Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

State and Local Government Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Ohio

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 901 - 930 of 955

Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law

Appeal No. 0086: Randy D. Brown V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Apr 1985

Appeal No. 0086: Randy D. Brown V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chiefs Orders 84-05 and 84-24

Go to article

Appeal No. 0110: Board Of Trustees Of Eaton Township, Lorain County V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Oct 1984

Appeal No. 0110: Board Of Trustees Of Eaton Township, Lorain County V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0080: Convest Energy Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0080: Convest Energy Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-85

Go to article

Appeal No. 0084: John G. Foraker V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0084: John G. Foraker V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0081: An-Car Oil Co., Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0081: An-Car Oil Co., Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-88

Go to article

Appeal No. 0088: Sheldon R. Turrill V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0088: Sheldon R. Turrill V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0093: Charlesbois Energy Production, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0093: Charlesbois Energy Production, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0089: Akron Petroleum Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0089: Akron Petroleum Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-88

Go to article

Appeal No. 0087: Pioneer Oil Company, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0087: Pioneer Oil Company, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0077: Universal Exploration, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0077: Universal Exploration, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-75

Go to article

Appeal No. 0083: Murphy Oil Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0083: Murphy Oil Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0079: Wray Petroleum Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0079: Wray Petroleum Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-77

Go to article

Appeal No. 0082: R & M Well Service, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1984

Appeal No. 0082: R & M Well Service, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-90

Go to article

Appeal No. 0071: The Toledo Edison Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1984

Appeal No. 0071: The Toledo Edison Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-67

Go to article

Appeal No. 0064: Trenton Energy, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1984

Appeal No. 0064: Trenton Energy, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-26

Go to article

Appeal No. 0073: Commerce Operating, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1984

Appeal No. 0073: Commerce Operating, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0069: Integrated Petroleum Co.. Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1984

Appeal No. 0069: Integrated Petroleum Co.. Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-42

Go to article

Appeal No. 0063: Victor Petroleum Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Sep 1983

Appeal No. 0063: Victor Petroleum Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 83-14

Go to article

Appeal No. 0056: Gasearch, Inc., Et Al. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jul 1983

Appeal No. 0056: Gasearch, Inc., Et Al. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Issuance of Permit 3180

Go to article

Appeal No. 0060: Akron Petroleum, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Apr 1983

Appeal No. 0060: Akron Petroleum, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0058: Horn Resources Corp. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1983

Appeal No. 0058: Horn Resources Corp. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0057: The Oxford Oil Company V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Mar 1983

Appeal No. 0057: The Oxford Oil Company V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Appeal No. 0054: James Drilling Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Feb 1983

Appeal No. 0054: James Drilling Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Adjudication Order 374

Go to article

Appeal No. 0053: Russell Township Board Of Trustees Of Geauga County V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1983

Appeal No. 0053: Russell Township Board Of Trustees Of Geauga County V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Adjudication Order 357

Go to article

Appeal No. 0052: In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Petroleum Securities, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review Jan 1983

Appeal No. 0052: In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Petroleum Securities, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Adjudication Order No. 350

Go to article

The Ohio Bill Of Rights, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

The Ohio Bill Of Rights, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Evaluating Article 2 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Preliminary Empirical Expedition, James J. White May 1977

Evaluating Article 2 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Preliminary Empirical Expedition, James J. White

Articles

A proponent of commercial law codification, Mr. Eaton was one of the first American lawyers to perceive that mere codification of the law did not necessarily produce certainty and lack of discord in the law of commercial transactions. Indeed, in the same article Eaton reveals that of the 1,091 cases that had arisen under the Negotiable Instruments Law, only 704 cited the Act and in the other 387 "the Negotiable Instruments Law [was] ignored by the courts in the decisions, and (so far as the reports show) by the counsel in these cases...." Unlike Bentham, Carter, and Field, each of …

Go to article

How Citizens Can Use The Initiative Power, Robert L. Scott Oct 1973

How Citizens Can Use The Initiative Power, Robert L. Scott

IUSTITIA

The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate how the initiative power may be employed by citizens wishing to pass a law independent of the state legislature. Although the initiative power is granted in many state constitutions, in the past it has been used sparingly. However during these days of political activism the initiative power has been given new vitality. For example, in the area of environmental law it has been employed by citizens groups in such states as California, Illinois, and Wisconsin to reserve greater individual rights against environmental polluters.

Go to article

A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones Jan 1973

A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones

Cleveland State Law Review

The recent expansion of the use of administrative agencies to facilitate the functioning of the various levels of governmental operations has created a correspondingly complex morass of procedural law. Administrative procedure being the creation of administrative law, a definition of the latter is necessary for an understanding of the former. This area of law has been demarcated by "the provisions of statutes conferring rule making and adjudicatory powers upon organizations in government outside the judicial branch and orders entered by these agencies pursuant to such powers."' It should be noted, however, that this definition, like other brief definitions of broad …

Go to article

Disorderly Conduct Statutes And Ohio, Charles M. Young Jan 1973

Disorderly Conduct Statutes And Ohio, Charles M. Young

Cleveland State Law Review

In Ohio, as throughout the country, the peace and good order of communities are often protected by vague disorderly conduct statutes which fail to sufficiently define prohibited conduct. The failure of such statutes to provide specific standards for enforcement, and the determination of the courts to uphold these laws, may lead to an arbitrary standard of justice. Whens the courts are presented with a vagueness question concerning an archaic city or state statute, they should be eager to void, rather than careful to limit and interpret the language of the law. It is the duty of the legislatures to provide …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last