Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
State and Local Government Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (846)
- University of San Diego (352)
- Seattle University School of Law (194)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (52)
-
- University of Richmond (52)
- University of Michigan Law School (34)
- Cleveland State University (31)
- Georgia State University College of Law (21)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (15)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (11)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (7)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (7)
- BLR (5)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Pace University (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (78)
- SB 664 (50)
- Student comment (46)
-
- Texas (46)
- Texas Supreme Court (37)
- AB 1807 (34)
- COVID-19 (25)
- Federalism (25)
- Fourteenth Amendment (25)
- Health care (25)
- Due process (21)
- Regulation (21)
- AB 819 (20)
- Due Process Clause (20)
- First Amendment (20)
- Negligence (20)
- Jr. (19)
- SB 2036 (19)
- Texas Constitution (19)
- Constitutional law (18)
- Equal Protection Clause (18)
- Abortion (17)
- Criminal law (17)
- Healthcare (17)
- Liability (17)
- Law (16)
- Legal malpractice (16)
- Legislation (16)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (843)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (352)
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (49)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (22)
- Journal of Law and Health (19)
- Georgia State University Law Review (17)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (13)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (13)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
- Articles (10)
- Michigan Law Review (10)
- Cleveland State Law Review (8)
- Indiana Law Journal (8)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (7)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (6)
- William Mitchell Law Review (6)
- ExpressO (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (4)
- Faculty Publications By Year (4)
- Law Student Publications (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 1939
Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law
Self-Publication: Defamation Within The Employment Context., Howard J. Siegel
Self-Publication: Defamation Within The Employment Context., Howard J. Siegel
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article reviews the rules and reasoning various jurisdictions have maintained in defamation actions supported by self-publication. This type of defamation action is commonly known as self-defamation. Before the law will hold the originator of a defamatory statement liable for defamation, publication of the defamatory comments must occur. Generally, defamatory communications are those communications which tend to injure one’s reputation. Publication normally occurs when one communicates the defamatory matter to “one other than the person defamed.” Originally, courts considered defamation actions valid only when the defamed person alleged that the originator directly published the statement to a third person. Under …
Time Limitations For Objecting To Claims: The Interplay Between Sections 502(D) And 546(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code., Gregory G. Hesse
Time Limitations For Objecting To Claims: The Interplay Between Sections 502(D) And 546(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code., Gregory G. Hesse
St. Mary's Law Journal
It is common lore among bankruptcy trustees and lawyers that a bankruptcy trustee has an unlimited time period under the Bankruptcy Code (the Code) to file objections to claims. Neither Section 502(a) of the Code nor Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3007 contains time limitations within which an objection to a claim must be filed. Yet, creative creditor attorneys have fashioned arguments that the two-year limitations period placed on avoidance actions by Section 546(a) of the Code applies to claim objection proceedings brought under Section 502(d). Because courts have held the limitations period of Section 546(a) applies to claim objection …
U.S. Taxation Of U.S. Persons Doing Business Or Investing In Mexico: An Overview., William H. Hornberger
U.S. Taxation Of U.S. Persons Doing Business Or Investing In Mexico: An Overview., William H. Hornberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
U.S. persons who plan to do business in Mexico or invest in new or existing Mexican business ventures are faced with a myriad of U.S. federal income tax issues. U.S. counsel advising U.S. persons regarding the ownership structure for a contemplated business or investment in Mexico should have a basic understanding of the U.S. system of international taxation. While a working knowledge of Mexico’s tax system is also helpful, Mexican counsel can provide information regarding the Mexican tax implications of doing business or investing in Mexico. A review of the U.S. system of international taxation should begin with a consideration …
Banning Motherhood: An Rx To Combat Child Abuse., Toni Driver Saunders
Banning Motherhood: An Rx To Combat Child Abuse., Toni Driver Saunders
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Enhanced Punishment Under The Texas Hate Crimes Act: Politics, Panacea, Or Pathway To Hell., David Todd Smith
Enhanced Punishment Under The Texas Hate Crimes Act: Politics, Panacea, Or Pathway To Hell., David Todd Smith
St. Mary's Law Journal
Nearly without exception, modern legislatures have responded to the reprehensible nature and detrimental social effects of hate crime by enacting laws specifically designed to punish the offender’s discriminatory animus. The term “hate crime” describes criminal conduct which is motivated by the offender’s bias or prejudice against another cognizable group. Although the reprehensible nature of a hate crime is often apparent from the facts of any given case, the repercussions of these offenses exceed the ignoble character of any one specific act. Texas has now joined the ranks of these jurisdictions by adopting legal provisions which authorize heightened penalties upon a …
Legislative Redistricting In 1991-1992: The Texas Bill Of Rights V. The Voting Rights Act., James C. Harrington, Judith Sanders-Castro
Legislative Redistricting In 1991-1992: The Texas Bill Of Rights V. The Voting Rights Act., James C. Harrington, Judith Sanders-Castro
St. Mary's Law Journal
Every decade, after the federal government has taken the census, Americans endure the process of redistricting Congress, state legislatures, county commissioner precincts, school boards, city councils, and a host of other elected bodies. Governed by the interplay of federal, state, and local law, the reapportionment process would seem to be a relatively easy task in theory. Yet, overriding forces unique to the political arena and the judiciary’s voice in redistricting questions undermine the implementation of such a simple system. Narrow interpretation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by the United State Supreme Court and lower federal courts further intensify …
The Supreme Court Takes A Weapon From The Drug War Arsenal: New Defenses To Civil Drug Forfeiture., Scott Alexander Nelson
The Supreme Court Takes A Weapon From The Drug War Arsenal: New Defenses To Civil Drug Forfeiture., Scott Alexander Nelson
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Comment discusses the history and development of forfeiture law—emphasizing the misnomer of “guilty property”—and addresses the lack of constitutional safeguards in the civil forfeiture statutes. It outlines prospective constitutional defenses announced by the United States Supreme Court, emphasizing the Fifth Amendment guarantee of due process, the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause, and the “innocent owner” defense. The federal statute authorizing civil forfeiture, 21 U.S.C. § 881 (Forfeiture Statute), was initially enacted as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. The Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984 amended the statute to impose forfeiture on real property …
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Doherty
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Doherty
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Medical Board Of California, S. Anderson, R. Hidalgo, N. S. Vincent, J. D'Angelo
Medical Board Of California, S. Anderson, R. Hidalgo, N. S. Vincent, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Optometry, J. Barnes
Board Of Optometry, J. Barnes
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy, R. Lucas
Board Of Registered Nursing, P. Cooney
Board Of Registered Nursing, P. Cooney
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, M. Bontems
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, M. Bontems
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, S. Cola
Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, S. Cola
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, C. Purdy
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, C. Purdy
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Florida's Hospital Lien Laws, Meta Calder
Florida's Hospital Lien Laws, Meta Calder
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Board Of Pharmacy, R. Lucas
Medical Board Of California, S. Anderson, R. Hidalgo, N. S. Vincent, J. D'Angelo
Medical Board Of California, S. Anderson, R. Hidalgo, N. S. Vincent, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Doherty, J. D'Angelo
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Doherty, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Examiners Of Nursing Home Administrators, J. Eden
Board Of Examiners Of Nursing Home Administrators, J. Eden
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Optometry, J. Barnes, J. D'Angelo
Board Of Optometry, J. Barnes, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Registered Nursing, P. Cooney
Board Of Registered Nursing, P. Cooney
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, M. Bontems
Board Of Examiners In Veterinary Medicine, M. Bontems
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, S. Cola
Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, S. Cola
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Chiropractic Examiners, Y Simpson
Board Of Chiropractic Examiners, Y Simpson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, C. Purdy
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, C. Purdy
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, K. Jillson
Osteopathic Medical Board Of California, K. Jillson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Seeberg
Board Of Dental Examiners, J. Seeberg
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Bureau Of Electronic And Appliance Repair, K. Chambers
Bureau Of Electronic And Appliance Repair, K. Chambers
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Board Of Examiners Of Nursing Home Administrators, M. Amador
Board Of Examiners Of Nursing Home Administrators, M. Amador
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.