Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Commercial Law (240)
- Banking and Finance Law (236)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (234)
- Other Law (230)
- Securities Law (217)
-
- Consumer Protection Law (214)
- International Trade Law (213)
- Transnational Law (213)
- Administrative Law (211)
- Criminal Law (211)
- Family Law (210)
- Legal Remedies (210)
- Accounting Law (209)
- Business Organizations Law (209)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (209)
- Constitutional Law (209)
- Criminal Procedure (209)
- Disability Law (209)
- Fourteenth Amendment (209)
- Housing Law (209)
- Human Rights Law (209)
- Immigration Law (209)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (209)
- Insurance Law (209)
- Intellectual Property Law (209)
- Labor and Employment Law (209)
- Law and Gender (209)
- Law and Psychology (209)
- Keyword
-
- Corporate (16)
- Corporation (12)
- Law (12)
- Blair (11)
- Shareholder (11)
-
- Stout (11)
- Team production (10)
- Governance (8)
- Finance (7)
- Financial Law (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Regulation (6)
- Technology (6)
- Board (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- International Law (4)
- Public health (4)
- SEC (4)
- Securities (4)
- Securities Law (4)
- Stakeholder (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Corporate governance (3)
- Data (3)
- Publication Year
Articles 241 - 243 of 243
Full-Text Articles in Secured Transactions
The U.C.C. And Franchise Act Remedies: Coast To Coast Stores, Inc. V. Gruschus, Misty Ellen Mondress
The U.C.C. And Franchise Act Remedies: Coast To Coast Stores, Inc. V. Gruschus, Misty Ellen Mondress
Seattle University Law Review
Coast to Coast Stores, Inc. v. Gruschus was the first Washington case to deal with the potential conflict between the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) and the Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA), arising when a franchisor repossesses goods after a franchisee defaults under a security agreement. The Washington Supreme Court avoided the conflict, however, by holding that because the franchisor never terminated the franchise, the FIPA protections were not triggered. The U.C.C. remedies therefore applied: the franchisor could collect the proceeds of a liquidation sale of the secured goods-in this case the franchisee's inventory and supplies-in reduction of the franchisee's indebtedness; …
Limitations On Creditors' Rights To Require Spouses' Signatures Under The Ecoa And Washington Community Property Law, Todd M. Johnson
Limitations On Creditors' Rights To Require Spouses' Signatures Under The Ecoa And Washington Community Property Law, Todd M. Johnson
Seattle University Law Review
This article examines the federal regulations' interaction with Washington community property law to determine when a creditor can require the signature of a Washington applicant's spouse on either a loan instrument or security agreement in five common situations: (1) a married applicant's request for credit secured by community property, (2) a married applicant's request for credit secured by separate property, (3) a married applicant's request for general unsecured credit, (4) a married applicant's request for unsecured credit in specific reliance upon his or her income flow, and (5) a married applicant's request for unsecured credit in specific reliance upon the …
Consumer Liability For Deficiencies In Washington, Edith R. Warkentine
Consumer Liability For Deficiencies In Washington, Edith R. Warkentine
Seattle University Law Review
This article focuses on a secured party's right to hold a debtor liable for a deficiency when resale of the goods does not satisfy the remaining obligation.