State and Local Government Law Commons^™

A History Of The Public Lands Debate, Patricia Nelson Limerick

Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)

22 pages.

Why We’Re Unhappy? [Synopsis], Louise Liston

Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)

2 pages.

Agenda: Challenging Federal Ownership And Management: Public Lands And Public Benefits, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)

Conference organizers, speakers and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Michael A. Gheleta, Teresa Rice, Elizabeth Ann (Betsy) Rieke and Charles F. Wilkinson.

In the face of numerous proposals for privatizing, marketing, and changing the management of public lands, the Natural Resources Law Center will hold its third annual fall public lands conference October 11-13, at the CU School of Law in Boulder.

A panel of public land users and neighbors, including timber, grazing, mining, recreation, and environmental interests, will address current discontent with public land policy and management. There will also be discussion …

Public Land Policy Is Ripe For Change, James L. Huffman

Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)

18 pages.

Office Of The Legislative Analyst, B. Vahle

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

General Legislation, E. D'Angelo Weichel, S. Barrow

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Office Of The Legislative Analyst, E. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

General Legislation, E. D'Angelo, S. Barrow

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

The Power Of Contempt And Child Support Issues For Family Lawyers, Oregon Law Institute, Bette G. Yada, Diane Pietrzak, Deborah Wilson, John A. Ellis, Elizabeth Welch, Gregory B. Soriano, Mark A. Johnson

Oregon Law Institute, 1995

Course Materials from the June 2, 1995 Program in Portland

Health Care Confidentiality: Current Virginia Law And A Proposal For Legislation, Paul A. Lombardo

Faculty Publications By Year

No abstract provided.

Direct Democracy And Bioethical Choices: Voting Life And Death At The Ballot Box, Judith F. Daar

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Direct democracy, the political process that enables citizens to draft, circulate, and enact laws, has become the refuge for grassroots organizations seeking statutory validation in a legislative arena perceived to be unresponsive or unfriendly to their concerns. One group of citizens, advocates for physician-aid-in-dying, has recently emerged on the national scene, sponsoring state ballot initiatives in three states and pledging to continue their quest for legalization of physician-assisted death throughout the country. In this Article, Professor Daar examines the interplay between direct democracy and regulation of end-of-life decision making. This examination reveals that lawmaking by initiative, as seen through the …

Electronic Mail And Michigan's Public Disclosure Laws: The Argument For Public Access To Governmental Electronic Mail, Daniel F. Hunter

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Note explores the potential for citizens to request electronic mail (e-mail) records from government agencies using public disclosure laws, with emphasis on the Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). E-mail is a medium that has come to replace both telephone calls and paper documents for many purposes. The applicability of public disclosure laws to e-mail, however, is less than clear. Telephone conversations by public employees for most purposes are confidential, while paper records created by those same employees can be requested under the FOIA. Thus, should public e-mail remain private and confidential or should it be subject to FOIA …

The Indiana Environmental Policy Act: Casting A New Role For A Forgotten Statute, Jeffrey L. Carmichael

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Doctors, Aids, And Confidentiality In The 1990s, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 331 (1994), Sheila Taub

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rock-A-Bye Lawsuit: Can A Baby Sue The Hand That Rocked The Cradle, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 429 (1995), Geoffrey A. Vance

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pulling The Plug: Controversial Programming On Public Access Television And The Cable Television Consumer Protection And Competition Act Of 1992, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 399 (1995), Bradley J. Howard

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Preemptive Effect Of Erisa On The Prevailing Wage Act, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 55 (1995), Scott D. Miller

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Minutemen, The National Guard And The Private Militia Movement: Will The Real Militia Please Stand Up, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 959 (1995), Chuck Dougherty

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Handling Difficult Issues Under The Family Medical Leave Act, Helen Norton

Publications

No abstract provided.

Legislative Powers

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judging Girls: Decision Making In Parental Consent To Abortion Cases, Suellyn Scarnecchia, Julie Kunce Field

Articles

Judges make determinations on a daily basis that profoundly affect people's lives. On March 28, 1991, the Michigan legislature enacted a statute entitled The Parental Rights Restoration Act (hereinafter "the Michigan Act" or "the Act"). This statute delegated to probate court judges the extraordinary task of deciding whether a minor girl may have an abortion without the consent of a parent. Nothing in law school and little in an average judge's experience provide a meaningful framework for making such a decision. Although many commentators, including the authors, argue that decisions about abortion should be left to the woman regardless of …

Structuring The Ballot Initiative: Procedures That Do And Don't Work, Richard B. Collins, Dale Oesterle

Publications

No abstract provided.

Office Of The Legislative Analyst, E. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

General Legislation, E. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Office Of The Legislative Analyst, E. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Assembly Office Of Research, S. Cola

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

General Legislation, E. D'Angelo, S. Barrow

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Office Of The Legislative Analyst, A. Rovell, E. D'Angelo, J. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Assembly Office Of Research, G. Weisman

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

General Legislation, S. Barrow, E. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.