Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
State and Local Government Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (209)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (126)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (61)
- University of Michigan Law School (42)
-
- University of Richmond (36)
- St. Mary's University (29)
- University of Colorado Law School (29)
- University of Kentucky (26)
- Roger Williams University (21)
- Southern Methodist University (16)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (14)
- Pepperdine University (13)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (12)
- University of Baltimore Law (12)
- Georgia State University College of Law (11)
- University of Georgia School of Law (11)
- Florida State University College of Law (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (10)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- St. John's University School of Law (6)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- West Virginia University (6)
- BLR (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (77)
- Federal (72)
- Supreme Court (61)
- State (60)
- Defendant (55)
-
- New York (52)
- Criminal procedure (51)
- Court of Appeals (41)
- Criminal law (40)
- Evidence (40)
- Police (39)
- Appellate Division (34)
- Due process (34)
- § 6 (34)
- 1990) (32)
- Criminal (27)
- United states constitution (27)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (26)
- Court (24)
- Fourth Amendment (24)
- Jury (24)
- 1991) (22)
- N.Y. Const. Art. I (22)
- Trial (22)
- Fourth amendment (21)
- Law (19)
- Probable cause (19)
- Privacy (18)
- Sentencing (18)
- Sixth amendment (18)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (207)
- Touro Law Review (126)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (49)
- University of Richmond Law Review (32)
-
- Michigan Law Review (28)
- Publications (28)
- Kentucky Law Journal (24)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (18)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (17)
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- Articles (12)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (10)
- Georgia State University Law Review (10)
- University of Baltimore Law Forum (10)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (8)
- Deason Center Reports (7)
- Georgia Law Review (7)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- Florida State University Law Review (6)
- SMU Annual Texas Survey (6)
- West Virginia Law Review (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Northwestern University Law Review (5)
- UMKC Law Review (5)
- Arkansas Law Review (4)
- ExpressO (4)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 691 - 720 of 946
Full-Text Articles in State and Local Government Law
Available Post-Trial Relief After A State Criminal Conviction When Newly Discovered Evidence Establishes "Actual Innocence", Josephine Linker Hart, Guilford M. Dudley
Available Post-Trial Relief After A State Criminal Conviction When Newly Discovered Evidence Establishes "Actual Innocence", Josephine Linker Hart, Guilford M. Dudley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Victimless Crime: A Comparison Of Public Offense Ratings Of Misdemeanor Offenses And Virginia Sentencing Guidelines, Theresa M. Dutton
Victimless Crime: A Comparison Of Public Offense Ratings Of Misdemeanor Offenses And Virginia Sentencing Guidelines, Theresa M. Dutton
Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations
This study was designed to explore the hypothesized gap between what state guidelines on criminal sanctioning recommend for misdemeanor offenses, and what the public perceives· as just punishment for these offenses. The research also addresses the issue of victimless crime. In this regard it was additionally hypothesized that there exists a significant difference in public opinion towards sentencing those crimes that specifically do not have a victim, with those that do.
The design of this study is based on one conducted by Peter Rossi and Richard Berk (Rossi and Berk 1997). For this study, a sample of students attending college …
Breaking The Code Of Silence: Rediscovering "Custom" In Section 1983 Municipal Liability, Myriam E. Gilles
Breaking The Code Of Silence: Rediscovering "Custom" In Section 1983 Municipal Liability, Myriam E. Gilles
Articles
No abstract provided.
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: Allowing The Prosecution A "Second Bite At The Apple" In Non-Capital Sentencing: Monge V. California, Eva Maria Floyd
Criminal Procedure: Allowing The Prosecution A "Second Bite At The Apple" In Non-Capital Sentencing: Monge V. California, Eva Maria Floyd
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Practicing Medicine Without A License: Legislative Attempts To Mandate Chemical Castration For Repeat Sex Offenders, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 381 (1999), Lisa Keesling
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maintaining An Accusatorial System Of Justice: The States' Refusal To Follow The Supreme Court's Sanctioning Of Official Police Deception In Moran V. Burbine, John F. Terzano
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Ours is the accusatorial as opposed to the inquisitorial system. Such has been the characteristic of Anglo-American criminal justice since it freed itself from practices borrowed by the Star Chamber from the Continent whereby an accused was interrogated in secret for hours on end. Under our system society carries the burden of proving its charge against the accused not out of his own mouth. It must establish its case, not by interrogation of the accused even under judicial safeguards, but by evidence independently secured through skillful investigation.... Protracted, systematic and uncontrolled subjection of an accused to interrogation by the police …
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Gabriel
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: People V. Gabriel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Dutchess County: People V. Mcintosh
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Dutchess County: People V. Mcintosh
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Prosecution: A New Approach To The Problem Of Juvenile Delinquency In Illinois, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1351 (1998), Mary E. Spring
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Leslie
Right To Counsel, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Leslie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York Vs. "The Rest Of The Country": State Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Barry Latzer
New York Vs. "The Rest Of The Country": State Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Barry Latzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department: People V. Haishun
Double Jeopardy, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department: People V. Haishun
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Vasquez
Double Jeopardy, Court Of Appeals: People V. Vasquez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy, Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Judicial Department: People V. Steele
Double Jeopardy, Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Judicial Department: People V. Steele
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: People V. Julio Batiz
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: People V. Julio Batiz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Funches
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Funches
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Court Of Appeals: People V. Cohen
Right To Counsel, Court Of Appeals: People V. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Hichez
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Hichez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Counsel, Court Of Appeals: People V. Wilson
Right To Counsel, Court Of Appeals: People V. Wilson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Right To A Speedy Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Coplin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Turriago
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Turriago
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department: People V. Hall
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.