Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (200)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- University of Michigan Law School (102)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (70)
- University of Richmond (34)
-
- William & Mary Law School (31)
- The University of Akron (17)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (14)
- St. John's University School of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (12)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (10)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (10)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- Roger Williams University (9)
- St. Mary's University (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (8)
- Brooklyn Law School (7)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- Emory University School of Law (7)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- Georgia State University College of Law (6)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- University of Washington School of Law (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (87)
- United States Supreme Court (72)
- Constitution (56)
- Death penalty (44)
- Federal (43)
-
- State (40)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Eighth Amendment (34)
- New York (32)
- Sentencing (31)
- Criminal Law (30)
- Criminal law (30)
- 1990) (29)
- Defendant (29)
- Fourth Amendment (27)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (25)
- Sixth Amendment (25)
- Court of Appeals (24)
- Law (22)
- Due process (20)
- Evidence (20)
- Police (20)
- § 6 (18)
- Fifth Amendment (17)
- Punishment (16)
- Criminal (15)
- Jury (15)
- Privacy (14)
- Judge (13)
- Appellate Division (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (197)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (65)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- University of Richmond Law Review (29)
-
- Supreme Court Preview (25)
- Articles (23)
- Akron Law Review (16)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (10)
- Faculty Publications (10)
- Scholarly Articles (10)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (8)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (8)
- Cleveland State Law Review (7)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (7)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (7)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (6)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (6)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (6)
- Washington Law Review (6)
- Northwestern University Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications By Year (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Maine Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 721 - 750 of 851
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
The "Solely Criminal Purpose" Defense To The Enforcement Of Irs Summonses, Darius J. Mehraban
The "Solely Criminal Purpose" Defense To The Enforcement Of Irs Summonses, Darius J. Mehraban
Michigan Law Review
Recent years have witnessed a gradual erosion of the practical distinctions between the civil and criminal investigations performed by federal administrative agencies. This trend arose naturally from a growing number of federal statutes and regulations that carry both civil and criminal penalties for their violation. Administrative agencies today wield investigative summons power almost as expansive as the grand jury subpoena power and can use that power to investigate without first deciding whether criminal or civil liability ultimately will be sought. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has participated to some extent in this intermingling of civil and criminal inquiry - with …
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race, Redistricting And A Republican Poll Tax: The Supreme Court's Voting Rights Decisions Of The 1995-96 Term, Frank Parker
Race, Redistricting And A Republican Poll Tax: The Supreme Court's Voting Rights Decisions Of The 1995-96 Term, Frank Parker
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, An Appeal By Any Other Name: Congress's Empty Victory Over Habeas Rights--Felker V. Turpin, 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996), Scott Moss
Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
The Limits Of Legal Language: Decisionmaking In Capital Cases, Jordan M. Steiker
The Limits Of Legal Language: Decisionmaking In Capital Cases, Jordan M. Steiker
Michigan Law Review
To make the case for the proposed changes, I will first describe briefly in Parts I and II the structure of pre- and post-Furman capital decisiorurtaking and the weaknesses of those approaches. I then will set forth in Part III the specific rationales for each proposed reform.
The scheme I propose raises a significant constitutional question. Can the death penalty be retained as a punishment if we abandon the pretense of providing meaningful guidance through detailed sentencing instructions? Would the reestablishment of relatively unstructured penalty phase deliberations similar to, but also importantly different from, those characteristic of pre-Furman …
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
(Adapted by permission from 84 Ky. L. J. 107 (1995)) This article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessiveness regarding prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportional to the crime punished. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, one finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is …
Petty Offenses, Serious Consequences: Multiple Petty Offenses And The Sixth Amendment Right To Jury Trial, Jeff E. Butler
Petty Offenses, Serious Consequences: Multiple Petty Offenses And The Sixth Amendment Right To Jury Trial, Jeff E. Butler
Michigan Law Review
In Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, the Supreme Court set forth the definitive standard for distinguishing petty offenses from serious crimes.7 The benchmark used by the Court is the maximum prison term assigned to each offense by the legislature. Where the penalty exceeds six months' imprisonment, the offense is serious enough to trigger the right to jury trial. Where the penalty is six months' imprisonment or less, there is a strong presumption that the offense is petty; therefore, a defendant accused of that offense has no Sixth Amendment right to jury trial.
This Note argues that a criminal …
Section 9: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing: The Supreme Court's Tortured Approach To Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Steven P. Grossman
Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing: The Supreme Court's Tortured Approach To Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessive prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportionate to the crime. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, this Article finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is confused, and what law can be discerned rests on weak foundations. …
Section 5: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Of Laws And Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View Of Criminal Procedure, Daniel C. Richman, Bruce A. Green
Of Laws And Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View Of Criminal Procedure, Daniel C. Richman, Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
As a general rule, criminal defendants whose cases made it to the Supreme Court between 1967 and 1991 must have thought that, as long as Justice Thurgood Marshall occupied one of the nine seats, they had one vote for sure. And Justice Marshall rarely disappointed them – certainly not in cases of any broad constitutional significance. From his votes and opinions, particularly his dissents, many were quick to conclude that the Justice was another of those "bleeding heart liberals," hostile to the mission of law enforcement officers and ready to overlook the gravity of the crimes of which the defendants …
Precedents In A Vacuum: The Supreme Court Continues To Tinker With Double Jeopardy, Peter J. Henning
Precedents In A Vacuum: The Supreme Court Continues To Tinker With Double Jeopardy, Peter J. Henning
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Capital Punishment's Future, Welsh S. White
Capital Punishment's Future, Welsh S. White
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Capital Punishment in America by Raymond Paternoster
A Note To Our Readers, The Editors
Constitutional Posture Of Canine Sniffs, Lina Shahin
Constitutional Posture Of Canine Sniffs, Lina Shahin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.