Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (225)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (209)
- University of Michigan Law School (73)
- American University Washington College of Law (68)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (36)
-
- Columbia Law School (35)
- New York Law School (35)
- BLR (29)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (28)
- Roger Williams University (26)
- UIC School of Law (26)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- University of Rhode Island (24)
- Pace University (23)
- Georgetown University Law Center (22)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- Brooklyn Law School (19)
- St. Mary's University (14)
- Boston University School of Law (13)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- Florida State University College of Law (13)
- University of Colorado Law School (13)
- University of Richmond (12)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (11)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (9)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (9)
- St. John's University School of Law (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Gender (99)
- Women (82)
- Discrimination (78)
- Transgender (55)
- Equality (46)
-
- Sexuality and the Law (45)
- Feminism (43)
- Race (40)
- LGBT (37)
- Law (37)
- Rape (37)
- Sex discrimination (37)
- Sexual orientation (37)
- Prostitution (35)
- Same-sex marriage (35)
- Sexual harassment (35)
- Title VII (34)
- Sexuality (33)
- Sex (32)
- Gender and law (31)
- Gay (30)
- Abortion (29)
- Diversity (25)
- LGBTQ (24)
- Lesbian (24)
- Marriage (24)
- Marriage equality (22)
- Civil rights (21)
- Culture (21)
- Equity (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (193)
- Women's Annotated Legal Bibliography (122)
- Faculty Scholarship (78)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (56)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (36)
-
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (33)
- ExpressO (28)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (26)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (25)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (24)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (21)
- Fordham Law Review (19)
- Indiana Law Journal (19)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- All Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Articles (17)
- Articles & Chapters (17)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (16)
- UIC Law Review (16)
- Cardozo Law Review (15)
- Michigan Law Review (15)
- Other Publications (15)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (14)
- Faculty Publications (13)
- Publications (12)
- Scholarly Publications (12)
- Oklahoma Law Review (11)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (9)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (9)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (8)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 1344
Full-Text Articles in Sexuality and the Law
European Court Won’T Review Case Against Baker In Northern Ireland, Arthur S. Leonard
European Court Won’T Review Case Against Baker In Northern Ireland, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
The Plain Meaning Of Sex: A Note On Bostock V. Clayton County, 55 Uic L. Rev. 357 (2022), Christopher Dallas
The Plain Meaning Of Sex: A Note On Bostock V. Clayton County, 55 Uic L. Rev. 357 (2022), Christopher Dallas
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justifying The Margins: Granting Suspect Classification To Trans* Individuals In The U.S. Judicial System, 55 Uic L. Rev. 403 (2022), James Casey Edwards
Justifying The Margins: Granting Suspect Classification To Trans* Individuals In The U.S. Judicial System, 55 Uic L. Rev. 403 (2022), James Casey Edwards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Need Of Transition: Transgender Inmate Access To Gender Affirming Healthcare In Prison, 55 Uic L. Rev. 773 (2022), Erin Murphy Fete
In Need Of Transition: Transgender Inmate Access To Gender Affirming Healthcare In Prison, 55 Uic L. Rev. 773 (2022), Erin Murphy Fete
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Small Gestures And Unexpectedconsequences: Textualist Interpretationsof State Antidiscrimination Lawafter Bostock V. Clayton County, Anastasia E. Lacina
Small Gestures And Unexpectedconsequences: Textualist Interpretationsof State Antidiscrimination Lawafter Bostock V. Clayton County, Anastasia E. Lacina
Fordham Law Review
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. Clayton County expanded Title VII’s coverage of victims of sex discrimination in employment by interpreting the statute to also protect LGBTQ+ employees who were discriminated against because of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity. Although Bostock only applies precedentially to Title VII, the long and interwoven history of state antidiscrimination statutes shows that the ruling may reach beyond federal law. This Note examines state court cases that have considered whether to apply Bostock’s reasoning to the interpretation of state antidiscrimination statutes. Furthermore, this Note argues in favor of a path …
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article discusses the issue of whether a victim of caste discrimination based on untouchability can assert a claim of intentional employment discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981. This article contends that there are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is a form of religious discrimination under Title VII. The question of whether caste discrimination is a form of race or national origin discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981 depends upon how the courts apply these definitions to caste discrimination based on untouchability. There are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is recognized within the concept …
Bostock: An Inevitable Guarantee Of Heightened Scrutiny For Sexual Orientation And Transgender Classifications, Kaleb Byars
Bostock: An Inevitable Guarantee Of Heightened Scrutiny For Sexual Orientation And Transgender Classifications, Kaleb Byars
Articles
n June 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. Clayton County. In Bostock, the Court held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status per se constitutes discrimination "because of sex" for purposes of Title VIL But Bostock inspires the question of whether its holding and reasoning apply in other contexts, including the Equal Protection Clause context. While the Supreme Court has held intermediate scrutiny applies to sex classifications analyzed under the Equal Protection Clause, the Court has yet to elucidate the level of scrutiny that applies to LGBTQ classifications. Meanwhile, state and federal courts …
Trojan Zebra: Unmasking Bostock’S Potential To Undermine Lgbtq+ Protections, James E.A. Rehwaldt
Trojan Zebra: Unmasking Bostock’S Potential To Undermine Lgbtq+ Protections, James E.A. Rehwaldt
Lewis & Clark Law Review
Engaging with the methodological framework endorsed by the Supreme Court’s holding and rejected by the dissents in Bostock v. Clayton County, this Comment critically examines both the limited scope and potential misuses of the Court’s decision recognizing protection against employment discrimination for gay, lesbian, and transgender individuals under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Weaponizing Fear, Lisa S. Washington
Bostock And Contact Theory: How Will A Single U.S. Supreme Court Decision Reduce Prejudice Against Lgbtq People?, Mantas Grigorovicius
Bostock And Contact Theory: How Will A Single U.S. Supreme Court Decision Reduce Prejudice Against Lgbtq People?, Mantas Grigorovicius
Indiana Law Journal
In 1954, Gordon Allport, one of the nation’s leading social psychologists, laid out a hypothesis explaining how prejudice could be reduced by intergroup contact. Decades later, his hypothesis became a theory with thousands of research hours behind it. Under contact theory, one of the factors that facilitates a reduction in prejudice between two groups is support of authorities or law. This Comment focuses on Bostock v. Clayton County, a recent Supreme Court decision holding that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. Allport suggested that antidiscrimination laws help to “lead and guide the folkways,” and this Comment explores how …
Love Is Love: The Fundamental Right To Love, Marriage, And Obergefell V. Hodges, Reginald Oh
Love Is Love: The Fundamental Right To Love, Marriage, And Obergefell V. Hodges, Reginald Oh
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process fundamental rights doctrine is about love. It is, at least, based on a close reading of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, the case in which the Supreme Court held that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right of individual autonomy and dignity.
Part I of this Article discusses the concept of love. Part II examines Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell and argues that it expresses unconditional love for LGBT people in tone, language, and substance. Part III argues that, in Obergefell, Kennedy’s key reasons for concluding that marriage is …
Gendered Normativities: The Role And Rule Of Law, Susanne Baer
Gendered Normativities: The Role And Rule Of Law, Susanne Baer
Book Chapters
In the 21st century, human rights are as present as they are endangered. Specifically, sex/gender equality rights are contested, or actively abridged, which is to be understood as an attack on women and on people who do not fit a ‘normal’ pattern of gender relations. Yet in addition, these are attacks on democratic constitutionalism itself. The article argues that to properly understand the recent contestations of human rights, one must distinguish between critique and attack, and revisit the very form and content of human rights, to deal with law’s ambivalence, such as ‘legal colonialism’, and also take into account critical …
What We Are Owed: The Possibilities Of A Civil Law Response To Sexual Injuries, Nathalie Marx
What We Are Owed: The Possibilities Of A Civil Law Response To Sexual Injuries, Nathalie Marx
Scripps Senior Theses
Drawing from philosophical, feminist, and legal frameworks, this thesis aims to reconceptualize our understanding of sexual violations. I suggest that rape and other sexual violations produce injuries unique from other forms of physical violence that must be addressed as an extension of a culture which objectifies, restricts the agency of, and shames women. It is argued that through the ability for survivors to bring a civil claim of negligence against their perpetrators following a sexual injury, pathways for restorative healing and cultural transformation are opened, and a more responsive legal standard for fault is created. This paper responds to theories …
The Limitations And Alternatives To Expanding The Equal Pay Act Under Bostock V. Clayton County, Ga., Valentina Wilson
The Limitations And Alternatives To Expanding The Equal Pay Act Under Bostock V. Clayton County, Ga., Valentina Wilson
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
#Metoo: Music Industry Edition, Nazarene Anderson
#Metoo: Music Industry Edition, Nazarene Anderson
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Weathering The Storm: Is California’S Anti-Harassment Education Training The Life Preserver Lgbtq Youth Have Been Hoping For?, Natalie Purcell O'Dwyer
Weathering The Storm: Is California’S Anti-Harassment Education Training The Life Preserver Lgbtq Youth Have Been Hoping For?, Natalie Purcell O'Dwyer
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transgender Student-Athletes Punch Back: A Legal Analysis Of States' "Fairness In Women's Sports Act" And How It Violates The Fourteenth Amendment And Title Ix, Daniel Jimenez
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Bring Your Kids Up Queer: Family Law Realism, Then And Now, Kris Franklin, Noa Ben-Asher
How To Bring Your Kids Up Queer: Family Law Realism, Then And Now, Kris Franklin, Noa Ben-Asher
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
Paula Ettelbrick fought for us.
As a pragmatic and radical litigator, Ettelbrick spent years trying to use a frequently uncomprehending and often outright hostile court system to protect LGBTQ+ Americans. While her work took her into the many areas of law that touched queer lives, a special focus and passion of her advocacy was reserved for queer families.
Paula also tried to warn us.
In the absence of legal recognition for the families we construct, queer lives are rendered not just invisible but virtually nonexistent; we become legal strangers to our loved ones in ways that violently obliterate our …
Religious Mediation As A Tool To Resolve Disputes Between Religious Universities And Their Lgbt Students, Isaac Altman
Religious Mediation As A Tool To Resolve Disputes Between Religious Universities And Their Lgbt Students, Isaac Altman
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Though the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) rights movement has made immense strides in recent years, there are many people who have been left behind in the sprint towards LGBT equality. Some of those are students or prospective students at religious schools, who can face discriminatory attitudes or be rejected outright by these institutions. While religiosity is generally associated with positive mental health outcomes, research shows that LGBT people who experience religious identity conflict are at significant risk of suicide. Religious institutions, for their part, are scrambling to adjust to the new reality in which their positions on LGBT …
Denouncing The Revival Of Pre-Roe V. Wade Abortion Bans In A Post-Dobbs World Through The Void Ab Initio And Presumption Of Validity Doctrines, Nora Greene
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
The United States Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade in a leaked draft of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Written by Justice Alito and joined by four of the other conservative justices, the decision describes Roe as “egregiously wrong from the start” and blatantly overrules the landmark holding and its prodigy, Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In their state codes, nine states—Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin— have unrepealed criminal abortion bans enacted before Roe. These bans prohibit abortion at any point in pregnancy unless to preserve the life of the pregnant person …
Introduction To Julie Bilotta’S Story, Sheila Wildeman
Introduction To Julie Bilotta’S Story, Sheila Wildeman
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Julie Bilotta’s contribution to this special volume is a straightforward denunciation of prison-based inhumanity and institutionalized misogyny. I write to show solidarity with her and to alert the reader to some of the ways her story exposes intersectional injustice while enlivening feminist abolitionist prison resistance. I write, too, to challenge my own and others’ thinking about whether or how law (litigation, law reform) might contribute to that resistance.
In her essay, Julie offers an intimate glimpse of prisons as sites of reproductive injustice. As this special volume attests, incarceration in Canada and elsewhere produces systematic gendered harms, including lack of …
What's Wrong With The Ncaa's New Transgender Athlete Policy?, Erin E. Buzuvis
What's Wrong With The Ncaa's New Transgender Athlete Policy?, Erin E. Buzuvis
Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the NCAA’s 2022 transgender athlete participation policy, which replaced the 2011 uniform eligibility rule with a sport-by-sport approach deferring to external governing bodies. It assesses the ambiguities created by this deference, particularly in sports where no clear policy exists, as well as the arbitrariness of the default testosterone threshold the NCAA adopted. It analyzes the tension between the NCAA’s stated alignment with Olympic frameworks and the reality that those frameworks were not designed for the collegiate context. It also considers the legal risks posed to NCAA member institutions, including potential liability under Title IX and the Equal …
Before Equal Protection: The Fall Of Cross-Dressing Bans And The Transgender Legal Movement, Kate Redburn
Before Equal Protection: The Fall Of Cross-Dressing Bans And The Transgender Legal Movement, Kate Redburn
Faculty Scholarship
Scholars are still unsure why American cities passed cross-dressing bans over the closing decades of the nineteenth century. By the 1960s, cities in every region of the United States had cross-dressing regulations, from major metropolitan centers to small cities and towns. They were used to criminalize gender non-conformity in many forms – for feminists, countercultural hippies, cross-dressers (or “transvestites”), and people we would now consider transgender. Starting in the late 1960s, however, criminal defendants began to topple cross-dressing bans.
Scholars are still unsure why American cities passed cross-dressing bans over the closing decades of the nineteenth century. By the 1960s, …
Leaving “Sex” Out Of It: Amending The Federal Arbitration Act To Ensure Bostock’S Victory For Lgbtq Employee Rights, Sheya Rivard
Leaving “Sex” Out Of It: Amending The Federal Arbitration Act To Ensure Bostock’S Victory For Lgbtq Employee Rights, Sheya Rivard
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Visibility Trap, Kate Redburn
The Visibility Trap, Kate Redburn
Faculty Scholarship
Vice Patrol offers a novel history of the visibility trap. It integrates interventions in legal history, history of sexuality, and queer theory with remarkable ease. Lvovsky brings new insight to a question that has puzzled scholars across several fields: Why and how does cultural representation lead to increased state repression? Blending impressive archival research with sophisticated theoretical analysis, Lvovsky follows cultural knowledge into the legal system to offer a fresh diagnosis of the problem and how it develops. In her discovery of “epistemic gaps,” she uncovers a key mechanism of the visibility trap. Disagreements between the police and the courts, …
Current Complications In The Law On Myths And Stereotypes, Lisa Dufraimont
Current Complications In The Law On Myths And Stereotypes, Lisa Dufraimont
Articles & Book Chapters
Myths and stereotypes represent an ongoing problem in Canadian sexual assault trials. Often, and paradigmatically, defence lawyers and trial judges rely on discredited sexist assumptions to the prejudice of female sexual assault complainants. However, a review of the recent appellate case law reveals many cases that do not fit this paradigm. Complications that have arisen include stereotypes about men or accused persons, legitimate defence arguments misidentified as stereotypes, close cases where reasonable people disagree about whether stereotypes have been invoked, and prejudicial forms of reasoning based other axes of discrimination. This paper surveys these developments and assesses an attempt by …
Classrooms Into Courtrooms, Naomi M. Mann
Classrooms Into Courtrooms, Naomi M. Mann
Faculty Scholarship
The federal Department of Education’s (DOE) 2020 Title IX Rule fundamentally transformed the relationship between postsecondary schools (schools) and students. While courts have long warned against turning classrooms into courtrooms, the 2020 Rule nonetheless imposed a mandatory quasi-criminal courtroom procedure for Title IX sexual harassment investigatory proceedings in schools. This transformation is a reflection of the larger trend of importing criminal law norms and due process protections into Title IX school proceedings. It is especially regressive at a time where calls for long-overdue criminal justice reform are reaching a boiling point across the nation. Its effects are especially troubling because …
Bostock Was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, And Title Vii, Mitchell N. Berman, Guha Krishnamurthi
Bostock Was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, And Title Vii, Mitchell N. Berman, Guha Krishnamurthi
Notre Dame Law Review
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court held that federal antidiscrimination law prohibits employment discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Unsurprisingly, the result won wide acclaim in the mainstream legal and popular media. Results aside, however, the reaction to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion, which purported to ground the outcome in a textualist approach to statutory interpretation, was more mixed. The great majority of commentators, both liberal and conservative, praised Justice Gorsuch for what they deemed a careful and sophisticated—even “magnificent” and “exemplary”—application of textualist principles, …
The 5th Annual Stonewall Lecture: Featuring Keynote Speaker Taylor Brown, Roger Williams University School Of Law
The 5th Annual Stonewall Lecture: Featuring Keynote Speaker Taylor Brown, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Integrating Doctrine And Diversity Speaker Series: When Law School Classroom Discussions Of Diversity Issues Go Wrong, Roger Williams University School Of Law, City University Of New York School Of Law
Integrating Doctrine And Diversity Speaker Series: When Law School Classroom Discussions Of Diversity Issues Go Wrong, Roger Williams University School Of Law, City University Of New York School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.