Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
State and Local Government Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (257)
- Courts (102)
- Legislation (97)
- Property Law and Real Estate (89)
- Torts (80)
-
- Jurisdiction (75)
- Commercial Law (66)
- Fourteenth Amendment (61)
- Estates and Trusts (58)
- Criminal Law (57)
- Labor and Employment Law (55)
- Conflict of Laws (50)
- Contracts (49)
- Business Organizations Law (46)
- Supreme Court of the United States (46)
- Transportation Law (46)
- Common Law (45)
- Land Use Law (44)
- Election Law (40)
- Tax Law (40)
- Legal History (39)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (38)
- Bankruptcy Law (37)
- Civil Procedure (37)
- Insurance Law (37)
- Evidence (35)
- Banking and Finance Law (34)
- Administrative Law (33)
- Keyword
-
- Michigan (83)
- Due process (35)
- New York (34)
- State courts (30)
- Illinois (29)
-
- California (27)
- Cities (27)
- Interstate commerce (24)
- Law reform (23)
- Federalism (22)
- Regulation (21)
- Ohio (20)
- Wisconsin (19)
- Equal protection (18)
- Liability (18)
- Police powers (18)
- Judicial review (17)
- Municipalities (17)
- Zoning (17)
- Fraud (16)
- Negligence (15)
- Public interest (15)
- United States Supreme Court (14)
- Iowa (13)
- Minnesota (13)
- Pennsylvania (13)
- Police power (13)
- History (12)
- Indiana (12)
- Constitution (11)
- Publication Year
Articles 511 - 540 of 947
Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law
Unreported Michigan Supreme Court Opinions, 1836-1843, Clark F. Norton
Unreported Michigan Supreme Court Opinions, 1836-1843, Clark F. Norton
Michigan Law Review
It is a commonly known fact that, although Michigan was admitted to the Union in 1837 (many of her citizens had claimed statehood for more than a year prior to her formal admission), few opinions of the state supreme court written before 1843 have ever been published. Why a period of almost ten years should have elapsed before the first volume of state reports was issued in 1846 ( with the exception of two volumes of chancery reports), or why the early reporters seem, from a casual examination, to have neglected decisions of the court before 1843, or what happened …
Constitutional Law - Due Process Limitations On Statutes Regulating Extrastate Contracts, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Due Process Limitations On Statutes Regulating Extrastate Contracts, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, reciprocal insurance associations which insure against fire and related risks, and whose attorneys-in-fact are located in Illinois, brought a declaratory judgment action in New York state courts for a determination of the applicability to them of the New York law requiring that such co-operative insurance associations obtain a license, or be prohibited from doing "any act which effects, aids or promotes the doing of an insurance business" in New York. As a condition of the license, submission to the New York regulations is required. The activities of the associations within the state of New York include investigation by engineers …
The Bones Of Haddock V. Haddock, Harold Wright Holt
The Bones Of Haddock V. Haddock, Harold Wright Holt
Michigan Law Review
It would not be fitting to say in the language of the stage that Williams v. North Carolina has drawn the curtain on Haddock v. Haddock. Rather we will shift the metaphor to say that the recent case from North Carolina has largely stripped the flesh from the earlier decision. Yet the bones of Haddock v. Haddock remain unbleached and unpulverized. Just as persons with mechanical turn of mind may frame from blocks of wood puzzles of readjustment and resetting, so courts in states that do not favor free and easy termination of marriage may still find in the …
Executors And Administrators-Right Of Creditors Of A Decedent To Recover From Distributees After The Estate Is Closed
Michigan Law Review
A recent California decision suggests a problem of some difficulty in the administration of decedents' estates. In Dabney V. Dabney, it appeared that a decedent had, in his lifetime, contracted to pay the plaintiff $100 and $350 respectively, monthly, as long as plaintiff should live, according to the terms of two contracts. In distributing the estate the court, as provided in the California Probate Code, had set aside a sum of money for the purpose of paying these monthly installments. The estate was then distributed, defendant herein being the principal distributee. On February 17, 1941, there remained only $216 …
Deeds - Effect Of Noncompliance With Statute Requiring Grantor To Set Forth In Deed Name Under Which He Derived Title, Mary Jane Morris
Deeds - Effect Of Noncompliance With Statute Requiring Grantor To Set Forth In Deed Name Under Which He Derived Title, Mary Jane Morris
Michigan Law Review
In a suit between plaintiff and defendant Girola Bros., plaintiff obtained a judgment and levied upon certain property. Plaintiff purchased the land at an execution sale and recorded the sheriff's deed conveying the property to him. Prior to the commencement of the action, defendant Girola Bros. had changed its name to Madalay, Inc., and under the latter name had conveyed the property, subsequently levied on by plaintiff, to defendant M. Girola, pending the action by plaintiff. This deed was recorded. It set forth Madalay, Inc., as grantor, but failed to set forth the name in which Madalay, Inc., derived title …
Corporations - Foreign Corporations - Effect Of Complying With Domestication Statute, E. George Rudolph
Corporations - Foreign Corporations - Effect Of Complying With Domestication Statute, E. George Rudolph
Michigan Law Review
Decedent was a resident of Nebraska and all his property was located there. By his will he left the residue of his estate to a number of charitable institutions including the Topeka Branch of the Women's Foreign Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church, a corporation incorporated in Kansas. The Topeka Branch claimed exemption from the Nebraska inheritance tax because it was a domestic charitable corporation, having complied with the Nebraska statute providing, "Any corporation organized under the laws of any other state . . . which has filed . . . with the secretary of state of this state, …
Commissioner Benjamin's Report On Administrative Adjudication In New York, Gilbert H. Montague
Commissioner Benjamin's Report On Administrative Adjudication In New York, Gilbert H. Montague
Michigan Law Review
In his annual message to the New York Legislature in January, 1939, after recalling that at the 1938 election the people had rejected a proposal that would "freeze into the Constitution a rigid procedure" for "the judicial review of the facts as well as of the law of virtually all decisions of administrative officers and agencies," Governor Lehman announced: "Modification of procedure, if needed, should be undertaken only after careful study of each administrative process on an individual basis. As part of my plan always to improve and perfect the administrative branch of government, intend to appoint a commissioner under …
Conflict Of Laws Relating To Installment Sales, Robert E. Lee
Conflict Of Laws Relating To Installment Sales, Robert E. Lee
Michigan Law Review
The most perplexing problem in the field of installment contracts probably occurs when property sold by a title-retaining instrument (conditional sale, chattel mortgage, or bailment lease) in one state is removed to another state where rights of creditors of, or purchasers from, the buyer attach. Inasmuch as the possession of the article has been permitted to be in the buyer, so that outwardly, and with nothing more, he is the apparent owner, the important question arises as to whose rights are higher, the secret owner (the conditional seller, the chattel mortgagee, or the bailor) or the creditor of, or purchaser …
Powers - Rights Of Donees' Creditors Against Property Subject Thereto When The Power Is General And Is Exercised By Will, Charles Wright, Ill
Powers - Rights Of Donees' Creditors Against Property Subject Thereto When The Power Is General And Is Exercised By Will, Charles Wright, Ill
Michigan Law Review
In general it is said that the majority of jurisdictions in the United States allow creditors of the donee of a general power of appointment, exercisable by deed or will, or by will only, to reach the appointive property when the power is exercised by will, if the donee's personal estate is insolvent and if the appointment is to a volunteer. It would appear from a survey of the authorities dealing with the question that only twenty states have spoken on the subject at all. Of that number only sixteen have decisions which can, by any stretch of the imagination, …
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Regulation Of Renovated Butter Manufacture, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Regulation Of Renovated Butter Manufacture, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, who was engaged in the manufacture of renovated butter from packing stock butter, brought an action to enjoin Alabama officials from enforcing state laws relating to the inspection and seizure of the raw material. Plaintiff contended that since the production of renovated butter was taxed and regulated by the United States, state action was excluded. The federal act conferred upon the Secretary of Agriculture, among other things the duty of ascertaining "whether or not materials used in the manufacture of said process or renovated butter are deleterious to health or unwholesome in the finished product, and in case such …
Municipal Corporations - Waters And Watercourses - Eminent Domain - Pollution Of Water As A "Taking" Of Private Property, Brooks F. Crabtree
Municipal Corporations - Waters And Watercourses - Eminent Domain - Pollution Of Water As A "Taking" Of Private Property, Brooks F. Crabtree
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued defendant city for damages caused his land by the continual discharge of raw sewage into the river about one-half mile above plaintiff's land. The pollution rendered the water of the river unfit for domestic use and deleterious to health. Held, that although the plaintiff failed to allege the necessary elements for a tort action against a municipality, under the Washington statute, he stated a valid cause of action for damages under article I, section 16 of the Washington Constitution which states that "No private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just …
Constitutional Law - State Proration Acts - Regulation Of Production When Sales Are Largely Interstate, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - State Proration Acts - Regulation Of Production When Sales Are Largely Interstate, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, a raisin packer in the state of California, was prevented from purchasing in open market to fill his out-of-state orders because of the California Agricultural Proration Act. By its provisions the producers of raisin grapes are required to turn over seventy per cent of their produce to state "pools." The remaining thirty per cent may be sold without restriction, providing the producer holds certificates issued by a commission. Packers are permitted to purchase only from such certificate holders. These packers operate within California, buying from producers and selling to jobbers, wholesalers, brokers, etc., for resale to the public. …
Municipal Corporations - Zoning Ordinances - Aesthetic Considerations Under The Police Power, Charles J. O' Laughlin
Municipal Corporations - Zoning Ordinances - Aesthetic Considerations Under The Police Power, Charles J. O' Laughlin
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the enforcement of the zoning laws of the city of Miami Beach. His property was in a zone reserved for apartment hotels and first-class family residences, but adjacent to an area in which business structures were allowed. Plaintiff sought to erect structures of a business character on his property, despite the zoning law. Held, the zoning law is sustained, for plaintiff's property rights must yield to the interest of the community in maintaining the attractiveness of this resort area. City of Miami Beach v. Ocean & Inland Co., (Fla. 1941) 3 So. (2d) …
Labor Law - Unemployment Compensation - Effect Of Voluntary Quitting, Louis C. Andrews
Labor Law - Unemployment Compensation - Effect Of Voluntary Quitting, Louis C. Andrews
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff voluntarily quit working for defendant November 7, 1939, to take another job which he reasonably expected to be permanent, but which ended in seven weeks because of a slack in business. He applied for benefits accrued under the Iowa Unemployment Compensation Act during his employment with defendant, to which he was entitled unless disqualified by reason of his voluntary quitting. Defendant employer opposed the claim to prevent charging of benefit payments against his fund. The experience rating features of the Iowa act provide that the smaller the depletion in an employer's fund, the lower his future compensation tax. Held …
Congressional Enactment Of Uniform Judicial Notice Act, Lawrence E. Hartwig
Congressional Enactment Of Uniform Judicial Notice Act, Lawrence E. Hartwig
Michigan Law Review
The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform Laws approved in 1936 the Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act, which has since been adopted by fourteen states. This act was drafted to make uniform a legislative movement of the past twelve years proposing to change two rules of the common law. One is the rule that a state court will not notice the law of sister states in the United States; and the other is the rule that the determination of such law shall be made by the jury and not by the judge. Accordingly, the Uniform Act provides (1) …
Admiralty - Uniformity Rule, William C. Whitehead
Admiralty - Uniformity Rule, William C. Whitehead
Michigan Law Review
From the words of the Federal Constitution the federal courts have spelled out the rule that maritime matters shall be governed by a uniform set of laws. These laws consist of the general maritime law at the adoption of the Constitution plus regulations subsequently promulgated by Congress. The decisions which have outlined the "uniformity rule" have concerned themselves with admiralty's interrelationship with interstate commerce. A recent application of the rule suggests another problem which uniformity is designed to circumvent--the difficulty of enforcing local rules against subjects on navigable waters. The federal courts have not always been precise in their application …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Price Regulation - Prohibition Of Sales Below Cost, George W. Loomis
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Price Regulation - Prohibition Of Sales Below Cost, George W. Loomis
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was indicted for alleged violation of the Pennsylvania Fair Sales Act, which prohibits the "advertisement, offer for sale, or sale of any merchandise at less than cost by retailers or wholesalers," and makes violation of the act a misdemeanor. His motion to quash the indictment was sustained by the court of the quarter sessions and affirmed by the superior court, and the state appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Held, affirming, that the statute violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment since it is not within the power of the state to prohibit sales below cost …
Federal Courts - Review Of State Courts Decision Involving Federal And Nonfederal Ouestions, John C. Johnston
Federal Courts - Review Of State Courts Decision Involving Federal And Nonfederal Ouestions, John C. Johnston
Michigan Law Review
In exercising appellate jurisdiction over federal questions raised in the highest court of a state, the Supreme Court of the United States has refused to adopt the view that the existence of a federal question in the record or decision of the state court will empower it to decide every other question that is raised in the case. Correlated to this refusal to review the nonfederal question is the further self-imposed limitation that where the decision of the state court rests upon a nonfederal ground sufficient in itself to support the judgment of the state court, the Supreme Court will …
The Supreme Court, The Commerce Clause, And State Legislation, Vincent M. Barnett, Jr.
The Supreme Court, The Commerce Clause, And State Legislation, Vincent M. Barnett, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Recent decisions have revealed a growing rift in the Supreme Court on the question of the effect of the commerce clause on state legislation. This question, a perennial one in our constitutional history, concerns state legislation affecting in some way or other the carrying on of interstate business, and the validity of that legislation in view of the clause giving Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce. The permissible scope of state activity in the absence of Congressional action has been the troublesome problem. If Congress acts, the issue is a relatively simple one. When the state action conflicts with …
Conflict Of Laws - Workmen's Compensation - Local Statute As A Defense To A Local Cause Of Action, John C. Johnston
Conflict Of Laws - Workmen's Compensation - Local Statute As A Defense To A Local Cause Of Action, John C. Johnston
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff resided and was employed in Texas as the manager of a local store owned by a corporation which operated a chain of stores in various states. While visiting the main office of his employer in Illinois, he was injured through the negligence of the defendant taxicab company. After applying for and receiving compensation from his employer under the Workmen's Compensation Law of Texas, plaintiff then brought action in Illinois against defendant to recover damages for his personal injuries. Under the Workmen's Compensation Act of Texas an employee who has received compensation under the act may bring an action against …
Federal Courts - Conflict Between The Federal Declaratory Judgments Act And The Johnson Act, Spencer E. Irons
Federal Courts - Conflict Between The Federal Declaratory Judgments Act And The Johnson Act, Spencer E. Irons
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff gas company contracted with defendant city to furnish gas from a certain field at rates fixed by ordinance. Plaintiff reserved the right, when this field became insufficient, to furnish gas from other fields at rates to be adjusted in accordance with the increased cost. In a suit in the federal district court for a declaratory judgment, plaintiff sought a determination that the local field had become insufficient, and that it was necessary to furnish gas from other fields. Plaintiff alleged that defendant city refused to recognize the changed conditions and insisted that plaintiff continue to furnish gas at the …
Municipal Corporations - Tort Liability - Exemplary Damages, Michigan Law Review
Municipal Corporations - Tort Liability - Exemplary Damages, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was injured in a collision between the car in which she was riding and a negligently driven fire truck owned by the defendant municipality. Plaintiff's declaration alleged that the fire trucks had been habitually driven in a grossly negligent manner, but the evidence offered at the trial did not substantiate this allegation. The trial court instructed the jury that it could include in the verdict such sum as might be warranted by the evidence as punitive or exemplary damages. The jury awarded $5,000 damages. Held, that plaintiff could recover for torts committed by the fire department, and that …
Municipal Corporations - Bonds Redeemable At Option Of Municipality- Notice To Bondholders Necessary To Stop Running Of Interest, Michigan Law Review
Municipal Corporations - Bonds Redeemable At Option Of Municipality- Notice To Bondholders Necessary To Stop Running Of Interest, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Defendant municipality issued bonds redeemable before maturity at defendant's option. There was no provision for registration, and neither the statute nor the bonds provided for notice of redemption. In May,1938, notice was published in newspapers of general circulation that the bonds were to be redeemed on June 1. Plaintiff, owner of the entire issue, did not know of the redemption until September 27. It sued for interest from June 1 to September 27. Held, notice by publication is sufficient to stop the running of interest, and plaintiff is therefore not entitled to recover. Philadelphia Savings Fund Society v. City …
Certiorari - Review Of Governor's Dismissal Proceeding, Kenneth J. Nordstrom
Certiorari - Review Of Governor's Dismissal Proceeding, Kenneth J. Nordstrom
Michigan Law Review
Proceedings were instituted against the directors of a California prison on charges of misconduct, incompetency, and neglect of duty, which resulted in their removal from office by the governor. A constitutional provision authorized the governor to appoint such directors, who were to hold, office for ten years, and provided that the governor should have the power to remove the directors for misconduct, incompetency, or neglect after an opportunity to be heard upon written charges. Due notice and a complete hearing were accorded to the directors as required. Plaintiff directors seek review of the removal proceedings by writ of certiorari. Held …
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Labor Law - Power Of State To Enjoin Unfair Labor Practices Of Employees In Industries Engaged In Interstate Commerce, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Labor Law - Power Of State To Enjoin Unfair Labor Practices Of Employees In Industries Engaged In Interstate Commerce, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair labor practices as defined by the Wisconsin Employment Relations Act. Plaintiff-appellee issued a cease and desist order, which was sustained by the lower court despite defendant's contention that the statute was unconstitutional on the ground that Congress had precluded such state legislation affecting interstate industries by enacting the National Labor Relations Act. Held, plaintiff's order sustained. State legislation not repugnant to the Wagner Act is operative in this field so long as the National Labor Relations Board has not acted in the …
Statutes - Unincorporated Association As A "Person" Under The Liquor And Sales Acts, Felicia I. Hmiel
Statutes - Unincorporated Association As A "Person" Under The Liquor And Sales Acts, Felicia I. Hmiel
Michigan Law Review
In 1939 the International Workers Order, an unincorporated association, had a picnic and dispensed beer through its secretary to its members without charge. The association had not obtained a license to sell beer. The secretary, defendant herein, was arrested and tried for violation of the Liquor Control Act, which made it a misdemeanor for a person to sell liquor without a license. Held, that an unincorporated association is not a person within the meaning of the statute, and therefore there was no sale. People v. Budzan, 295 Mich. 547, 295 N. W. 259 (1940).
Bankruptcy - Rights Of Trustee As Against Mortgagee Under Mortgage Containing After-Acquired Property Clause, Charles D. Johnson
Bankruptcy - Rights Of Trustee As Against Mortgagee Under Mortgage Containing After-Acquired Property Clause, Charles D. Johnson
Michigan Law Review
A mortgage, containing an after-acquired property clause which described specifically many kinds of property which should pass under it when acquired, was given to bondholders as part of a refunding mortgage. Several mortgages were subsequently executed to the mortgagees covering some of the after-acquired property. After the intervention of bankruptcy a dispute arose between the mortgagees and the trustee over the right to possession of certain property not covered by the later mortgages and in the possession of the bankrupt at the time of the adjudication. Held, under section 47a(2) of the Bankruptcy Act, the trustee takes the property …
Taxation - Tax Delinquent Lands - The Michigan Land Board Act As A Solution To The Delinquency Problem, Rex B. Martin
Taxation - Tax Delinquent Lands - The Michigan Land Board Act As A Solution To The Delinquency Problem, Rex B. Martin
Michigan Law Review
Nearly all states have been faced with the increasingly difficult problem of what to do with the growing volume of tax delinquent land which has been thrown upon their hands. As a typical example of the financial aspects of this problem, Michigan in 1928 had over $25,000,000 worth of delinquent taxes on 8,757,000 acres of property. In 1932 this acreage was estimated at 15,660,000. By 1937 the unpaid taxes in some of Michigan's counties exceeded five times the assessed value of the delinquent properties. Much of the property could not be sold for the amount of taxes owed, and the …
Federal Courts - Decisions Of State Intermediate Courts As State Law To Be Applied By Federal Courts, Spencer E. Irons
Federal Courts - Decisions Of State Intermediate Courts As State Law To Be Applied By Federal Courts, Spencer E. Irons
Michigan Law Review
The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a federal district court in Ohio was not bound by a decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals to the effect that in a case of wrongful transfer of shares of stock, a demand and refusal was necessary to start the statute of limitations running. On certiorari, held, that, in ascertaining what the state law is, lower state court decisions are data which are not to be disregarded by a federal court, unless it is convinced by other persuasive data that the highest court of the state …
Husband And Wife-Wife's Right To Recover For Loss Of "Consortium" Due To Injury To Husband From Wrongful Sale Of Liquor, William C. Whitehead
Husband And Wife-Wife's Right To Recover For Loss Of "Consortium" Due To Injury To Husband From Wrongful Sale Of Liquor, William C. Whitehead
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued for loss of her right of consortium occasioned by the illness and death of her husband as a result of a sale of liquor by defendant in violation of a state statute. Defendant demurred on the ground that there was no cause of action granted by the statute for damages flowing from such an illegal sale. Held, an action for injury to the wife's right of consortium was available at common law. Swanson v. Ball, (S. D. 1940) 290 N. W. 482.