State and Local Government Law Commons^™

University Of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 55, Issue 1 (Fall 2024)

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

How The Forgotten Tools Of The Clean Water Act Can Restore The Chesapeake Bay With Fewer Consequences, Evan Isaacson, Kennedi Fichtel

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: Freeman V. State, Madison Hine

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: In Re M.P., Caroline Byrd

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: Lithko Contracting, Llc V. Xl Ins. Am., Inc., Travis Mobley

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Key

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Empowering Survivors Of Child Sexual Abuse: How Maryland Should Amend The Child Victims Act To Survive Constitutional Review, Raquel Hyatt

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

From Berlin To Baltimore: Adopting German Recycling Policies For Cleaner Air, Cameron Luzarraga

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: Westminster Mgmt., Llc V. Smith, Spencer Baldacci, Jessica Kweon, Ryan Powelson

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

The Contemporary Case For Consumer Expectations: Reevaluating The Evolution Of The Original Defect Standard And Its Place In Modern Products Litigation, Alyssa Clune

Fordham Law Review

The consumer expectations standard for design defect has been the subject of fierce debate since its inception. Though many see it as the test that best reflects the plaintiff-friendly goals of products liability, others critique it as vague, outdated, and ripe for jury misuse. Once the primary test for design defect under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, the consumer expectations test has since been rejected by the Restatement (Third) of Torts, and its use has been eliminated or restricted in approximately half of all states in favor of the risk-utility test. Much of the reasoning behind this growing rejection revolves …

Section 1983 And Voting Rights: A Case Study On The Materiality Provision And The Future Of Private Enforcement, Paul Feingold

Fordham Law Review

A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit stating that § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is not enforceable by private litigants under an implied private right of action has many voting rights advocates rightfully concerned about the future of federal voting rights protections. Indeed, that ruling appears partly motivated by signals from the U.S. Supreme Court. However, not all hope is lost. In Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski, the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed its Gonzaga University v. Doe test for enforcing a statute under § 1983. …

Board Of Pharmacy, Catherine Santos, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Public Utilities Commission, Francesca Nevil, Flávia Martini Andrade Da Silva, Wyatt Page, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Maryland And The Push For Data Privacy, Michael Mellon

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

State Regulation Of Wetlands Post-Sackett: Assessing And Improving Maryland’S Wetlands Policies And Legal Tools To Better Protect State Wetlands, Kai Hardy

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: In The Matter Of Antavis Chavis, Annie Segall

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Excluded But Equal, Gali Racabi

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Work law is excessively exclusionary. Canonical examples include agriculture workers, independent contractors, and domestic workers. But work law excludes far more workers and employers than those familiar categories. Whole sectors, occupations, business sizes, wage arrangements, geographical areas, and more are excluded from the basic tenets of economic citizenship, including federal, state, and local minimum wage; overtime; and safety and labor protection laws.

Equal protection claims govern the authority of legislatures to determine who is in and who is out of work laws. Excluded workers and included employers now routinely use state and federal constitutional equal protection arguments against exclusionary work …

The Demise Of Housing First Policy: The New Missouri Policy That Criminalizes Homelessness, Kaitlyn Frerking

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

This Note examines the potential negative complications of Missouri H.B. 1606. The Note also explores possible avenues for relief through litigation or policy reform. H.B. 1606 is a Missouri state bill that altered the State’s policy towards decreasing the rate of homelessness in the State of Missouri. Prior to H.B. 1606, Missouri’s homelessness policy resembled a “Housing First” approach where emphasis was placed on providing affordable permanent housing to those without homes. With the passage of H.B. 1606, the policy turned towards supporting short-term housing initiatives and abandoned the “Housing First” approach. H.B. 1606 also contains a provision that makes …

The Uncertain Future Of Restorative Justice: Anti-Woke Legislation, Retrenchment And Politics Of The Right, Thalia González, Mara Schiff

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

As diverse forms of anti-democratic and anti-inclusionary politics escalate in the United States, public education is increasingly a site for retrenchment and contestation with targeted efforts to silence and erase civil rights victories for equity and access. Addressing a critical, yet unattended issue at the intersection of education law and policy and civil rights, this Article joins with the growing discourse interrogating the “parental rights” movement and racially regressive legislation. Employing a case study analysis of social movement activism and education policy legislation from 2018–2023 in Florida, it aims to provoke critical praxis emanating from essential inquiry— what is the …

Dental Board Of California, Shun Lam, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Department Of Insurance, Lisette Cruz, Alexander Cesta, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Barbering And Cosmetology, Isaiah Artis, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Department Of Managed Health, Zoe Bulls, Marcus Friedman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Masking Identity At Public Protests, Deborah R. Gerhardt

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

As masks have become increasingly popular at public protests, government officials, college administrators and law enforcement are struggling with how to handle masked protesters who evade responsibility for violence and intimidation. While some wear masks to safely engage in anonymous speech, others wear them to avoid accountability for violence and intimidation.

This Article will explore these issues to assist those seeking to enact constitutionally valid mask policies. To situate today’s mask regulation challenges in the context of American history, Part I reviews events that led to enactment of anti-mask laws many years ago. Part II explains when the First Amendment …

Does History Repeat Itself? Analyzing Montana's 2023 Draft Wolf Management Plan In Light Of Historical Misconceptions Of Wolves, Katelyn Jones

William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review

This Note intends to argue that Montana’s Draft Wolf Management Plan, when compared to other states’ plans, particularly Wisconsin’s, is inadequate because it contains many indicators of the antiquated societal bias that has plagued the wolf’s reputation for centuries. Part I begins with a historical overview of wolf hysteria and controversy beginning in Europe and extending to colonial America. Included in Part I is a specific focus on the treatment of wolves in Yellowstone and Montana during the early 1900s. Part I ends with an overview of the reintroduction of wolves into the [Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem] GYE and the success …

Law School News: From Ideas To Political Action 10-2024, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Legal Malpractice In Florida: A Statistical Profile, Robert M. Jarvis, Debra Moss Vollweiler

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

Little empirical research exists about the incidence of legal malpractice. To help fill the gap, the authors spent 1,000 hours mining the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation’s legal malpractice database, a rich but underutilized resource. As their results make clear, every lawyer—no matter their gender, education, location, experience, or type of practice—is at risk of being sued for legal malpractice.

Want To Solve Labor Shortages? Relaxing The Child Labor Law Is Not The Answer, Yi Wu

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

Recently, the United States has been engaged in a nationwide debate over loosening regulations regarding children’s employment. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets restrictions on the working hours of children under 16 and prohibits their employment in certain hazardous positions. However, some states, such as Iowa, Ohio, Arkansas, and Wisconsin, have either passed or are considering legislation allowing children to work longer hours or in potentially dangerous conditions in response to labor shortages. These new state laws conflict with existing federal regulations. This Comment discusses why states should refrain from relaxing their child labor laws to permit children to …

Back To The Future: Revisiting State Constitutions To Protect Against New Technological Intrusions, Matthew Radford

Washington and Lee Law Review

The Fourth Amendment is crucial for protecting Americans from government intrusion. However, new technologies such as pole cameras, reverse keyword searches, and geofence searches provide new ways for governments to gather information about individuals. As these new technologies develop, the Fourth Amendment has struggled to advance alongside this new technology.

Thankfully, the Fourth Amendment is not the only protection Americans have from government intrusion. Every single state has its own state constitution and analog to the Federal Fourth Amendment. In fact, some states had their own analog amendments even before the adoption of the Federal Fourth Amendment. While oftentimes the …

Country Roads, Take Me To Home Rule, Jesse J. Richardson Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.