Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (25)
- Legal History (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Courts (2)
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legislation (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Education Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Pace University (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
-
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Seton Hall University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Popular Media (3)
-
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Seton Hall Circuit Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- University of San Francisco Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Second Amendment
The Sound Of Silence: The Supreme Court And The Second Amendment - A Response To Professor Kopel, David S. Yassky
The Sound Of Silence: The Supreme Court And The Second Amendment - A Response To Professor Kopel, David S. Yassky
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Until now, the revisionists have based their argument entirely on claims about the intentions of those who framed and ratified the Second Amendment. Revisionists have heretofore conceded that the courts have rejected their approach; indeed, the basic structure of the revisionist argument has been: The Founders intended an individual right to firearm possession; the courts (abetted by the academy) have all but nullified the Amendment by treating it as a mere safeguard for militia; the courts should recognize their error and strike down gun control laws.
With his latest contribution, David Kopel seeks to open a second front in the …