Secured Transactions Commons^™

Legislative Process And Commercial Law: Lessons From The Copyright Act Of 1976 And The Uniform Commercial Code, Harold R. Weinberg, William J. Woodward Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Overlap and conflict are inevitable in any legal system in which a federal government and state governments both have authority to enact laws. In our federal system, the Constitution's Supremacy Clause identifies federal law as preeminent in case of conflict. When conflict develops and litigation is required to determine whether state or federal law controls the issue at hand, our system analyzes the problem using the term preemption as a basis for analysis.

This Article explores the federal legislative process that precedes judicial preemption decisions. By studying the legislative process for its sensitivity to preemption issues, possible ways to modify …

Fair Dealing Comes Of Age In The Regulation Of Going Private Transactions, Carole Silver

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green: An Analysis Two Years Later, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In 1977, the Supreme Court decided Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green. Although the outcome of that decision should have surprised no one, since the trend of the Court clearly had been to constrict the scope of the federal securities legislation, the case was a major decision that will have a substantial impact on the development of corporate law in this country. Indeed, it may turn out to be one of the most significant corporate cases decided by the Supreme Court in recent years. Since by this point the dust has settled from the case, it seems appropriate to …

Definition Of Control In Secondary Distributions, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Section 2(11) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Act) generally subjects the sale of securities by a person "controlling an issuer" to the same rules that govern the sale of securities by an issuer. Accordingly, before a "control" person may sell the securities he holds in the controlled corporation he must either register them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) or qualify for an exemption from the registration requirement. While the Act clearly requires that a "control" person either register or qualify for an exemption, it fails to define "control." Thus, the task of defining has fallen to the …

Reformation In Corporate Law: Equal Opportunity Must Be Afforded Minority Stockholders In Any Transaction In Shares By Those In Control: Jones V. Ii. F. Ahmanson, Michael D. O'Connor

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Stockholder Votes Motivated By Adverse Interest: The Attack And The Defense, Earl Sneed

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this article to study stockholder votes motivated by adverse interest from the standpoint of the attack and the defense. First, the remedies available to the complaining minority are examined. Then follows a study of the indicia of adverse interest in specific shareholder actions. Knowledge of the nature and import of these indicia should enable the careful lawyer to avoid or defeat the charge that unconscionable adverse interest vitiated the result of a stockholder vote.

Trust Receipts

Michigan Law Review

That the conflict between the convenience of business and the rigidity of the law continually brings about modifications and expansions of legal doctrine is nowhere better illustrated than in the field of commercial financing. A merchant wishes to purchase goods; he has no funds or available unencumbered property for security; his general credit is too poor to warrant either the manufacturer or a bank in making advances without security. How can the manufacturer give the merchant possession and power of sale of the goods and yet retain a legal hold on them or their proceeds as security for the payment …