
Recovering The Original Fourth Amendment, Thomas Y. Davies
Michigan Law Review
Claims regarding the original or intended meaning of constitutional texts are commonplace in constitutional argument and analysis. All such claims are subject to an implicit validity criterion - only historically authentic assertions should matter. The rub is that the original meaning commonly attributed to a constitutional text may not be authentic. The historical Fourth Amendment is a case in point. If American judges, lawyers, or law teachers were asked what the Framers intended when they adopted the Fourth Amendment, they would likely answer that the Framers intended that all searches and seizures conducted by government officers must be reasonable given …
Confessions, Search And Seizure And The Rehnquist Court, Yale Kamisar
Confessions, Search And Seizure And The Rehnquist Court, Yale Kamisar
Articles
About the time William Rehnquist ascended to the Chief Justiceship of the United States, two events occurred that increased the likelihood that Miranda would enjoy a long life. In Moran v. Burbine,' a 6-3 majority held that a confession preceded by an otherwise valid waiver of a suspect's Miranda rights should not be excluded either (a) because the police misled an inquiring attorney when they told her they were not going to question the suspect she called about or (b) because the police failed to inform the suspect of the attorney's efforts to reach him.
Race, Rights, And Remedies In Criminal Adjudication, Pamela S. Karlan
Race, Rights, And Remedies In Criminal Adjudication, Pamela S. Karlan
Michigan Law Review
Once upon a time, back before the Warren Court, criminal procedure and racial justice were adjacent hinterlands in constitutional law's empire. In 1954, the fifth edition of Dowling's constitutional law casebook contained one chapter on "procedural due process" in which six of the eight cases were about criminal justice, and three of those - Powell v. Alabama, Moore v. Dempsey, and Bailey v. Alabama - were as much about race as they were about crime. A few pages later, two slender chapters on the "national protection of civil rights" and "equal protection of the laws" contained seven and nine decisions, …
An Ode To Probable Cause: A Brief Response To Professors Amar And Slobogin, Scott E. Sundby
An Ode To Probable Cause: A Brief Response To Professors Amar And Slobogin, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Having It Both Ways: Proof That The U.S. Supreme Court Is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented, Christopher Slobogin
Having It Both Ways: Proof That The U.S. Supreme Court Is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
If the assertions that this essay makes about the Court's "unfair" prosecution-orientation withstand scrutiny," two further conclusions might follow. First, the highest court in the country is so fixated on ensuring that a particular side wins that it is willing with some frequency to sacrifice the most basic attribute of any court worthy of the name-the appearance of fairness. This conclusion is a much more fundamental challenge to the Court's integrity than is the simple acknowledgement that a majority of the Justices are biased in favor of the government. Second, to the extent the Court's unfairness becomes common knowledge, its …
Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker
Counter-Revolution In Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, Carol S. Steiker
Michigan Law Review
For the purposes of my argument, I adapt Professor Meir Dan-Cohen's distinction (which he in turn borrowed from Jeremy Bentham) between "conduct" rules and "decision" rules. Bentham and Dan-Cohen make this distinction in the context of substantive criminal law; for their purposes, "conduct" rules are addressed to the general public in order to guide its behavior (for example, "Let no person steal") and "decision" rules are addressed to public officials in order to guide their decisionmaking about the consequences of violating conduct rules (for example, "Let the judge cause whoever is convicted of stealing to be hanged"). But as any …
Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave
Computers, Urinals, And The Fourth Amendment: Confessions Of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. Lafave
Michigan Law Review
At least the title indicates that the article is somehow concerned with "the Fourth Amendment," though for anyone who knows me or is at all familiar with my work, that piece of information hardly would come as a revelation. The fact of the matter is that I almost always write about the Fourth Amendment; I am in an academic rut so deep as to deserve recognition in the Guinness Book World of Records. Search and seizure has been my cheval de bataille during my entire time as a law professor and even when I was a mere law student. …
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
To Act Or Not? That Is The Question: Self-Incrimination And The Sole Proprietor, Raymond G. Keenan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Welsh S. White
Improving Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Welsh S. White
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution by Craig M. Bradley
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Many commentators have observed that when we speak of "the Warren Court," we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1962 (when Arthur Goldberg replaced Felix Frankfurter) to 1969 (when Earl Warren retired). But when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1961 (when the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio was decided) to 1966 or 1967. In its final years, the Warren Court was not the same Court that had handed down Mapp or Miranda v. Arizona.
Everyman's Fourth Amendment: Privacy Or Mutual Trust Between Government And Citizen, Scott E. Sundby
Everyman's Fourth Amendment: Privacy Or Mutual Trust Between Government And Citizen, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
There Goes The Neighborhood: The Evolution Of "Family" In Local Zoning Ordinances, William Graham
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.