State and Local Government Law Commons^™

Article I Of The Texas Rules Of Evidence And Articles I And Xi Of The Texas Rules Of Criminal Evidence: Applicability Of The Rules, Procedural Matters, And Preserving Error., Olin Guy Wellborn Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Bankruptcy Code Does Not Require Periodic Postpetition Payments To Undersecured Creditors For Interest On Value Of Collateral As Compensation For Delay Of Chapter 11 Reorganization Proceedings During Pendency Of Automatic Stay., Robert J. Ogle

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Texas Statutory Notice Of Lis Pendens: A Deprivation Of Property Interest Without Due Process Comment., Herbert A. Janzen

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Family Law - Overview Of Significant 1987 Legislation Passed In The 70th Session Of The Texas Legislature Recent Development., Patricia A. Foster

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Interstate Banking And Branch Banking In Texas: An Overview Of The Constitutional And Statutory Provisions., Kimberly Cauthorn

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Judicial Notice Under Article Ii Of The Texas Rules Of Evidence., Olin Guy Wellborn Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Procedural Rights And Remedies Under The Texas Property Tax Code - A Guide To The Code, Recent Amendments, And Developing Case Law., Farley P. Katz, Charles J. Muller Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

The Good Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule: The New Federalism And A Texas Proposal., Valerie L. Eiben

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Voting For Death: Lingering Doubts About The Constitutionality Of Texas' Capital Sentencing Procedure., Robert J. Clary

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Civil Rights - Title Vii - Public Employer May Consider Gender To Promote Employee Without Violating Title Vii Of Civil Rights Act Of 1964 When Enforcing A Valid Affirmative Action Plan Case Note., Marianne Malouf

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Board Of Dental Examiners, E. Beazley

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Examiners Of Nursing Home Administrators, L. Mcdonell

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Optometry, T. Donch

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Pharmacy, T. Donch

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Registered Nursing, K. Turnbull

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, J. Barnes

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, J. Ramirez-Cardenas

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Chiropractic Examiners, J. Ramirez-Cardenas

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Osteopathic Examiners, R. Bargetto

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Aids: Testing Democracy - Irrational Responses To The Public Health Crisis And The Need For Privacy In Serologic Testing, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 835 (1986), Michael L. Closen, Susan Marie Connor, Howard L. Kaufman, Mark E. Wojcik

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Protecting The Record For Appeal: A Reference Guide In Texas Civil Cases., David E. Keltner, Melinda R. Burke

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Take-Or-Pay Provisions: Major Problems For The Natural Gas Industry Comment., David L. Roland

St. Mary's Law Journal

A prompt solution to the take-or-pay problem is vital to the survival of the natural gas industry. Due to the increasingly turbulent and unpredictable natural gas market, most natural gas producers include a take-or-pay provision in their gas purchase contracts. Take-or-pay provisions require a pipeline company to either take an amount of natural gas from the producer or the company must pay for the specified amount. The market, however, has changed and the demand for natural gas declined. The demand can be partly attributed to the energy crisis of a decade ago. As a result of the crisis, consumers are …

The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act And Refusal Of Treatment In Missouri, Sandra H. Johnson

All Faculty Scholarship

Missouri’s Death-Prolonging Procedures Act of 1985 represents an effort to ensure that an individual’s choices regarding medical treatment will be honored, even if the individual becomes incompetent. This article considers the Act’s limiting structure and examines the effect of these limits on the effectiveness of the Act in providing a legal right to refuse medical treatment.

Following an introduction, Part II describes the limiting structure of the Act. Part III considers the way in which the Act’s limitations relate to its binding effect.

First, an individual’s declaration applies only to "death-prolonging procedures" and only if the individual is terminally ill. …

The Best Evidence Article Of The Texas Rules Of Evidence., Olin Guy Wellborn Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Reversal Due To Fundamental Error In The Jury Charge Requires A Showing Of Egregious Harm To The Accused If The Error Is Not Objected To At Trial., Michael H. Bassett

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

An Employer's Intentional Failure To Maintain A Safe Work Place Is Not An Intentional Act Unless The Employer Is Substantially Certain That Such Conduct Would Cause The Injury., David S. Goldberg

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Hospital Liability May Be Based On Either Doctrine Of Ostensible Agency Or Doctrine Of Corporate Negligence., Gregory T. Perkes

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Foreword., Editorial Board St. Mary's Law Journal

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Cancellation Of Water Rights In Texas: Use It Or Lose It., R. Lambeth Townsend

St. Mary's Law Journal

It is the constitutional duty of the State of Texas to conserve and develop the state’s water resources. Texas effectuates water conservation and utilization through its system of granting and administering rights for the beneficial use of the state’s water. The Supreme Court of Texas concluded the state can further conserve water by cancelling appropriations not beneficially used to the limit provided in the permit, certified filing, or certificate of adjudication. Cancellation of unused water rights enables the Water Commission to make water available for beneficial use by others. Only by the beneficial use of water can the state obtain …

The Continuing Voids In Texas Groundwater Law: Are Concepts And Terminology To Blame., Corwin W. Johnson

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.