Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Gender (91)
- Constitutional Law (78)
- Law and Society (74)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (73)
- Family Law (73)
-
- Criminal Law (69)
- Health Law and Policy (67)
- Human Rights Law (67)
- Labor and Employment Law (64)
- Law and Politics (64)
- Legal History (64)
- Science and Technology Law (64)
- Juvenile Law (63)
- Legislation (63)
- Religion Law (63)
- Education Law (62)
- First Amendment (62)
- Privacy Law (62)
- Computer Law (61)
- Courts (61)
- Law and Philosophy (61)
- Law and Race (61)
- Medical Jurisprudence (61)
- State and Local Government Law (61)
- Banking and Finance Law (60)
- Business Organizations Law (60)
- Communications Law (60)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (60)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (58)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
-
- University of Louisville (4)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- American University in Cairo (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- California State University, San Bernardino (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Clemson University (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Harding University (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (5)
- Law (5)
- Public health (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
-
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- ESG (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Equal protection (3)
- Sec (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- 303 Creative v. Elenis (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Colonization (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional Rights (2)
- Corporate governance (2)
- Credit discrimination (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Gender (2)
- Gender bias (2)
- Gender identity (2)
- Governance (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Intersectionality (2)
- LGBT (2)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Advanced Issues in Criminal Law: Sex Offenses (4)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Mercer Law Review Symposium (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (3)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- FIU Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- 2024–2025 Flyers (1)
- All Theses (1)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Dispatches (1)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects (1)
- Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Harding Undergraduate Research Conference (1)
- Human Movement Studies & Special Education Faculty Publications (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Journal of Law and Policy (1)
- Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi (1)
- Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 124 of 124
Full-Text Articles in Sexuality and the Law
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Free To Be You But Not Me?, Leah Litman
Free To Be You But Not Me?, Leah Litman
Reviews
In Gendered Liberty, Prof. Laura Portuondo presents a doctrinal puzzle: While claims to individual liberty are in decline in some spaces, they are ascendant in others. As Portuondo describes things, constitutional law has become increasingly hostile to claims by people who seek to defy gendered stereotypes. That includes the women who, for whatever reason, do not want to become mothers when they are pregnant, as well as the women whose lives, health, or fertility would be in jeopardy if they became mothers. The Supreme Court overruled their claims to liberty in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Safe Sex In The Age Of Big Tech Feminism, Brenda Dvoskin, Thomas E. Kadri
Safe Sex In The Age Of Big Tech Feminism, Brenda Dvoskin, Thomas E. Kadri
Scholarship@WashULaw
Lawmakers and technology companies are regulating online sexuality in the name of feminism. Whereas libertarian ideals dominated early debates about internet governance, “safety” became a rallying cry to regulate online activity in the age of Big Tech. As these regulatory paradigms now clash once again, one trend remains: legislators across the political spectrum and companies around the world are devising interventions that purportedly keep people—and especially women—safe from the risks of online sexuality. Through law and technology, they are targeting everything from privacy invasions to unwanted messages to sexual deepfakes. We call this regulatory and ideological trend Big Tech feminism. …